Generational differences in the motivational factors that drive Cypriots to participate in sporting activities

• Authors: Efstathios Christodoulides
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Study aim: To examine the factors that motivate Cypriots to participate in sport, particularly examining the differences between the last 3 generations regarding their motivations for sport involvement at the present and at the ages of 12-18 years.Material and methods: The study was completed by survey method among 3 generational groups in Cyprus comprised of secondary school students, their parents, and their grandparents (N=1067). Data were collected via questionnaires that contained 3 open-ended, 16 multiple-choice, and 12 semantic differential scale questions. The response rate was 100% for the students, 77.4% for the parents, and 65.5% for the grandparents. The data were analyzed by the SPSS program for Microsoft Windows; factor analysis and one-way analysis of variance were used.Results: The examined motivations were clustered into two factors: Joy Factor and Health Factor. Significant differences were found among the 3 generations in their sporting activities at present and the ages of 12-18 years. The students' participation motivations for sport are closely related to fun and enjoyment. Their parents have similar motives at present, but in their childhood they considered health enhancement as the most important reason for sport involvement. The oldest generation regarded the improvement of their health as a stimulating factor for sport in their childhood and youth; they did not change this during their whole life cycle.Conclusions: Generational differences in the motivation for participation in sport are probably universal, but their elements are dissimilar depending on the value system in general and in sport in societies. The historical and cultural circumstances in Cyprus allow for the generalization of the conclusions only at the national level.

Keywords

EN

Sport participation; Motivation; Generational group; Value transmission

• Publisher: Versita
• Journal: Biomedical Human Kinetics
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 4
• Pages: 54-60

Dates

published

1 - 1 - 2012

online

24 - 7 - 2012

Contributors

author

Efstathios Christodoulides

• Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

References

• Alexopoulos A. (2005) Recent sport-political decisions of the Council of Europe and Cypriot sport: A preliminary study. In: S. G. Foldesi, A. Gal (eds.) New Social Conditions in Sport 1990-2005. Hungarian Society for Sport Sciences, Budapest, pp. 50-70.
• Allen B. J. (2003) Social motivation in youth sport. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 25:551-567.
• Baar P. (2001) Organized sport programs for children: do they meet the interests of the children effectively. In: J. Steenbergen, P. De Knop, A. Elling (eds) Values and Norms in Sport, Critical Reflections on the Position and Meanings of Sport in Society. Meyer and Meyer Sport, Aachen, pp. 323-336.
• Christodoulides E. (2012) Impact of socializing factors on three Cypriot generations (in Hungarian). Magy. Sporttud. Szle., 13:11-17.
• Foldesi S. G. (1982) Sport in the hierarchy of values. (in Polish) Kult. Fiz. 4-6:27-30.
• Frederick M. C., M. R. Richard (1993) Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. J. Sport Behav., 16(3): 124-146.
• Gill K., V. Overdorf (1974) Incentives for exercise in younger and older women. J. Sport Behav., 17(2):87-97.
• Gal A. (2005) Sociological aspects of mediated women's sports. In: S. G. Foldesi, A. Gal (eds.) New Social Conditions in Sport 1990-2005. Hungarian Society for Sport Sciences, Budapest, pp. 94-115.
• Hardman E. A., J. D. Stensel (2003) Physical Activity and Health: The Evidence Explained. Routledge, London.
• Ibrahim, R. A. (2012) Motives of physical activity in elderly. World J. Sport Sci., 6: 62-66.
• Izzo G. M., C. Munteanu, B. E. Langford, C. Ceobanu, I. Dumitru, F. Nichifor (2011) Sport fans'motivations: an investigation of Romanian soccer spectators. J. Int. Bus. Cult. Stud., 5. www.aabri.com/jibcs.html
• McCrindle M. (2008) Engaging with the new generations. Sports Coach, 30(1):1-3.
• Murcia M. A. J., L. M. Román, M. C. Galindo, N. Alonso, G. D. Cutre (2008) Peers' influence on exercise enjoyment: A self-determination theory approach. J. Sports Sci. Med. 7: 23-31.
• Pudelkiewicz E. (1974) A need of sociological research on the problem of sport in housing estate in a family of three generations. In: I. Baly, F. Takács (eds) Sportszociológia. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest, pp. 279-289.
• Special Eurobarometer on Sport and Physical Activity. (2010) European Commission, Bruxelles.
• Steenbergen J. (2001) The double character of sport. In: J. Steenbergen, P. De Knop, A. Elling. Values and Norms in Sport, Critical Reflections on the Position and Meanings of Sport in Society. Meyer and Meyer Sport, Aachen, pp. 33-56.
• Stewart B., A. Smith (2000) Australian sport in a postmodern age. Int. J. Hist. Sport 17:2-3.
• Struna L. N. (2000) Social history and sport. In: J. Coakley, E. Dunning (eds.) Handbook of Sport Studies. Sage Publications, London, pp. 187-203.
• Williamson D. J., S. H. Song (2011) Understanding generational differences in sport administration: creating a cohesive work environment. Sport Entertainment & Venues Tomorrow. Conference abstracts, 32-34. www.hrsm.sc.edu/SEVT/PDFs/2011 SEVT PDFs/2011 SEVT Ab.
• Volkwein A. E. K. (2000) Fitness as cultural phenomenon. In: J. Tolleneer, R. Renson (eds.) Old Borders, New Borders, No Borders: Sport and Physical Education in a Period of Change. Meyer and Meyer Sport, Aachen, pp. 83-94.
• Zopiatis A., M. K. Kapardis, A. P. Varnavas, I. Pavlou (2010) Are X-ers from Mars and Y-ers from venus? Generations under the Microscope. The EuroCHRIE, Amsterdam 2010 Conference Proceedings. http://www.eurochrie2010.nl/publications/118.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10101-012-0010-4