PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 20 | 131-138
Article title

Pedometers as a Method for Modification of Physical Activity in Students

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Developing the awareness of one's level of physical activity is an important prerequisite to change one's lifestyle into a more physically active and healthy style of living. The aim of the study is to verify the efficacy of pedometers in educational environments and to specify the differences between physical activity in boys and girls aged 17. Twenty seven boys and thirty seven girls from randomly selected classes in two high schools in Katowice, Poland participated in the study. Students wore Yamax SW-700 pedometers for three weeks, continuously recorded data from the pedometers, and used the motivational feedback booklets. The three-week intervention using pedometers was complemented with the IPAQ questionnaire to assess their physical activity during the last seven days.For statistical analysis, we used basic statistical characteristics, Mann-Whitney test, repeated ANOVA, "effect size" coefficient ω2 (Tolson, 1980), and other partial analysis programs in Statistica 6 and SPSS 15.Both boys and girls were less physically active on weekend days during the analyzed period. The use of pedometers did not decrease the difference between physical activity on school days and weekend days. No significant differences were found in the average number of steps per day between boys and girls, as well as no significant differences were identified in the interaction of gender vs. school and weekend days.Additional study is necessary to confirm whether the use of pedometers in physical education classes can help decrease the differences in physical activity between boys and girls.
Publisher
Year
Volume
20
Pages
131-138
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 1 - 2008
online
13 - 1 - 2009
References
  • Amstrong N., & Welsman J. R. The physical activity patterns of European youth with reference to methods of assessment. Sports Medicine, 2006. 36(12), 1067-1086.[Crossref]
  • Bedimo-Rung A. L., Mowen A. J., & Cohen D. A. The significance of praks to physical activity and public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005. 28(2S2), 159-168.[Crossref]
  • Burgeson C. R., Wechsler H., Brener N. D., Young J. C., & Spain C. G. Physical education and activity: Results from the school health policies and programs study 2000. Journal of School Health, 2001. 71, 279-293.
  • Cavill N., Biddle S., & Sallis J. F. Health enhancing physical activity for young people: Statement of the United Kingdom expert consensus conference. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2001. 13, 12-25.
  • Chan C. B, Tudor-Locke C. Real-world evaluation of a community-based pedometer intervention. Journal of Physical Acticity and Health, 2008. 5, 648-664.
  • Corbin C. B., Welk G. J., Corbin W. R., & Welk K. A. Fitness i wellness. Kondycja, sprawność, zdrowie. Wydawnictwo: Zysk i s-ka. 2007.
  • Craig C. L, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercises, 2003. 35, 1381-1395.
  • Cull A. Sprangers M., Bjordal K., Aaronson, N, West K., & Bottomley A. (2002). Eortc quality of life group tranlation procedure. Brussels: EORTC Quality of Life Unit.
  • Fairclough S. J., Stratton G. ‘Physical education makes you fit and healthy’. Physical education's contribution to young people's physical activity levels. Health Education Research, 2005. 20(1), 14-23.[PubMed]
  • Frömel K., Novosad J., & Svozil Z. Pohybová aktivita a sportovní zájmy mládeže. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. 1999.
  • Jackson A. W., Morrow J. R., Jr., Hill D. W., & Dishman R. K. Physical activity for health and fitness: An individualized lifetime approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 1999.
  • Lubans D. R., Morgan P. J., Callister R. & Collins C. Effects of integrating pedometers, parental materials, and e-mail support within an extracurricular school sport intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health 2008. (in press).[WoS]
  • Marcus B. H., & Forsyth L. H. Motivating people to be physically active. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2003.[WoS]
  • Mc Kenzie T. L., Catellier D. J., Conway T., Lytle L. A., Grieser M., Webber L. A., Pratt, & C. A., Elder J. P. Girls' activity levels and lesson contexts in middle school PE: TAAG baseline. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercises, 2006. 38(7), 1229-1235.
  • Oliver M., Schofield G., & McEvoy E. (). An integrated curriculum approach to increasing habitual physical activity in children: A feasibility study. The Journal of School Health, 2006. 76 (2), 74-79.[Crossref]
  • Pangrazi R. P., Beighle A., & Sidman C. L. Pedometer power: 67 lessons for K-12. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2003.
  • Sallis J. F., & Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (pp. 462-484). San Francisco, CA: Published by Jossey-Bass 2002.
  • Sallis J. F., & Owen N. Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oakc, CA: Sage Publications 1999.
  • Schofield L., Mummery W. K., & Schifield G. Effects of a controlled pedometer-intervention trial for low-active adolescent girls. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercises, 2005. 37(8), 1414-1420.
  • Stone E. J., McKenzie T. L., Welk G. J., & Booth M. L. Effects of physical activity interventions in youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998. 15(4), 298-315.[Crossref]
  • Tolson H. An adjunct to statistical significance: ω2. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1980. 51(3), 580-584.[Crossref]
  • Tudor-Locke K., Lee S. M., Morgan C. F., Beighle A., & Pangrazi R. Children's Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity during the Segmented School Day. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercises, 2006. 38(10), 1732-1738.[WoS]
  • Welk G. J. The role of physical activity assessment for school-based physical activity promotion. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2008. 12, 184-206.
  • Zimring C., Joseph A., Nicoll G. L., & Tsepas S. Influences of building design and site design on physical activity: Research and intervention opportunities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005. 28(2S2), 186-193.[Crossref]
  • Zizzi S. et al. Impact of a three-week pedometer intervention on high school students' daily step counts and perceptions of physical activity. American Journal of Health Education, 2006. 37 (1), 35-40.[Crossref]
  • Zhu W. Promoting physical activity using technology. Research Digest, 2008. 9 (3), 1-8.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10078-008-0025-7
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.