Quantum Information Theory and Geometry of Quantum States

• Authors: M. Kuś
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The advantages of quantum information processing and transmission over corresponding classical operations are connected to the existence in composite quantum-mechanical systems states without classical counterparts - the so-called entangled states. The paper shows and examines various applications of entangled states in the quantum information theory. Recent results connected with characterization and geometry of entangled states are examined with the emphasis on some unsolved mathematical problems.

Keywords

EN

03.65.Ud; 03.67.-a

Discipline

• 03.65.Ud: Entanglement and quantum nonlocality (e.g. EPR paradox, Bell's inequalities, GHZ states, etc.)(for entanglement production and manipulation, see 03.67.Bg; for entanglement measures, witnesses etc., see 03.67.Mn; for entanglement in Bose-Einstein condensates, see 03.75.Gg)
• 03.67.-a: Quantum information(see also 42.50.Dv Quantum state engineering and measurements; 42.50.Ex Optical implementations of quantum information processing and transfer in quantum optics)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2001
• Volume: 100
• Issue: Supplement
• Pages: 43-56

Dates

published

2001-12

received

2001-11-05

Contributors

author

M. Kuś

• Centrum Fizyki Teoretycznej, Polska Akademia Nauk, al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warszawa, Poland

References

• 1. P.W. Shor, in: Proc. 35th Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Santa Fe 1994, p. 124
• 2. C.H. Bennet, G. Brassard, S. Briedbart, S. Wiesner, in: Advances in Cryptology: Proc. Crypto '82, Plenum Press, New York 1982, p. 267
• 3. A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 661, 1991
• 4. L.K. Grover, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 325, 1997
• 5. C.H. Bennet, S.J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 2881, 1992
• 6. C.H. Bennet, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 1895, 1993
• 7. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev., 47, 777, 1935
• 8. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Dover, New York 1989
• 9. J.S. Bell, Physics, 1, 195, 1964
• 10. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880, 1969
• 11. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1804, 1982
• 12. D. Deutsch, R. Jozsa, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 439, 553, 1992
• 13. V. Vedral, M. Plenio, Prog. Quantum Electron., 22, 1, 1998
• 14. R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A, 40, 4277, 1989
• 15. R.A. Horn, C.R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991
• 16. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 1413, 1996
• 17. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A, 223, 1, 1996
• 18. M. Lewenstein, D. Bruss, J.I. Cirac, B. Kraus, M. Kuś, J. Samsonowicz, A. Sanpera, R. Tarrach, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 2481, 2000
• 19. V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 1619, 1998
• 20. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 2245, 1998
• 21. M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 2261, 1998
• 22. T. Wellens, M. Kuś, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 052302, 2001
• 23. M. Kuś, K. Życzkowski, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 032307, 2001
• 24. M.M. Sinołęcka, K. Życzkowski, M. Kuś, to be published
• 25. P. Heinzner, A.T. Huckleberry, M. Kuś, K. Życzkowski, unpublished

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.100.43