PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2011 | 28 | 115-122
Article title

Coach Mid-Season Replacement and Team Performance in Professional Soccer

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The coaching carousel or turnover is an extreme but frequently occurring phenomenon in soccer. Among the reasons for firing a coach, the most common is the existence of a shock-effect: a new coach would be able to motivate the players better and therefore to improve results. Using data from the Spanish Soccer League during the seasons from 1997-1998 to 2006-2007, this paper investigates the relationship between team performance and coach change over time. The empirical analysis shows that the shock effect of a turnover has a positive impact on team performance in the short term. Results reveal no impact of coach turnover in the long term. The favourable short-term impact on team performance of a coach turnover is followed by continued gradual worsening of results. The turnover effect is non-existent when the comparison between the new coach and the old coach is done over 10, 15 or 20 matches before and after termination.
Publisher
Year
Volume
28
Pages
115-122
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 6 - 2011
online
4 - 7 - 2011
References
  • Allen M, Panian SK, Lotz RE. Managerial succession and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Admin Sci Quart, 1979; 24:167-180.[Crossref]
  • Audas R, Dobson S, Goddard, J. Team performance and managerial change in the English Football League. Econ Aff, 1997; 17: 30-36.[Crossref]
  • Audas R, Dobson S, Goddard J. Organizational performance and managerial turnover. Managel Deci Econ, 1999; 20: 305-318.[Crossref]
  • Audas R, Dobson S, Goddard, J. The impact of managerial change on team performance in professional sports. J Econ Bus, 2002; 54, 633-650.[Crossref]
  • Balduck AL, Buelens M. Does sacking the coach help or hinder the team in the short term? Evidence from Belgian soccer. Working Paper. 2007, Universiteit Gent.
  • Bennet G, Phillips J, Drane D, Sagas M. The coaching carousel: Turnover effects on winning in professional sport. Int J Sports Man, 2003; 4: 194-204.
  • Brown MC. Administrative succession and organizational performance: The succession effect. Admin Sci Quart, 1982; 27: 1-16.[Crossref]
  • Bruinshoofd A, Ter Weel B. Manager to go? Performance dips reconsidered with evidence from Dutch football. Eur J Oper Res, 2003: 148, 233-246.
  • Cannella AA, Rowe WG. Leader capabilities, succession and competitive context. A study of professional Baseball Team. Leadership Quart, 1995; 6: 69-88.[Crossref]
  • Curtis JE, Loy LW, Hillen JM. Managerial succession and team effectiveness: a case study of Japanese professional baseball. Intl Rev Soc Sports, 1986; 21: 339-351.[Crossref]
  • Eitzen DS, Yetman NR. Managerial change, longevity and organizational effectiveness. Admin Sci Quart, 1972; 17: 110-116.[Crossref]
  • Fabianic D. Organizational effectiveness and managerial succession: An update of an old problem. J Motor Behav, 1984; 7: 139-152.
  • Fabianic D. Managerial change and organizational effectiveness in Major League Baseball: findings for the eighties. J Motor Beh, 1994; 17: 135-148
  • Gamson WA, Scotch NA. Scapegoating in baseball. Am J Sociol, 1964; 70: 69-72.[Crossref]
  • Grusky O. Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness. Am J Sociol, 1963; 69: 21-31.[Crossref]
  • Kesner IF, Sebora TC. Executive succession. Past, present and future. J Manag, 1994; 20: 327-372.[WoS]
  • Koning RH. An econometric evaluation of the effect of firing a coach on team performance. App Econ, 2003; 25: 555-564.[Crossref]
  • McTeer W, White PG. Managerccoach mid-season replacement and team performance in professional team sport. J Sport Behav, 1995; 18: 58-69.
  • Nevill A, Holder R, Atkinson G, Copas J. The dangers of reporting spurious regression to the mean. J Sports Sci, 2004; 22, 800-802.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Pfeffe J, Davis-Blake A. Administration succession and organizational performance. How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Acad Manage J, 1986; 29: 72-83.[Crossref]
  • Rowe WG, Canella AA, Rankin D, Gorman D. Leader succession and organizational performance. Integrating the common-sense, ritual scapegoating and vicious-circle succession theories. Leadership Quart, 2005; 16: 187-219.
  • Scully GW. The market structure of sports, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • Theberghe N, Loy J. Replacement process in sport organizations: the case of professional baseball. Int Rev Sport Sociol, 1976; 11: 73-93.[Crossref]
  • Van Dalen HP. Loont her om een voetbaltrainer te ontslaan? Econ Stat Ber, 1994; 17: 1089-1092.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10078-011-0028-7
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.