PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2012 | 13 | 1 | 48-53
Article title

The Influence of the Way of Planning Teaching Content on the Effectiveness of Mastering Self-Defence Techniques

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Introduction. The improvement of a learning process through transferring a skill already acquired to another one which is being learnt is one of the factors contributing to increasing the effectiveness of teaching. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of teaching performed on the basis of two plans, i.e. a traditional (intuitive) one and a network one. Methods. A pedagogical experiment covering 13 weekly sessions of self-defence elements were taught. The control group was taught according to an algorithm developed in a traditional (intuitive) way, whereas the experimental group was taught according to a algorithm developed on the network model. After the sessions had been completed, five experts evaluated the acquisition level of three randomly selected elements. The results obtained by 32 men (average age 21.29 ± 0.76 years) from the experimental group and 32 men from the control group (average age 21.18 ± 0.87 years) were analysed statistically with the Student's t-test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Fisher post-hoc test. Results. The experts did not differ in evaluating both groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, no interactions were revealed (p < 0.05) between the method of planning the teaching programme and the experts who evaluated the acquisition level of the taught elements. The only significant difference between the experimental group and the control group was observed in the method of planning the teaching programme, according to which self-defence elements were taught (p < 0.01). Conclusions. The acquisition level of the taught self-defence elements according to the algorithm developed by basing it on the network model turned out to be significantly higher than in the case of those elements taught in the traditional (intuitive) planning process.
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
48-53
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 3 - 2012
online
3 - 4 - 2012
References
  • Arends R. J., Learning to Teach. McGraw Hill, New York 1994.
  • Perkins D. N., Salomon G., Transfer of learning. International Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford 1992.
  • Gallowey Ch.G., Psychology for learning and teaching. McGraw Hill Higher Education, New York 1976.
  • Inui N., Lateralization of bilateral transfer of visuomotor information in right-handers and left-handers. J Mot Behav, 2005, 37 (4), 275-283, doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.4.275-284.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Seidler R. D., Differential transfer processes in incremental visuomotor adaptation. Motor Control, 2005, 9 (1), 40-58.[PubMed]
  • Couzner B. N., The transfer of learning between tennis and table tennis skills. Australian Journal of Physical Education, 1974, 66, 5-8.
  • O'Keeffe S. L., Harrison A. J., Smyth P. J., Transfer or specificity? An applied investigation into the relationship between fundamental overarm throwing and related sport skills. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog, 2007, 12 (2), 89-102, doi: 10.1080/17408980701281995.[Crossref]
  • Weigelt C., Williams A. M., Wingrove T., Scott M. A., Transfer and motor skill learning in association football. Ergonomics, 2000, 43 (10), 1698-1707, doi: 10.1080/001401300750004104.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Kerzner H., Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken 2009.
  • Taffler R., Using Operational Research. A practical introduction to quantitative methods in management. Prentice Hall International, London 1979.
  • Antill J. M., Woodhead R. W., Critical path method in construction practice. 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York 1990.
  • Pilicz S., Measurement of overall physical fitness [in Polish]. Studia i Monografie AWF w Warszawie, 1997, 65.
  • Carnahan R. S., The effects of teacher planning on classroom process. Technical Report No. 541. Wisconsin R & D Center for Individualized Schooling, Madison 1980.
  • Schmidt R. A., Motor control and learning. Human Kinetics, Champaign 1988.
  • Marx R. W., Peterson P. L., The nature of teacher decision making. In: Joyce B. R., Brown C. C., Peck L. (eds.), Flexibility in teaching: An excursion into the nature of teaching and training. Longman, New York 1981, 236-255.
  • Jaczynowski L., Network models of motion teaching [in Polish]. SiT, Warszawa 1978.
  • Sterkowicz S., Spelak S., Optimisation of technical-tactical judo training plan of judokas aged 13-14. In: Sterkowicz S. (ed.), Professional activities of a coach and research problems in combat sports [in Polish]. Zeszyty Naukowe AWF w Krakowie, 2001, 83, 166-178.
  • Sterkowicz S., Madejski E., ABC Hapkido [in Polish]. KASPER, Kraków 1999.
  • Gužalovskij A. A., Experimental fundamentals of the methods of network planning in the process of teaching swimming [in Russian]. Teoriâ i Praktika Fizičeskoj Kultury, 1974, 1, 49-52.
  • Zybko P., Jaczynowski L., Application of network planning to teaching windsurfing. Phys Educ Sport, 2008, 52, 5-10, doi: 10.2478/v10030-008-0002-x.[Crossref]
  • Giuffrida C. G., Shea J. B., Fairbrother J. T., Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. J Mot Behav, 2002, 34 (4), 353-365, doi: 10.1080/00222890209601953.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • VanLehn K., Cognitive skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol, 1996, 47, 513-539, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.513.[Crossref]
  • Clark C. M., Yinger R., Teachers' thinking. In: Peterson P. L., Walberd H. J. (eds.), Research on teaching. McCutchan, Berkeley 1979, 231-263.
  • Hoffman S. J., Relevance, application, and the development of an unlikely theory. Quest, 1990, 42 (2), 143-160.
  • Dybińska E., Visual information communication in creation of mental programmes during teaching motor activities. Hum Mov, 2005, 6 (2), 85-92.
  • Duda H., Effects of programmed instructions on training efficiency in male and female football players. Phys Educ Sport, 2006, 50, 89-92.
  • Bebko J. M., Demark J. L., Im-Bolter N., MacKewn A., Transfer, control, and automatic processing in a complex motor task: an examination of bounce juggling. J Mot Behav, 2005, 37 (6), 465-474, doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.6.465-474.[Crossref]
  • Brady F., A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 1998, 50 (3), 266-293.[Crossref]
  • Moulton C.-A. E., Dubrowski A., MacRae H., Graham B., Grober E., Reznick R., Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? Ann Surg, 2006, 244 (3), 400-409, doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234808.85789.6a.[Crossref]
  • Meaney K. S., Griffin L. K., Hart M. A., The effect of model similarity on girls' motor performance. J Teach Phys Educ, 2005, 24, 165-178.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10038-012-0004-7
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.