Importance of Measurement Parameters for the Dental Implant Surface Characterization

• Authors: A. Gunay , B. Sagbas , M. Durakbasa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Pure titanium and its alloys have been widely used in biomedical applications on account of their biological and mechanical properties. Although the mechanical properties of titanium provide acceptable responses under dynamic pressures, surface modifications are needed in order to improve osseointegration between bone-implant interfaces. There are many different surface modification techniques like sand blasting, acid etching, or coating with various materials. Surface characterization is as important as surface modification for dental implants. Although many researchers studied about measurement of surface characteristics of dental implants with similar techniques but with different measurement parameters, there is still no consensus about the optimal surface characteristics values of a successful dental implant. Among many other surface characteristics, surface roughness is one of the most important features for dental implants. In this study, the importance of surface roughness measurement of dental implants is discussed and the need of a standardized procedure for implant surface roughness measurement is emphasized. In our experimental study three different processed surfaces as sand blasted and hydrofluoric acid etched surfaces, sand blasted and nitric acid etched surfaces and blasted surfaces were investigated. Results are compared via each method and each processing technique. It is aimed to highlight the importance of a standardized method for measuring and describing surface characteristics. More definitive, standardized methods are needed to augment the rather existing varied combined measurement parameters which affect the results for the assessment of biomedical surfaces.

Keywords

EN

81.70.-q

Discipline

• 81.70.-q: Methods of materials testing and analysis(see also 82.80.-d Chemical analysis and related physical methods of analysis)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 125
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 484-487

Dates

published

2014-02

Contributors

author

A. Gunay

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34349 Besiktas, İstanbul, Turkey

author

B. Sagbas

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34349 Besiktas, İstanbul, Turkey

author

M. Durakbasa

• Department of Interchangeable Manufacturing and Industrial Metrology, Institute for Production Engineering , and Laser Technology, Vienna University of Technology, Karlspl. 13/3113, A-1040 Wien, Austria

References

• 1. A. Gupta, M. Dhanraj, G. Sivagami, doi: 10.5580/1aee, Intern. J. Dental Sci. 7, 10-10 (2009)
• 2. I.M.O. Bernal, I. Risa, K. Hiroki, T. Ken-Ichiro, Y. Naoko, T. Toshi-Ichiro, N. Kuniteru, M. Masahiko, J. Gifu Dental Soc. 35, 89 (2009)
• 3. A. Daskalaki, Dental Computing and Applications: Advanced Techniques for Clinical Dentistry, IGI Global, New York 2009 (e-book)
• 4. G. Mendonça, D.B.S. Mendonça, F.J.L. Aragão, L.F. Cooper, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012, Biomaterials 29, 3822 (2008)
• 5. M.M. Shalabi, A. Gortemaker, M.A. Van't Hof, J.A. Jansen, N.H.J. Creugers, doi: 10.1177/154405910608500603, J. Dental Res. 85, 496 (2006)
• 6. F.H. Jones, doi: 10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X, Surf. Sci. Rep. 42, 75 (2001)
• 7. M.H. Prado da Silva, G.A. Soares, C.N. Elias, J.H.C. Lima, H. Schechtman, I.R. Gibson, S.M. Best, doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392000000300003, Mater. Res. 3, 61 (2000)
• 8. W.-R. Chang, M. Hirvonen, R. Grönqvist, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2004.01.002, Safety Sci. 42, 755 (2004)
• 9. H.J. Rönold, J.E. Ellingsen, doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00167-9, Biomaterials 23, 4211 (2002)
• 10. M.N. Durakbasa, W. Pirker, P.H. Osanna, P. Demircioglu, G. Bas, B. Gültekin, in: 14 Joint Int. IMEKO TC1+TC7 TC13 th + Symp. Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training, Jena (Germany), Eds.: P. Scharff, G. Linß, Universitätsverlag Ilmenau, Ilmenau 2011, paper No. urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-2011imeko-085:3
• 11. C.N. Eliasa, Y. Oshida, J.H. Lima, C.A. Mullere, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.12.002, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. I, 234 (2008)
• 12. F.V.G. Brookshire, W. Nagy, V.B. Dhuru, G.J. Ziebert, S. Chada, doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70028-3, J. Prosthet. Dent. 78, 86 (1997)
• 13. C. Aparicioa, A. Padrós, G. Francisco-Javier, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.005, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4, No. 4, 1672 (2011)
• 14. F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, D. Rehbein, D. Axmann, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.015, Biomaterials 25, 1429 (2004)
• 15. W. Barthlott, C. Neinhuis, doi: 10.1007/s004250050096, Planta 202, 1 (1997)
• 16. M. Wieland, P. Hänggi, W. Hotz, M. Textor, B.A. Keller, N.D. Spencer, doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00347-6, Wear 237, 231 (2000)
• 17. ISO 4287:1997 + Cor 1:1998 + Cor 2:2005 + Amd 1:2009; Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile method - Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters
• 18. ASME B46.1:2009; Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay)
• 19. ISO 25178-601:2010; Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Areal - Part 601: Nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.125.484