Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results


2012 | 13 | 3 | 218-224

Article title

Functional relationships between gaze behavior and movement kinematics when performing high bar dismounts – an exploratory study


Title variants

Languages of publication



Purpose. The aims of this study were, first, to investigate visual spotting and, second, to explore the functional relationships between movement structure and gaze behavior in gymnasts as they perform preparatory giant swings (traditional and scooped technique) and dismounts (single straight and double tucked salto) with increasing difficulty on the high bar. It was predicted that visual spotting would occur in all experimental tasks. Methods. Relationships between gaze behavior and movement kinematics were explored to provide a clearer picture of how gaze is interconnected with the kinematics of dismounts on the high bar. For this purpose, kinematic parameters were measured with an optical movement-analysis system while gaze behavior was measured by using a portable and wireless eye-tracking system. Results. The measurement of gaze behavior revealed that gymnasts use visual spotting in all three tasks showing fixations throughout the whole movement. Each task was furthermore characterized by a sequence of visual fixations that was thought to serve specific movement goals. In particular, fixations during the downswing phase of the preparatory giant swings were significantly correlated with the movement phases when beginning the hip extension and flexion in the “kick through” as well as with the athlete’s distance of flight during the dismounts. Conclusions. The findings suggest that gymnasts can use visual spotting during preparatory giant swings and dismounts on the high bar and that there are functional relationships between different fixations and specific movement goals.











Physical description


1 - 10 - 2012
01 - 11 - 2012


  • Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Hildesheim Marienburger Platz 22, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany
  • Bielefeld University, Germany
  • Leibniz University, Hanover, Germany


  • 1. Davlin C.D., Sands W.A., Shultz B.B., Do gymnasts “spot” during a back tuck somersault? Int Sport J, 2004, 8 (2), 72-79.
  • 2. Vickers J.N., Perception, cognition and decision training: The quiet eye in action. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2007.
  • 3. Land M.F., Furneaux S., The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. Phil Trans R Soc B, 1997, 352, 1231-1239.
  • 4. Davlin C.D., Sands W.A., Shultz B.B., The role of vision in control of orientation in a back tuck somersault. MotorControl, 2001, 5 (4), 337-346.
  • 5. Hondzinski J.M., Darling W.G., Aerial somersault performance under three visual conditions. Motor Control, 2001, 5 (3), 281-300.[PubMed]
  • 6. Luis M., Tremblay L., Visual feedback use during a back tuck somersault: Evidence for optimal visual feedback utilization. Motor Control, 2008, 12 (3), 210-218.[PubMed]
  • 7. Wulf G., Attention and motor skill learning. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2007.
  • 8. R oy F.D., Tomlinson R.D., Characterization of the vestibulo- ocular reflex evoked by high velocity movements. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114 (7), 1190-1193, doi: 10.1097/ 00005537-200407000-00011.[Crossref]
  • 9. von Laßberg C., Mühlbauer T., Krug J., Spatial orientation during fast body rotations in horizontal plane. In: Schöllhorn W.L., Bohn C., Jäger J.M., Schaper H., Alichmann M. (eds.), European workshop on movement science. Mechanics - physiology - psychology. Sport und Buch Strauß, Cologne 2003, 96.
  • 10. R aab M., de Oliveira R.F., Heinen T., How do people perceive and generate options? In: Raab M., Hekeren H., Johnson J.G. (eds.), Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 174. Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action, Elsevier, Amsterdam 2009, 49-59, doi: 10.1016/ S0079-6123(09)01305-3.[Crossref]
  • 11. Hayhoe M., Ballard D., Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn Sci, 2005, 9 (4), 188-194, doi: 10.1016/ j.tics.2005.02.009.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 12. Jovancevic-Misic J., Hayhoe M., Adaptive gaze control in natural environments. J Neurosci, 2009, 29 (19), 6234- 6238, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSC I.5570-08.2009.[Crossref][WoS]
  • 13. Grasso R., Prévost P., Ivanenko Y.P., Berthoz A., Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy. Neurosci Lett, 1998, 253 (2), 115-118, doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00625-9.[Crossref]
  • 14. Hollands M.A., Patla A.E., Vickers J.N., “Look where you’re going!”: gaze behaviour associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion. ExpBrain Res, 2002, 143 (2), 221-230, doi: 10.1007/s00221- 001-0983-7.[Crossref]
  • 15. Williams A.M., Davids K., Williams J.G.P., Visual perception and action in Sport. E. & F.N. Spon, London 1999.
  • 16. Kerwin D., Swinging in gymnastics. In: Prassas S., Sanders R. (eds.), Proceedings of the XVII international symposium on biomechanics in sports: Acrobatics. Edith Cowan University, Perth 1999, 49-59.
  • 17. Hiley M.J., Yeadon M.R., The margin for error when releasing the high bar for dismounts. J Biomech, 2003, 36 (3), 313-319, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00431-1.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 18. Hiley M.J., Yeadon M.R., Optimization of backward giant circle technique on the asymmetric bars. J Appl Biomech, 2007, 23 (4), 300-308.[PubMed]
  • 19. Arampatzis A., Brüggemann G.-P., Mechanical energetic processes during the giant swing exercise before dismounts and flight elements on the high bar and the uneven parallel bars. J Biomech, 1999, 32 (8), 811-820, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00065-2.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 20. Mikromak, WINanalyze 3D (ver. 2.1.1). Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  • 21. Busquets A., Marina M., Irurtia A., Ranz D., Angulo-Barroso R.M., High bar swing performance in novice adults: Effects of practice and talent. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2011, 82 (1), 9-20.[Crossref]
  • 22. Abernethy B., Russell D.G., The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Hum Mov Sci, 1987, 6 (4), 283-319, doi: 10.1016/0167- 9457(87)90001-7.[Crossref]
  • 23. Bates B.T., James R., Dufek J.S., Single-subject analysis. In: Stergiou N. (ed.), Innovative analyses of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2004, 3-28.
  • 24. Land M.F., Mennie N., Rusted J., The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 1999, 28 (11), 1311-1328, doi: 10.1068/ p2935.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 25. Williams A.M., Ericsson K.A., Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Hum Mov Sci, 2005, 24 (3), 283-307, doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 26. Pelz J.B., Canosa R., Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks. Vision Res, 2001, 41, 3587- 3596, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00254-0.[Crossref]
  • 27. Foley H.J., Matlin M.W., Sensation and perception. Pearson Education, Boston 2010.
  • 28. Elliott D., Lyons J., Optimizing the use of vision during motor skill acquisition. In: Piek J. (ed.), Motor behavior and human skill: a multidisciplinary approach. Human Kinetics, Champaign 1998, 57-72.
  • 29. C ohen J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, New York 1988.
  • 30. Kenny D.A., Correlation and causality, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1979.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.