PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 126 | 4a | A-97-A-100
Article title

Alternative Equation of Motion Approach to the Single-Impurity Anderson Model

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Solving the single-impurity Anderson model is a basic problem of solid state physics. The single-impurity Anderson model is very important, at present it is also used for systems with quantum impurities, e.g. semiconductor quantum dots and molecular transistors. Its main application is in the scheme of dynamical mean field theory describing strong correlation electron systems. To solve the single-impurity Anderson model problem we use the equation of motion Green function approach. In this report we present the novel equation of motion approximation in which we differentiate the Green function over both time variables. This differs from the commonly used equation of motion solution by Appelbaum, Penn and Lacroix where the authors take time derivative only over primary time variable. After extending calculations to higher order Green functions we find the new approximate dynamical solution of single-impurity Anderson model. The results are compared with the solutions to the single-impurity Anderson model problem at intermediate Coulomb repulsion U such as the modified iterative perturbation theory. Our approach is suitable for describing quantum dots.
Keywords
EN
Publisher

Year
Volume
126
Issue
4a
Pages
A-97-A-100
Physical description
Dates
published
2014-10
Contributors
author
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, T. Rejtana 16A, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, T. Rejtana 16A, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, T. Rejtana 16A, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
References
  • [1] P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961), doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.41
  • [2] A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, M.J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996), doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
  • [3] D. Meyer, T. Wegner, M. Potthoff, W. Nolting, Physica B 270, 225 (1999), doi: 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)00183-0
  • [4] H. Kajueter, G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 131 (1996), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.131
  • [5] M. Potthoff, T. Wegner, W. Nolting, Phys. Rev. B 55, 16132 (1997), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.16132
  • [6] C. Lacroix, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 2131 (1982), doi: 10.1063/1.330756
  • [7] J.A. Appelbaum, D.R. Penn, Phys. Rev. 188, 874 (1969), doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.188.874
  • [8] A.L. Kuzemsky, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 25, 1 (2002)
  • [9] G. Górski, J. Mizia, Physica B 427, 42 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2013.06.032
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv126n4a21kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.