Nonexistence of the Classical Trajectories in the Stern-Gerlach Experiment

• Authors: M. Arsenijević , M. Dugić
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Stern-Gerlach experiment is a paradigm of the quantum measurement of spin. Its physical interpretation is in intimate relation with the physical basis of the current research in the atomic (molecular) nanofabrication procedures. Nevertheless, interpretation of the experiment is an open issue yet. Here, we give the arguments for the physical nonexistence of the so-called classical trajectories of the atoms (molecules) in front of the screen. Some nanotech-related consequences are distinguished.

Keywords

EN

03.65.Ta; 03.65.Yz; 81.16.Ta

Discipline

• 03.65.Yz: Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods(see also 03.67.Pp in quantum information; for decoherence in Bose-Einstein condensates, see 03.75.Gg)
• 03.65.Ta: Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory(for optical tests of quantum theory, see 42.50.Xa)
• 81.16.Ta: Atom manipulation(see also 82.37.Gk STM and AFM manipulation of a single-molecule; for atom and molecule traps, see 37.10.Gh, and 37.10.Pq, respectively; 87.80.Nj Single-molecule techniques in biological physics; 82.37.Rs Single-molecule manipulation of proteins and other biological molecules in physical chemistry)

• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 117
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 760-763

Dates

published

2010-05

Contributors

author

M. Arsenijević

• Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, R. Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia

author

M. Dugić

• Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, R. Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia

References

• 1. W. Pauli, in: Handbuck der Physik, Ed. S. Flugge, Springer, Berlin 1985, p. 165
• 2. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice Hall, New York 1989
• 3. T.R. Oliveira, A.O. Caldeira, Coherence and entanglement in a Stern-Gerlach experiment, arXiv:quant-ph/0608192v1, 24 Aug 2006
• 4. M. Nielsen, I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge, UK 2000
• 5. E. Joos, H.D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch, I.-O. Stamatescu, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Springer, New York 2003
• 6. D. Meschede, H. Metcalf, J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 36 R17-R38 (2003)
• 7. D. Meschede, Optics, Light and Lasers: The Practical Approach to Modern Photonics and Laser Physics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2007
• 8. H.-P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, New York 2007
• 9. M. Dugić, Eur. Phys. J. D 29, 173 (2004)
• 10. R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994
• 11. A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (NY) 149, 374 (1983)
• 12. Y. Miroshnychenko, D. Schrader, S. Kuhr, W. Alt, I. Dotsenko, M. Khudaverdyan, A. Rauschenbeutel, D. Meschede, Optics Express 11, 3498 (2003)
• 13. T.E. Phipps, J.B. Taylor, Phys. Rev. 29, 309 (1927)
• 14. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, North-Holand Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1976
• 15. H.D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of The Direction of Time, Springer-Verlag, 4-th Edition, Berlin 2001
• 16. R. Arun, J.Ch. Averbulch, T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 72, 023417 (2005)
• 17. F. Tantussi, A. Camposeo, M. Alderighi, N. Puccini, E. Andreoni, M. Allegrini, E. Arimondo, F. Fuso, Mat. Sci. Eng. C 27, 1418 (2007)
• 18. Z. Cui, Nanofabrication - Principles, Capabilities and Limits, Springer, New York 2008

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.117.760