PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2011 | 3 | 2 | 129-134
Article title

Reconsidering on the Early Types of Football

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
According to certain assumptions, physical activities all over the world from the antiquity until the 19th century can be considered as the historical origins of modern football (soccer). The present study examines whether and to what extent those assumptions hold true. In order to criticize these assumptions, a discussion whether ancient and pre-modern activities can be considered as sports is presented. Then, the morphological movement similarity that those activities have with modern football is examined. Finally, a discussion about to what extent the history of these activities is characterized by a continuous developing progress is undertaken. According to our argument these assumptions cannot be supported because the morphological movement similarity of those activities does not immediately imply their placement in the same category when this category refers to the phenomena of civilization. On the contrary, it is the aim those activities serve and, mostly, the meaning attributed to them that constitute the essential elements that need to be examined before arriving at a conclusion that they belong to the same category of the phenomena of civilization. Thus, physical activities all over the world from the antiquity until the 19th century cannot be considered as the historical origins of the modern football.
Publisher

Year
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
129-134
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 1 - 2011
online
4 - 7 - 2011
Contributors
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Athens, Greece
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Athens, Greece
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Athens, Greece
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Athens, Greece
References
  • Encyclopedia "Neotero Egyglopaidiko lexico Helios", 8th tome. p. 81.
  • Marindin GE. The Game of ‘Harpastum’ or ‘Pheninda’. Classical Rev 1890;4(4):145-149 available at http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0009-840X(189004)1%3A4%3A4%3C145%3ATGO'O'%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E.
  • Olivova V. Sports and games in the ancient world. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1984.
  • Simri U. The ancient Chinese kicking game and it is remnants. Can J Hist Sport Phys Educ 1973;4(1):58-62.
  • Blom F. The Maya ball game pok-a-tok. Middle American Research Series 1932;4:487-527.
  • Cox A. An historical analysis of competitive rubber ball games in Mesoamerican, Arizona and the Greater Antilles. M.A. thesis. University of Alberta; 1967.
  • Fox JG, Ashmore W, Blitz JH, et al. Playing with power: ballcourts and political ritual in Southern Mesoamerica. Curr Anthropol 1996:37(3):483-509.[Crossref]
  • Henderson R, Koppett L. Ball, bat and bishop: the origin of ball games. Illinois: Univ. of Illinois Press; 2001.
  • Tollinger M. Calcio Fiorentino Revisited: A bibliographical puzzle finally solved. Int J Hist Sport 2000; 17(4):81-92.[Crossref]
  • Beker W. Sports in the Western World. Chicago: University of Illinois Press; 1988.
  • Marples M. A history of football. London: Secker and Warburg; 1954.
  • Healy P. Gaelic games and the Gaelic Athletic Association. Boulder, CO: Irish American Book Company; 1998.
  • Tokuro Y. Kemari - a traditional sports culture in Japan. In: Pfister G, editor. Games of the past-sports for the future? Globalisation. Diversification, Transformation. Proceedings of the 4th ISHPES/TAFISA Seminar, Duderstadt, Germany; 2004, 74-79.
  • Roshe S. Indigenous games of Indonesia: Preservation of local culture. Int J Phys Educ 1990;27(3):28-34.
  • Moore G, Wills T, Marngrook and the evolution of Australian football
  • Blainey G. A game of our own: The origins of Australian football. Melbourne: Information Australia; 1990.
  • Prior I. The history of Gaelic Games. Belfast, Ireland: Appletree Press; 1997.
  • Suits B. The elements of sport. In: Morgan WJ, Meier KV, editors. Philosophic inquiry in sport, Champaign Il: Human Kinetics; 1995, 8-15.
  • Schneider A. Fruits, apples, and category mistakes: on sport, games, and play. J Philos Sport 2001;28(2) available at https://www.humankinetics.com/JPS/viewarticle.cfm?jid=R64QEHJxn636bUaUYf2xLCyF7A2RqF47ArD3cz8FVLC3hVxd7R&view=art&aid=2834&R64QEHJxn636bUaUYf2xLCyF7A2RqF47ArD3cz8FVLC3hVxd7Rsite
  • Skavatzos K. Athlhna, Paignion and Sport. In: Proceedings of 2nd Panellinion Conference of Athletic History and Philosophy (Larisa 19-21 March). 2004; 45-55.
  • Loy JW, Booth D. Fuctionalism, sport and society. In: Coakley J, Duming E, editors. Handbook of sports studies. London; 2000, 8-27.
  • Lü schen G. The independence of sport and culture. Int Rev Soc Sport 1967;2:127-141.
  • Lü schen G. The system of sport: problems of methodology, conflict and social stratification. In: Luschen G, Sage GH, editors. Handbook of social science of sport, Champaign IL: Stipes Publishing Co; 1981, 197-213.
  • Beikos Th. Theory and methodology of history. Athens: Themelio; 1987.
  • Lemon MC. The philosophy of history: guide for students. New York: Rutledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2003.
  • Struna NL. Social history and sport. In: Coakley J, Duming E, editors. Handbook of sports studies, London: Sage Publications; 2000, 187-203.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10131-011-0013-5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.