Modeling of Semiconductor Nanostructures with nextnano^3

• Authors: S. Birner , S. Hackenbuchner , M. Sabathil , G. Zandler , J. Majewski , T. Andlauer , T. Zibold , R. Morschl , A. Trellakis , P. Vogl
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

nextnano^3 is a simulation tool that aims at providing global insight into the basic physical properties of realistic three-dimensional mesoscopic semiconductor structures. It focuses on quantum mechanical properties such as the global electronic structure, optical properties, and the effects of electric and magnetic fields for virtually any geometry and combination of semiconducting materials. For the calculation of the carrier dynamics a drift-diffusion model based on a quantum-mechanically calculated density is employed. In this paper we present an overview of the capabilities of nextnano^3 and discuss some of the main equations that are implemented into the code. As examples, we first discuss the strain tensor components and the piezoelectric effect associated with a compressively strained InAs layer for different growth directions, secondly, we calculate self-consistently the quantum mechanical electron density of a Double Gate MOSFET, then we compare the intersubband transitions in a multi-quantum well structure that have been obtained with a single-band effective mass approach and with an 8-band k·p model, and finally, we calculate the energy spectrum of a structure in a uniform magnetic field.

Keywords

EN

73.43.Cd   73.21.Fg   73.61.Ey   77.65.Ly   85.30.Tv   73.40.Mr  

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2006
• Volume: 110
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 111-124

Dates

published

2006-08

received

2006-06-17

References

• 1. e.g. G. Snider's '1D Poisson' program available at http:/www.nd.edu/ gsnider/
• 2. e.g. O. Stier, M. Grundmann, D. Bimberg, Phys. Rev. B, 59, 5688, 1999
• 3. The nextnano^3 software can be obtained from http://www.wsi.tum.de/nextnano3 and http://www.nextnano.de
• 4. A. Trellakis, T. Zibold, T. Andlauer, S. Birner, R.K. Smith, R. Morschl, P. Vogl, J. Comp. Elec., in print
• 5. IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity, ANSI/IEEE Std 176-1987, 227, 1987
• 6. T.B. Bahder, Phys. Rev. B, 41, 11992, 1990
• 7. S.L. Chuang, C.S. Chang, Phys. Rev. B, 54, 2491, 1996
• 8. M. Sabathil, S. Hackenbuchner, J.A. Majewski, G. Zandler, P. Vogl, J. Comp. Elec., 1, 81, 2002
• 9. T. Kubis, P. Vogl, J. Comp. Elec., in print
• 10. R. Entner, A. Gehring, T. Grasser, S. Selberherr, in: Proc. IEEE 27th Intern. Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology, Vol. 1, Ed. P. Philippov, Sofia 2004, p. 114
• 11. P. Bergveld, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 17, 70, 1970
• 12. T.W. Healy, L.R. White, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 9, 303, 1978
• 13. M. Bayer, C. Uhl, P. Vogl, J. Appl. Phys., 97, 033703, 2005
• 14. C. Sirtori, F. Capasso, J. Faist, S. Scandolo, Phys. Rev. B, 50, 8663, 1994
• 15. I. Vurgaftman, J.R. Meyer, L.R. Ram-Mohan, J. Appl. Phys., 89, 5815, 2001
• 16. L.P. Kouwenhoven, D.G. Austing, S. Tarucha, Rep. Prog. Phys., 64, 701, 2001
• 17. M. Governale, C. Ungarelli, Phys. Rev. B, 58, 7816, 1998
• 18. S. Hackenbuchner, in: Selected Topics of Semiconductor Physics and Technology, Eds. G. Abstreiter, M.-C. Amann, M. Stutzmann, P. Vogl, Vol. 48, Walter Schottky Institute, TU Munich, Munich 2002, p. 132

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.110.111