Analysis of Resistive Superconducting Transition of a (Tl_{0.6}Pb_{0.24}Bi_{0.16})(Ba_{0.1}Sr_{0.9})_2Ca_2Cu_3O_{y} Film

• Authors: W. Woch , M. Chrobak , A. Kołodziejczyk
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper we analyze the resistive transition as a function of both the temperature and the dc applied magnetic field. We use the two models: first, based on the Ambegaokar and Halperin theory that describes the resistive transitions by the modified Bessel function and second, based on the Anderson and Kim theory represented by the exponential formula. The fits of the models to experimental results show that the freezing into superconducting vortex-glass phase takes place at the same temperature that does not practically depend on the applied magnetic field.

Keywords

EN

74.25.Uv; 74.25.Sv; 74.20.De

Discipline

• 74.20.De: Phenomenological theories (two-fluid, Ginzburg-Landau, etc.)
• 74.25.Sv: Critical currents
• 74.25.Uv: Vortex phases (includes vortex lattices, vortex liquids, and vortex glasses)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 118
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 389-392

Dates

published

2010-08

Contributors

author

W. Woch

• Solid State Physics Department, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

author

M. Chrobak

• Solid State Physics Department, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

author

A. Kołodziejczyk

• Solid State Physics Department, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

References

• 1. M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1658 (1988)
• 2. W.M. Woch, R. Zalecki, A. Kołodziejczyk, O. Heiml, G. Gritzner, Physica C 434, 17 (2006)
• 3. Y. Yeshurun, A.P. Malozemoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2202 (1988)
• 4. R.H. Koch, V. Foglietti, W.J. Gallagher, G. Koen, A. Gupta, M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1511 (1989)
• 5. V. Ambegaokar, B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1364 (1969)
• 6. P.W. Anderson, Y.B. Kim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 39 (1964)
• 7. Ju-Jin Kim, Ho-kyun Lee, Jinwook Chung, Hyun Joon Shin, Hu Jong Lee and Ja Kang Ku, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2962 (1991)
• 8. E. Zeldow, N.M. Amer, G. Koren, A. Gupta, R.J. Gambino, M.W. McElfresh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 3093 (1989)
• 9. O. Heiml, G. Gritzner, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 15, 956 (2002)
• 10. L.G. Aslamazov, A.I. Larkin, Soviet Solid State 10, 875 (1968); Phys. Lett. 26A, 238 (1968)
• 11. A.I. Larkin, A.A. Varlamov, in Superconductivity, Eds. K.H. Bennemann, J.B. Ketterson, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 2008, p. 369
• 12. P. Pureur, R. Menegotto Costa, P. Rodrigues, Jr., J. Schaf, J.V. Kunzler, Phys. Rev. B 47, 11420 (1993)
• 13. R. Menegotto Costa, P. Pureur, M. Gusmao, S. Senoussi, K. Behnia, Phys. Rev. B 64, 214513 (2001)
• 14. A. Kozłowski, Z. Tarnawski, A. Kołodziejczyk, J. Chmist, T. Ściężor, R. Zalecki, Physica C 184, 113 (1991)
• 15. C.J. Lobb, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3930 (1987)

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.118.389