PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2010 | 26 | 39-44
Article title

Which Factors Affect Hand Selection in Adults? Combined Effects of Ocular Dominance, Task Demand and Object Location

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Eighty-five right-handed subjects (39 female and 46 male, 47 being right-eye dominant and 38 being left-eye dominant) were tested on three tasks of different levels of difficulty, performed in five locations. In the current study, participants were required to pick up the tool, pick up and pantomime how to use it and pick up and actual use on the materials provided. Our goal was to evaluate how the effect of object location interacts with task difficulty on adult hand selection. We also tried to evaluate the effect of eye dominance as a biological factor on hand selection. The result showed that the frequency of preferred hand reaches was greater for pantomime and real use than the pick up condition. This effect was mediated by the position of the object in hemispace, with more right hand reaches occurring for the use and pantomime task than the pick up task. The result also revealed that there is no difference between frequency of preferred hand reaches in left- and right-eye dominant. Based on results of this study, it can be suggested that limb selection depends on task and environmental constraints, rather than a biological factor like eye dominance.
Publisher

Year
Volume
26
Pages
39-44
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 12 - 2010
online
17 - 1 - 2011
Contributors
author
  • Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • University of Alzahra, Tehran, Iran
  • Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
author
  • University of Rehabilitation and Welfare Science, Tehran
References
  • Annett M. The classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol. 1970 Aug; 61(3):303-21. No abstract available.[Crossref]
  • Bradshaw JL, Willmott CJ, Umiltà C, Phillips JG, Bradshaw JA, Mattingley JB. Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):170-8.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Bryden, E. Roy, Mamolo CM. The effects of skill demands and object characteristics on the distribution of preferred hand reaches in working space, Brain and Cognition 53 (2003), pp. 111-112.
  • Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. nvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Aug; 45(8):2856-60.[PubMed]
  • Coren S. Sensorimotor performance as a function of eye dominance and handedness. Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Apr; 88(2):424-6.[PubMed]
  • Doyen AL, Dufour T, Caroff X, Cherfouh A, Carlier M. Hand preference and hand performance: Cross-sectional developmental trends and family resemblance in degree of laterality. Laterality. 2008 Mar; 13(2):179-97.[PubMed][WoS][Crossref]
  • Gabbard C, Iteya M, Rabb C. A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. Can J Exp Psychol. 1997 Jun;51(2):176-80.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Gabbard C, Tapia M, Helbig CR. Task complexity and limb selection in reaching. Int J Neurosci. 2003 Feb; 113(2):143-52.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Gabbard C, Helbig CR. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace? Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156 (3):325-32. Epub 2004 Jan 27[Crossref]
  • Gabbard C, Rabb C, Gentry V. Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective. Int J Neurosci. 1998 Dec; 96(3-4):205-15.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Ghasemi A, Momeni M Rezaee m, Gholami A. The Difference in visual Skills between expert versus novice soccer referees. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2009(22), 15-20
  • Geschwind DH, Miller BL, CeCarli C, Carmelli D Herita-bility of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic modelsof cerebral laterality and handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002. 99:3176-3181
  • Helbig CR, Gabbard C. What determines limb selection for reaching? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004 Mar; 75(1):47-59.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Hill EL, Khanem F. The development of hand preference in children: the effect of task demands and links with manual dexterity. Brain Cogn. 2009 Nov; 71(2):99-107. Epub 2009 May 19.[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Hofeldt AJ, Hoefle FB, Bonafede B. Baseball hitting, binocular vision, and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Dec; 114(12):1490-4.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Leconte P, Fagard J. Influence of object spatial location and task complexity on children's use of their preferred hand depending on their handedness consistency. 2004. Dev Psychobiol.; 45(2):51-8[Crossref]
  • Leconte P, Fagard J. Which factors affect hand selection in children's grasping in hemispace? Combined effects of task demand and motor dominance. Brain and Cognition 2006, Pages 88-93
  • Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Rohr LE, Bryden PJ. Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels. Laterality. 2006 Sep; 11(5):465-92[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE. The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul; 55(2):349-51[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Newell, KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control. 1986. (341-360). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Porac C, Coren S. Is eye dominance a part of generalized laterality? Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Jun;40(3):763-9.[PubMed]
  • Porac C, Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychol Bull. 1976 Sep; 83(5):880-97.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Pryde KM, Bryden PJ, Roy EA. A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: I. Preferentiaal reaching into hemispace. Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug; 43(1-3):370-4.[PubMed]
  • Rice ML, Leske DA, Smestad CE, Holmes JM. Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method. J AAPOS. 2008 Aug; 12(4):365-9. Epub 2008 May 2.[PubMed][WoS][Crossref]
  • Shneor E, Hochstein S. Eye dominance effects in conjunction search. Vision Res. 2008 Jul; 48(15):1592-602.[Crossref][PubMed][WoS]
  • Shneor E, Hochstein S. Eye dominance effects in feature search. Vision Res. 2006 Nov; 46(25):425869.[WoS]
  • Steingrueber HJ. Handedness as a function of test complexity. Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Feb;40(1):2636.
  • Sugiyama Y, Lee MS. Relation of eye dominance with performance and subjective ratings in golf putting. Percept Mot Skills. 2005 Jun;100(3 Pt 1):761-6.[PubMed]
  • van Hof R, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJ. The relation of unimanual and bimanual reaching to crossing the midline. Child Dev. 2002 Sep-Oct;73(5):1353-62.[Crossref]
  • Van Strien. Origins of human handedness.in: Mandal M, Bulman-Fleming B, Tiwari G (eds) Side bias: a neuropsychological prespective. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000. pp 41-62
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10078-010-0046-x
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.