PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 114 | 3 | 517-524
Article title

On the Empirical Importance of the Conditional Skewness Assumption in Modelling the Relationship between Risk and Return

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
We present the results of an application of Bayesian inference in testing the relation between risk and return on the financial instruments. On the basis of the Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model, proposed by Merton we built a general sampling distribution suitable in analysing this relationship. The most important feature of our assumptions is that the skewness of the conditional distribution of returns is used as an alternative source of relation between risk and return. This general specification relates to Skewed Generalized Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroscedastic-in-Mean model. In order to make conditional distribution of financial returns skewed we considered the unified approach based on the inverse probability integral transformation. In particular, we applied hidden truncation mechanism, inverse scale factors, order statistics concept, Beta and Bernstein distribution transformations and also a constructive method. Based on the daily excess returns on the Warsaw Stock Exchange Index we checked the empirical importance of the conditional skewness assumption on the relation between risk and return on the Warsaw Stock Market. We present posterior probabilities of all competing specifications as well as the posterior analysis of the positive sign of the tested relationship.
Keywords
EN
Contributors
author
  • Department of Econometrics, Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland
References
  • 1. R.C. Merton, Econometrica 41, 867 (1973)
  • 2. K.R. French, G.W. Schwert, R.F. Stambaugh, J. Financ. Econom. 19, 3 (1987)
  • 3. J.Y. Campbell, L. Hentschel, J. Financial Economics 31, 281 (1992)
  • 4. L.R. Glosten, R. Jagannathan, D.E. Runkle, J. Finance 48, 1779 (1993)
  • 5. R.F. Engle, D.M. Lilien, R.P. Robins, Econometrica 55, 391 (1987)
  • 6. J.T. Scruggs, J. Finance 53, 575 (1998)
  • 7. C.R. Harvey, A. Siddique, J. Finance 55, 1263 (2000)
  • 8. M. Pipień, Acta Phys. Pol. B 37, 3105 (2000)
  • 9. J. Osiewalski, M. Pipień, in: 26th Int. Conf. MACROMODELS'99, Eds. P. Wdowiński, W. Welfe, ABSOLWENT,Łódź2000, p. 354
  • 10. T. Bollerslev, J. Econometrics 31, 307 (1986)
  • 11. C. Fernández, M.F.J. Steel, J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 93, 359 (1998)
  • 12. B.E. Hansen, Int. Econom. Rev. 35, 705 (1994)
  • 13. A. Azzalini, Scandinav. J. Statistics 12, 171 (1985)
  • 14. M.C. Jones, Test 13, 1 (2004)
  • 15. J. Ferreira, M.F.J. Steel, J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 101, 823 (2006)
  • 16. M.C. Jones, M.J. Faddy, J. Roy. Statist. Assoc. B 65, 159 (2003)
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-appv114n304kz
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.