Choosing the Right Body Position for Assessing Trunk Flexors and Extensors Torque Output

• Authors: Agnieszka Szpala , Alicja Rutkowska-Kucharska , Jarosław Drapała , Krzysztof Brzostowski
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose. The sitting position is generally adopted when measuring the torques produced by flexors and extensors of the trunk. Results of such measurements are influenced by the strength of both abdominal muscles and flexors of the hip joint. In order to assess the effect of exercises used to strengthen the abdominal muscles it was necessary to find such a measuring position which engaged mainly the abdominal muscles. The objective of the study was an assessment of EMG activity of abdominal and spinal muscles during the measurements of muscle torques in the sitting position, as well as in the lying position. Basic procedures. Thirteen female students of the University School of Physical Education in Wrocław participated in the study. The methods of measuring muscle torques and surface electromyography (sEMG) were used under static conditions. The torques were measured on a multifunctional chair in the lying and sitting positions. The surface EMG electrodes were placed on the right and left hand sides of m. rectus abdominis (RA) and m. erector spinae (ES). Signals from both muscles were sampled at 1000 Hz. Main findings. The maximal torques of trunk flexors in the sitting position and in the lying position were similar: 130.6 ± 31.7 Nm and 129.8 ± 37.9 Nm, respectively. By contrast, the torque of trunk extensors was significantly larger when the measurement was carried out in the sitting position (228.1 ± 76.4 Nm) as compared with the lying position (148.8 ± 25.3 Nm). The ratio of the maximal torques of flexors and extensors of the trunk in the women examined was 0.572 in the sitting position and 0.872 in the lying position. Both RA and ES showed higher EMG activity in the lying position than in the sitting position. Conclusions. The higher EMG activity of the RA muscle in the lying position at the same values of the trunk flexors torque in both positions may suggest that in the sitting position flexors of the hip joint are more engaged than abdominal muscles. That is why, in order to assess the effects of abdominal muscles training, measurements of the trunk flexors torque should be performed in the lying position.

Keywords

EN

torque; EMG; measuring position; trunk muscles

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Human Movement
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 57-64

Dates

published

1 - 3 - 2011

online

14 - 3 - 2011

Contributors

author

Agnieszka Szpala

• University School of Physical Education, Wrocław, Poland

author

Alicja Rutkowska-Kucharska

• University School of Physical Education, Wrocław, Poland

author

Jarosław Drapała

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

author

Krzysztof Brzostowski

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

References

• Buśko K., Nowak A., Changes of maximal muscle torque and maximal power output of lower extremities in male judoists during training. Hum Mov, 2008, 9 (2), 111-115. DOI: 10.2478/v10038-008-0013-8.[Crossref]
• Buśko K., Rychlik R., Changes of the maximal muscle torque in women training Power Yoga (Astanga Vinyasa). Hum Mov, 2006, 7 (2), 168-177.
• Mohamed O., Perry J., Hislop H., Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length, and torque of the hamstrings. Clin Biomech, 2002, 17 (8), 569-579. DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00070-0.[Crossref]
• Pietraszewski B., Pietraszewska J., Burdukiewicz A., Relationship between knee joint flexor and extensor torques and tissue components in young men. Hum Mov, 2009, 10 (1), 21-25. DOI: 10.2478/v10038-009-0004-4.[Crossref]
• Wychowański M., Wit A., Staniak Z., Ilnicka L., Trzaskoma Ł., Prototype stand for measurements of hip joint torques under static condition. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2000, 2 (Suppl. 1), 619-624.
• Zatsiorsky V. M., Biomechanics of strength and strength training. In: Komi P.V (ed.), Strength and power in sport. 2nd Ed., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2003, 439-487.
• Watanabe S., Eguchi A., Kobara K., Ishida H., Otsuki K., Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles during bicycle ergometer exercise and walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 2006, 46 (5), 311-315.[PubMed]
• Ng J. K., Richardson C. A., Parnianpour M., Kippers V., Fatigue-related changes in torque output and electromyographic parameters of trunk muscles during isometric axial rotation exertion: an investigation in patients with back pain and in healthy subjects. Spine, 2002, 27 (6), 637-646.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Rutkowska-Kucharska A., Szpala A., Pieciuk E., Symmetry of muscle activity during abdominal exercises. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2009, 1 (2), 25-30.
• Hermens H. J., Frerik B., Merletti R., European Recommendations for Surface Electromyography. Results of SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands, 1999.
• Dąbrowska A., Jaszczuk J., Wit A., Maximal values of muscle torques measured under static conditions. In: Wit A. (ed.), Biomechanical assessment of the athlete's system of movement. Instytut Sportu, Warszawa, 1992, 21-52 [in Polish].
• Clark K. M., Holt L., Sinyard J., Electromyographic comparison of the upper and lower rectus abdominis during abdominal exercises. J Strength Cond Res, 2003, 17 (3), 475-483.[PubMed]
• Lehman G. J., McGill S. M., The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1999, 22 (7), 444-446.[Crossref]
• De Luca C. J., The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech, 1997, 13 (2), 135-163.
• Ng J. K.-F., Kippers V., Richardson C. A., Muscle fibre orientation of abdominal muscles and suggested surface EMG electrode positions. Electomyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1998, 38, 51-58.
• Szpala A., Rutkowska-Kucharska A., Drapała J., Brzostowski K., Zawadzki J., Asymmetry of electromechanical delay (EMD) and torque in the muscles stabilizing spinal column. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2010, 12 (4), 11-18.[PubMed]
• Anders C. H., Wagner H., Puta C. H., Grassme R., Petrovitch A., Scholle H. C. H., Trunk muscle activation patterns during walking at different speeds. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2007, 17, 245-252.[WoS][Crossref]
• Stokes I. A., Relationships of EMG to effort in the trunk under isometric conditions: force-increasing and decreasing effects and temporal delays. Clin Biomech, 2005, 20 (1), 9-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.08.010.[Crossref]
• Gardner-Morse M., Stokes I. A. F., Laible J. P., Role of muscles in lumbar spine stability in maximum extension efforts. J Orthop Res, 1995, 13 (5), 802-808. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130521.[Crossref]
• Pollock C. L., Jenkyn T. R., Jones I. C., Ivanova T. D., Garland S. J., Electromyography and kinematics of the trunk during rowing in elite female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2009, 41 (3), 628-636.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Trzaskoma Z., Trzaskoma Ł., The proportion between maximal torque of core muscles in male and female athletes. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2001, 3 (Suppl. 2), 601-606 [in Polish].
• Dworak L. B., Wojtkowiak T., Kołaczkowski Z., Kmiecik K., Mączyński J., Relations between muscular force of the extensors and flexors of leg joints with the global extending force. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2001, 3 (Suppl. 2), 117-121 [in Polish].
• Drapała G., Trzaskoma Z., Maximal strength of trunk flexors and extensors in men and women with low back pain syndrome. Adv Rehab, 2006, 2, 24-30.
• Norris C. M., Functional load abdominal training: part 1. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 1999, 3 (3), 150-158. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-8592(99) 80020-5.[Crossref]
• Furjan-Mandić G., Milković R., Medved V., Oreb G., Comparison of abdominal muscles activation during different curl-up exercises in women. Proceedings Book, 3rd International Scientific Conference, 2002, Opatija, Croatia, 697-700.
• Axler C. T., McGill S. M., Low back loads over a variety of abdominal exercises: searching for the safest abdominal challenge. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1997, 29 (6), 804-811.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10038-011-0005-y