PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 132 | 3 | 994-998
Article title

Performance Evaluation of Small-Medium Enterprises Based on Management and Organization

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Companies need to constantly evaluate their activities in strategic planning process. These activities include all processes in the company, such as management and organization, research and development, production planning, manufacturing, post-sales services, accounting and finance. The aim of this study is to propose an evaluation model that can be used to evaluate management and organization performance for small and medium enterprises. In the proposed model, fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approaches consisting of fuzzy analytic network process and fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory methods are used to determine the weights of performance criteria. A case study has been conducted in a small and medium enterprise for empirical evidence. From the outcome of our investigation, it is possible to conclude that "corporate communication" and "process management" are more important criteria. The most important sub-criteria are listed as, "senior management in harmony with each other", "employee requests and demands are collected periodically" and "pocket reference that includes procedures and fixed rules are available".
Keywords
EN
Year
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
994-998
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-09
References
  • [1] C.T. Walden, D.Sc Thesis, Mississippi State University, 2007
  • [2] D. Chen, S. Thiede, T. Schudeleit, C. Herrmann, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 63, 437 (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.113
  • [3] A. Susilawati, J. Tan, D. Bell, M. Sarwar, Int. J. Lean Think. 4, 51 (2013)
  • [4] G.K. Kanji, Total Qual. Manag. 13, 715 (2002), doi: 10.1080/0954412022000002090
  • [5] A.H.I. Lee, W.C. Chen, C.J. Chang, Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 96 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
  • [6] S. Perçin, Manag. Res. Rev. 33, 452 (2010), doi: 10.1108/01409171011041893
  • [7] G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 3000 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
  • [8] M. Kabak, M. Dagdeviren, Energy Convers. Manag. 79, 25 (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.036
  • [9] A. Jaafari, A. Najafi, M.G. Melón, Forest Policy Econ. 50, 200 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.010
  • [10] M.B. Erdem, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 331 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.331
  • [11] B. Tugrul, S. Cimen, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 87 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.87
  • [12] F.R. Lima-Junior, L.C.R. Carpinetti, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 174, 128 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.023
  • [13] R. Chalmeta, S. Palomero, M. Matilla, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25, 716 (2012), doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2012.665178
  • [14] P. Garengo, S. Biazzo, U.S. Bititci, Int. J. Manag. Rev. 7, 25 (2005), doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00105.x
  • [15] M. Hudson, A. Smart, M. Bourne, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21, 1096 (2001), doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005587
  • [16] E.K. Laitinen, G. Chong, Probl. Perspect. Manag. 4, 49 (2006)
  • [17] S.D. Sousa, E.M. Aspinwall, A.G. Rodrigues, Benchmark.: Int. J. 13, 120 (2006), doi: 10.1108/14635770610644628
  • [18] T. Canvar Kahveci, D.Sc Thesis, Sakarya University, 2007
  • [19] A. Brem, N. Kreusel, C. Neusser, Int. J. Glob. Small Bus. 2, 411 (2008), doi: 10.1504/IJGSB.2008.018102
  • [20] A. Ates, P. Garengo, P. Cocca, U.S. Bititci, J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 20, 28 (2013), doi: 10.1108/14626001311298402
  • [21] K.-F. Pun, Total Qual. Manag. 13, 759 (2002), doi: 10.1080/0954412022000010127
  • [22] H.-K. Chiou, G.-H. Tzeng, D.-C. Cheng, Omega 33, 223 (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.011
  • [23] J. Wei, R. Bi, in: Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Cybern., Kunming 2008, p. 257
  • [24] Y. Huang, J.C. Li, in: 2009 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Innov. Manag. Ind. Eng., China 2009, p. 277, doi: 10.1109/ICIII.2009.74
  • [25] H. Gao, in: 2010 Int. Conf. Logist. Syst. Intell. Manag., 2010, p. 273, doi: 10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461423
  • [26] M.-L. Tseng, Comput. Educ. 55, 188 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.004
  • [27] B. Mahapatra, K. Mukherjee, C. Bhar, J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 3, 26 (2015), doi: 10.12720/joams.3.1.26-30
  • [28] F.-H. Chen, G.-H. Tzeng, J. Test. Eval. 43, 924 (2015), doi: 10.1520/JTE20130181
  • [29] Ö. Uygun, T. Canvar Kahveci, H. Taşkin, B. Piriştine, Comput. Ind. Eng. 88, 217 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.008
  • [30] M. Zeydan, C. Çolpan, O. Taylan, in: Seventh Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst. Knowl. Discov., 2010, p. 2959
  • [31] L.A. Zadeh, Inf. Control. 8, 338 (1965), doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  • [32] N. Ibadov, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 107 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.107
  • [33] A. Gabus, E. Fontela, World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL, 1972
  • [34] A. Gabus, E. Fontela, Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility, 1973
  • [35] E. Fontela, A. Gabus, DEMATEL, innovative methods. Report No. 2 structural analysis of the world problematique, Battelle Geneva Res. Centre, Geneva 1974, p. 67
  • [36] E. Fontela, A. Gabus, The DEMATEL observer DEMATEL 1976 report, 1976
  • [37] C.J. Lin, W.W. Wu, Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 205 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012
  • [38] S. Opricovic, G.-H. Tzeng, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst. 11, 635 (2003), doi: 10.1142/S0218488503002387
  • [39] T.L. Saaty, Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh 1996
  • [40] D.-Y. Chang, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649 (1996), doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  • [41] EFQM Model Kriterleri, http://www.efqm.org/efqm-model/model-criteria, accessed December 16, 2014
  • [42] The Deming Prize, http://www.fr-deming.org/Demingprize.html, accessed February 28, 2016
  • [43] A. Genaidy, W. Karwowski, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 16, 61 (2007)
  • [44] S.K.M. Ho, C.K.H. Fung, Strateg. Chang. 4, 169 (1995), doi: 10.1002/jsc.4240040307
  • [45] G.K. Kanji, Total Qual. Manag. 12, 259 (2001), doi: 10.1080/09544120120025311
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-app132z3-iip050kz
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.