PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 127 | 3A | A-86-A-94
Article title

Path Dependence in Neoclassical Economic Growth Theory

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Path dependence is a key feature of complex economic systems. It implies that history matters in the long-term evolution of markets and economies. Path dependence can be viewed as the dynamic version of positive feedback effects. This paper focuses on the nonlinear neoclassical economic growth model with the Cobb-Douglas production function, which accounts for problems related to pollutant emissions. It was found that only selected initial forms have a chance to develop. Present states depend on past states, even though the historical circumstances that had affected the past states may no longer be relevant. The choice among different histories may be a stochastic process. The understanding of economic growth suggested in this study stands in opposition to the neoclassical tradition based on equilibrium states or paths independent of the system's history. In contemporary economics, the idea of path dependence is most often used in studies on the high-tech industry, where the researchers are focused on such phenomena as innovation processes, monopolization, or the causes of ineffective technical solutions. The analysis of historical conditions is almost entirely carried out with the use of qualitative methods, since the subject of the research is non-formalized. In addition, the theoretical basis for conducting relevant empirical research is still missing. As a result of the development of complexity economics in recent years, numerous dynamic features of complex economic systems can be examined with the application of quantitative methods which, in effect, strengthens the bonds between theory and practice. Rare exceptions include path dependence relations. The aim of this article is to fill this gap and to create a theoretical basis for quantitative research on historical conditions in economics. This is a necessary condition for undertaking empirical research. The theoretical search started with the Keynesian model of the Samuelson-Hicks trade cycle, to demonstrate that conventional economics completely omits the most interesting path-dependence cases. It turns out that only the neoclassical model of economic growth, taking into account two power laws, provides appropriate dynamic characteristics for a full description of path dependence relations. Therefore, appropriate theoretical bases can be provided only by complexity economics. It may seem that, in this work, the dependence on history is restricted to two successive time steps in the case of the Samuelson-Hicks model and a single step in the neoclassical model of economic growth by Day. However, it examines an ordered path dependence, where events are chronologically ordered and the impact of earlier events on the later ones occurs through intermediary events. It should be remembered that events are constantly affected by environmental stimuli that are reflected not only in initial conditions, but also in the values of the parameters for all periods. Thus, it is not a case of short-term memory.
Keywords
Contributors
author
  • Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, pl. Defilad 1, PL-00901 Warsaw, Poland
References
  • [1] W.B. Arthur, Complexity Economics: A Different Framework for Economic Thought, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper: 2013-04-012 (2013)
  • [2] S.N. Durlauf, What Should Policymakers Know About Economic Complexity?, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper: 97-10-080 (1997)
  • [3] W.B. Arthur, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 1994
  • [4] C. Antonelli, Path Dependence, Localized Technological Change and the Quest for Dynamic Efficiency, in: New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology: Essays in Honour of Paul A. David, Eds. C. Antonelli, D. Foray, B.H. Hall, W.E. Steinmueller, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2006, p. 51
  • [5] W. Kwaśnicki, Skanalizowane ścieżki rozwoju przemysłu, XX Szkoła Symulacji Systemów Gospodarczych, Polanica Zdrój 2003
  • [6] P.A. David, Path Dependence, its Critics and the Quest for `Historical Economics', in: Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, Eds. P. Garrouste, S. Ioannides, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2001, p. 15
  • [7] S.J. Liebowitz, S.E. Margolis (Eds.), Path Dependence and Lock-In, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2014
  • [8] R. Martin, P. Sunley, The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape, in: The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Eds. R. Boschma, R. Martin, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2010, p. 62
  • [9] J. Koch, M. Eisend, A. Petermann, Bus. Res. 2, 67 (2009)
  • [10] C. List, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98, 495 (2004), doi: 10.1017/S0003055404001303
  • [11] P. Malpass, Housing, Theory and Society 28, 305 (2011), doi: 10.1080/14036096.2011.554852
  • [12] C. Castaldi, G. Dosi, E. Paraskevopoulou, Path Dependence in Technologies and Organizations: A Concise Guide, Working Paper 11.04, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 2011
  • [13] K.J. Meier, R.D. Wrinkle, S. Robinson, J.L. Polinard, Path Dependence and Organizational Performance: Representative Bureaucracy, Prior Decisions, and Academic Outcomes, 59th National Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago 2001
  • [14] I. Greener, Theorising Path Dependence: How does History Come to Matter in Organisations, and what Can We Do about It?, Working Paper 3, Department of Management Studies, University of York, York 2004
  • [15] B. Ebbinghaus, Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform, Discussion Paper 05/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne 2005
  • [16] R. Hochreiter, G.Ch. Pflug, Computational Economics 28, 291 (2006), doi: 10.1007/s10614-006-9049-z
  • [17] J. Mahoney, Theory and Society 29, 507 (2000)
  • [18] P. Pierson, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94, 251 (2000)
  • [19] L. Dobusch J. Kapeller, Schmalenbach Business Review 65, 288 (2013)
  • [20] J.-P. Vergne, R. Durand, J. Manage. Stud. 47, 736 (2010), doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x
  • [21] J. Sydow, A. Windeler, G. Müller-Seitz, K. Lange, Bus. Res. 5, 155 (2012), doi: 10.1007/BF03342736
  • [22] R.I. Khrapko, Path-Dependent Functions, Theor. Math. Phys. 65, 1196 (1985), doi: 10.1007/BF01036127
  • [23] S.E. Page, Q. J. Political Science 1, 87 (2006), doi: 10.1561/100.00000006
  • [24] J.M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, 5th ed., MacMillan, London 1946
  • [25] A. Herscovici, Nature of Capital, Long-Run Expectations and Path Dependence in the General Theory: Some Epistemological Observations, The Third Nordic Post-Keynesian Conference, Aalborg University, Aalborg 2014
  • [26] P.A. Samuelson, A Synthesis of the Principle of Acceleration and the Multiplier, J. Polit. Econ. 47, 786 (1939)
  • [27] P.A. Samuelson, Rev. Econ. Stat. 21, 75 (1939)
  • [28] A. Jakimowicz, Analiza porównawcza teorii cyklu koniunkturalnego w ujęciu J.M. Keynesa i P.A. Samuelsona [ A Comparative Analysis of J.M. Keynes' and P.A. Samuelson's Business Cycle Theories], Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 1991
  • [29] J.R. Hicks, A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1951
  • [30] A. Jakimowicz, Od Keynesa do teorii chaosu. Ewolucja teorii wahań koniunkturalnych [ From Keynes to Chaos Theory. Evolution of Business Cycle Theories], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Seria: 'Współczesna Ekonomia', Warszawa 2012
  • [31] R.G.D. Allen, Ekonomia matematyczna, PWN, Warszawa 1961
  • [32] J. Bellaíche, J. Math. Econ. 46, 163 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2009.11.002
  • [33] E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002
  • [34] R.M. Solow, Q. J. Econ. 70, 65 (1956), doi: 10.2307/1884513
  • [35] R.G.D. Allen, Teoria makroekonomiczna. Ujęcie matematyczne, PWN, Warszawa 1975
  • [36] R.H. Day, Am. Econ. Rev. 72, 406 (1982)
  • [37] R.H. Day, The Emergence of Chaos from Classical Economic Growth, Q. J. Econ. 98, 201 (1983), doi: 10.2307/1885621
  • [38] V. Pareto, Cours d'économie politique, vol. 1-2, in: Oeuvres complètes, Eds. G.-H. Bousquet, G. Busino, vol. 1, Librairie Droz, Genève 1964
  • [39] V. Pareto, Manual of Political Economy, Macmillan, London 1971
  • [40] A. Jakimowicz, Podstawy interwencjonizmu państwowego. Historiozofia ekonomii [ Foundations of State Interventionism: Philosophy of Economics History], Seria: Współczesna Ekonomia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2012
  • [41] G. Abraham-Frois, Dynamique économique, Dalloz, Paris 1995
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv127n3a15kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.