PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2011 | 83 | 10 | 537-540
Article title

Hybrid Procedures of Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Large Bowel Disorders

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The aim of the study was to describe the authors' experience in performing laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with the formation of an intestinal reservoir of the J-pouch type, anal anastomosis and protective ileostomy.Material and methods. Between 2004 and 2011, a total of 23 patients underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with the formation of an intestinal reservoir of the J-pouch type, anal anastomosis and protective ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (n = 17) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6). A statistical analysis of the treatment outcomes was performed.Results. No intraoperative complications were observed and none of the patients required conversion or blood transfusions. The mean duration of the procedure was 4.08 hours (2.5-6.0 hours). The mean duration of hospitalization was 15.4 days (8-24 days). We observed three major postoperative complications requiring intervention: two cases of small bowel obstruction (one due to postoperative adhesions and the other due to volvulus) and one case of infection of the surgical and ostomy wound healed following ileostomy closure.Conclusions. For such extensive procedures as restorative proctocolectomy, laparoscopic techniques prove safe and are characterised by a better patient acceptance thanks to the low invasiveness and good cosmetic effects. The technological progress and the increasing experience in performing laparoscopy provide more and more arguments to support the selection of this method as the preferred method of treatment.
Publisher
Year
Volume
83
Issue
10
Pages
537-540
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 10 - 2011
online
21 - 12 - 2011
References
  • Parks AG, Nicholls RJ: Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978; 2: 85-88.[Crossref]
  • Peters WR: Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with creation of ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992 Jun; 2(3): 175-78.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ: Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. A prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1992 Jul; 35(7): 651-55.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Thibault C, Poulin EC: Total laparoscopic proctocolectomy and laparoscopy-assisted proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: operative technique and preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995 Dec; 5(6): 472-76.[PubMed]
  • Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A et al.: Telerobotic-assisted-laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1689-94; discussion 95-96.[Crossref]
  • Pedraza R, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al.: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011 Jul; 20(4): 234-39. Epub 2011 Mar 21.[WoS]
  • Tilney HS, Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG et al.: Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches to ileal pouch surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007 May; 22(5): 531-42. Epub 2006 Aug 10.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Ahmed AU, Keus F, Heikens JT et al.: Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo anal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitits and familial adenomatous polyposis (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009.[WoS]
  • McAllister I, Sagar PM, Brayshaw I et al.: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with and without previous subtotal colectomy. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 296-301.[Crossref][WoS][PubMed]
  • Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK et al.: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Col Rectum 2000; 43: 604-08.[Crossref]
  • Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al.: Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anasotomosis. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 984-92.[Crossref]
  • El-Gazzaz GS, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al.: Outcomes for casematched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 522-26.[WoS]
  • Indar AA, Efron JE, Young-Fadok TM: Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 174-77.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JFM et al.: Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1301-07.[PubMed][Crossref][WoS]
  • Fichera A, Silvestri MT, Hurst RD et al.: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a comparative observational study on long-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 2009 Mar; 13(3): 526-32. Epub 2008 Nov 18.[WoS][Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-011-0085-6
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.