PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2009 | 115 | 6 | 1095-1097
Article title

Changes of the Electrode Surface Roughness Induced by High-Voltage Electric Pulses as Revealed by AFM

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The changes of the surface topography of stainless-steel and aluminium electrodes occurring due to the action of electric pulses which are utilized for cell electroporation, have been studied by using atomic force microscopy. The surfaces of the polished stainless-steel electrodes were smooth - the average roughness was 13-17 nm and the total roughness 140-180 nm. The total roughness of the aluminium electrodes was about 320 nm. After the treatment of the chambers filled with 154 mM NaCl solution by a series of short (20-40 μs), high-voltage (4 kV) pulses with the total dissolution charge of 0.20-0.26 A s/cm^{2}, the roughness of the surface of the electrodes has increased, depending on the total amount of the electric charge that has passed through the unit area of the electrode. Up to a two- and threefold increase of the surface roughness of the stainless-steel and aluminium anodes respectively was observed due to the dissolution of the anode material. Therefore, the use of high-voltage electric pulses leads to the increase of the inhomogeneity of the electric field at the electrode, which facilitates the occurrence of the electric breakdown of the liquid samples and causes non-equal treatment of each cell.
Keywords
EN
Contributors
  • Vytautas Magnus University, 58 K. Donelaičio str., LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Kaunas University of Technology, 65 Studentų str., LT-51369 Kaunas, Lithuania
author
  • Vytautas Magnus University, 58 K. Donelaičio str., LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
author
  • Kaunas University of Technology, 65 Studentų str., LT-51369 Kaunas, Lithuania
References
  • 1. J. Gehl, Acta Physiol. Scand. 177, 437 (2003)
  • 2. G. Milazzo, Electrochemistry: Theoretical Principles and Practical Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1963
  • 3. J.W. Loomis-Husselbee, P.J. Cullen, R.F. Irvine, A.P. Dawson, Biochem. J. 277, 883 (1991)
  • 4. T. Tomov, I. Tsoneva, Bioelectrochemistry 51, 207 (2000)
  • 5. G. Saulis, R. Lape, R. Praneviciute, D. Mickevicius, Bioelectrochemistry 67, 101 (2005)
  • 6. G. Binnig, C.F. Quate, C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986)
  • 7. G. Saulis, R. Rodaite-Riseviciene, V. Snitka, Bioelectrochemistry 70, 519 (2007)
  • 8. I.E. Pol, W.G.C. van Arendonk, H.C. Mastwijk, J. Krommer, E.J. Smid, R. Moezelaar, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 1693 (2001)
  • 9. M. Puc, S. Čorovic, K. Flisar, M. Petkovšek, J. Nastran, D. Miklavčič, Bioelectrochemistry 64, 113 (2004)
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv115n648kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.