Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 127 | 2 | 493-495

Article title

Entanglement Detection with Non-Ideal Ferromagnetic Detectors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Entangled states are essential in basics quantum communication protocols and quantum cryptography. Ferromagnetic contacts can work as a spin detector, giving possibility of converting information about electron spin to the electric charge, and therefore, detection of entangled states with the electric current measurements is possible. Method of confirming entanglement with non-ideal detectors is presented, the impact of decoherence and noise on states and quality of entanglement is discussed. Entanglement witness (EW) operator method is compared with the CHSH inequalities approach. Required spin polarization for the EW is lower than for the CHSH inequalities. System with asymmetric spin polarizations of detectors was analyzed, including the CHSH inequalities and the EW method.

Keywords

EN

Contributors

author
  • Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Science, 60-179 Poznan, Poland
author
  • Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Science, 60-179 Poznan, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
  • Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Science, 60-179 Poznan, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
  • Department of Physics, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
  • Department of Physics, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
author
  • Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Science, 60-179 Poznan, Poland

References

  • [1] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, P. Gérard, R. Gérard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460
  • [2] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996), doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2
  • [3] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 200, 1 (1995), doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00214-N
  • [4] J. Eldridge, M.G. Pala, M. Governale, J. König, Phys. Rev. B. 82, 184507 (2010), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.184507
  • [5] W. Kłobus, A. Grudka, A. Baumgartner, D. Tomaszewski, C. Schönenberger, J. Martinek, Phys. Rev. B. 89, 125404 (2014), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.125404
  • [6] A. Acin, J. Bae, E. Bagan, M. Baig, Ll. Masanes, R. Munoz-Tapia Phys. Rev. A 73, 012327 (2006), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012327

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv127n2108kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.