Joint Strength Optimization of Bi-Adhesively Bonded Composite-Aluminum Sandwich Structure

• Authors: M. Uysal
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Adhesively bonded joint strength optimization can be obtained through the modification of the overlap length and bi-adhesively bonded technique. In this technique, the joints have two different types of adhesive in the overlap length. In the present paper, the effects of bi-adhesively bondline on the shear stress, peeling stress and von-Mises stress of tongue and groove joints were investigated by using finite element analysis. The joint models were consisted of thick woven E-glass/vinyl ester laminate composite groove geometry together with aluminum 5083 tongue geometry. Finite element analyses were performed for three different tongue lengths (75, 150, 225 mm). The distribution of shear and peeling stresses were investigated on adhesively bonded tongue and groove joints subjected to longitudinal tensile loads. The results indicated that the joint strength can be improved by selecting appropriate design parameter values with bi-adhesive bonded technique.

Keywords

EN

81.05.-t

Discipline

• 81.05.-t: Specific materials: fabrication, treatment, testing, and analysis(for superconducting materials, see 74.70.-b, and 74.72.-h; for magnetic materials, see 75.50.-y; for optical materials, see 42.70.-a; for dielectric materials, see 77.84.-s; for disperse systems and complex fluids, see 82.70.-y; see also 82.75.-z Molecular sieves, zeolites, clathrates, and other complex solids; for materials properties, see sections 60 and 70)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 129
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 445-447

Dates

published

2016-04

Contributors

author

M. Uysal

• Yildiz Technical University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 34349 Istanbul, Turkey

References

• [1] G.J. Dvorak, J. Zhang, O.E. Canyurt, Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 1123 (2001), doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00012-4
• [2] O.E. Canyurt, C. Meran, M. Uslu, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 30, 281 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.005
• [3] M. Uysal, M.Sc. Thesis, Pamukkale University, 2010 (in Turkish)
• [4] E.A.S. Marques, L.F.M. da Silva, J. Adhesion 84, 917 (2008), doi: 10.1080/00218460802505275
• [5] P.J.C. das Neves, L.F.M. da Silva, R.D. Adams, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 23, 1 (2009), doi: 10.1163/156856108X336026
• [6] I. Pires, L. Quintino, J.F. Durodola, A. Beevers, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 23, 215 (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00024-1
• [7] I. Pires, L. Quintino, R.M. Miranda, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 20, 19 (2006), doi: 10.1163/156856106775212387
• [8] O. Bavi, N. Bavi, M. Shishesaz, J. Adhesion 89, 948 (2013), doi: 10.1080/00218464.2013.782813
• [9] S. Kumar, P.C. Pandey, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 24, 1251 (2010), doi: 10.1163/016942409X12561252291982

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.129.445