PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2012 | 33 | 4 | 697-701
Article title

Evaluation of Biogas Collection from Reed Canary Grass, Depending on Nitrogen Fertilisation Levels

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The world in 21st century is facing the problem of growing energy consumption while the supply of fossil fuels is being reduced. This resulted in the development of research into the use of renewable energy sources and development of new technologies for energy production. In Polish conditions the development of agricultural biogas plants finds its legitimacy in the document developed by the Ministry titled "Trends in agricultural biogas plants in Poland in 2010-2020”. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the weather conditions and the degree of nitrogen fertilisation on yield of reed canary grass (Phalaris Arundinacea L.) and to determine their susceptibility to anaerobic digestion, and usefulness of the production of biogas. Carried out experiments showed that increasing nitrogen fertilisation (from 40 to 120 kg N/ha) linearly increased canary grass green biomass yield from 32 to 46.3 t/ha. However, the highest biogas yield 126 m3/ha was obtained when 80 kg N/ha was applied.
Keywords
Publisher
Year
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
697-701
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 12 - 2012
online
28 - 12 - 2012
References
  • Allison G., Morris C., Lister S., Barraclough T., Yates N., Shield I., Donnison I., 2012. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on cell wall composition in switchgrass and reed canary grass. Biomass Bioenergy, 40, 19- 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.034.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Burvall J., 1997. Influence of harvest time and soil type on fuel quality in red canary grass (Phalaris Arundinacea L.). Biomass Bioenergy, 12, 149-154. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00064-5.[Crossref]
  • Ceotto E., Di Candilo M., 2011. Sustainable bioenergy production, land and nitrogen use, In: Lichtfouse E. (Ed.), Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture. Sustainable agriculture reviews, 5, 101-22. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9513-8_3.[Crossref]
  • Erisman J.W., van Grinsven H., Leip A., Mosier A., Bleeker A., 2010. Nitrogen and biofuels; an overview of the current state of knowledge. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 86, 211-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-009-9285-4.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Gunnarsson C., Vagström L., Hansson P.A., 2008. Logistics for forage harvest to biogas production - Timeliness, capacities and costs in a Swedish case study. Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 1263-1273. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.03.004.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Heinsoo K., Hein K., Melts I., Holm B., Ivask M., 2011. Reed canary grass yield and fuel quality in Estonian farmers’ fields. Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 617-625. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.022.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Kopiński J., Matyka M., Madej A., 2011. Influence of environmental conditions on the profitability of maize cultivation for biogas. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA, 13, , 35-38.
  • Sanderson M.A., Adler P.R., 2008. Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 9, 768-78. DOI: 10.3390/ijms9050768.[PubMed][WoS][Crossref]
  • Vepsäläinen V., 2010. Energy crop cultivations of reed canary grass - An inferior breeding habitat for the skylark, a characteristic farmland bird species. Biomass Bioenergy, 34, 993-998. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.007.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Wang D., Lebauer D.S., Dietze M.C., 2010. A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg., 2, 16- 25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01035.x.[Crossref]
  • ---
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10176-012-0059-1
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.