Selection of Construction Project Taking into Account Technological and Organizational Risk

• Authors: N. Ibadov
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

During the implementation of construction projects, there is permanently a certain level of technological and organizational risk. This is due to the fact that the data on conditions for a construction project tend to have different levels of uncertainty. Even the projects of the same size and terms of implementation vary. The failure risk of individual works results from technological and organizational factors, such as, for example, the difficulty of technological execution of individual works; availability of construction materials; the difficulty of the organization of individual works; availability of qualified personnel, availability of necessary machinery and equipment in the technology, etc. These factors affect the time and the cost of construction projects. When taking into account their influence, while selecting an option for construction project, it is crucial to maintain the contractual cost and time. An example of the option selection for construction project implementation is presented in this article, including technological and organizational risk, using the fuzzy sets theory and linguistic variables.

Keywords

EN

07.05.MH

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 132
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 974-977

Dates

published

2017-09

Contributors

author

N. Ibadov

• Warsaw University of Technology, The Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw, Poland

References

• [1] N. Ibadov, J. Rosłon, Arch. Civil Engin. 61, 105 (2015), doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0028
• [2] N. Ibadov, AIP Conf. Proc. 1738, 200005 (2016), doi: 10.1063/1.4951977
• [3] N. Ibadov, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 107 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.107
• [4] L.A. Zadeh, Inform. Control 8, 338 (1965), doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
• [5] D. Rutkowska, M. Piliński, L. Rutkowski, Sieci neuronowe, algorytmy genetyczne i systemy rozmyte, PWN, Warszawa 1997
• [6] R.R. Yager, D.P. Filev, Podstawy modelowania i sterowania rozmytego, WNT, Warszawa 1995
• [7] N.G. Adar, A. Egrisogut Tiryaki, R. Kozan, Acta Phys. Pol. A 128, B-348 (2015), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-348
• [8] I. Akkurt, C. Basyigit, S. Kilincarslan, A. Beycioglu, J. Franklin Inst. 347, 1589 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.06.002
• [9] A. Beycıoğlu, C. Başyığıt, Acta Phys. Pol. A 128, B-424 (2015), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-424
• [10] M. Bilgehan Erdem, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 331 (2016), doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.331
• [11] S. Subası, A. Beycioglu, E. Sancak, I. Sahin, Neural Comput. Applic. 22, 1133 (2013), doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-0879-4

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.132.974