PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2009 | 81 | 3 | 123-128
Article title

Postoperative Hydrocele after Varicelectomy in Adolescents and its Prophylaxis

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Postoperative hydrocele (PH) is the most common and important complication of surgical treatment of varicocele. It may form many years after procedure performed in adolescent boys. Among procedure modifications aiming at prevention of PH the authors describe formation of a ‘window’ in tunica vaginalis and lymphatic vessels sparing.The aim of the study was determination of true PH occurrence in long term results and evaluation of implemented modifications of surgical treatment aimed at decreasing the occurrence of this complication.Material and methods. The analysis comprised 289 boys operated using the Palomo method between 1991-2007. Initially no modification aiming at PH prevention was used, between 2003-2005 a ‘window’ was created in tunica vaginalis and since 2005 the standard has become dyeing of the lymphatic vessels which enabled sparing of these vessels during surgery. We evaluated the frequency of PH formation basing on direct postoperative and long term results in our operated patients.Results. Out-patient records of 289 boys who had undergone primary varicelectomy between 1999-2007 were retrospectively reviewed. In the group of 237 patients operated using the standard method PH was diagnosed in 26 cases (10.98%). The results were not improved by introduction of a modification - creation of a ‘window’ in tunica vaginalis. Hydrocele formed in 4 out of 27 patients (14.82%). In 25 boys treated with modified method - lymphatic vessels dyeing and sparing - in early postoperative period there were no cases of PH. The analysis of 122 adult men treated in childhood, who had been followed for on average 8 years and 8 months after surgery, showed that the frequency of PH after standard Palomo procedure without any preventive modifications was 27.9% (34 out of 122 operated cases).Conclusions. 1. Postoperative hydrocele is the most common complication of surgical treatment of varicocele, however comparison of results from different centres requires uniform diagnostic criteria. 2. Early evaluation of this complication after procedures without preventive modifications may not be reliable, as PH may form many years after operation (11% based on records from early postoperative period, 27.8% based on long term results). 3. Among the modifications aimed at prevention of PH formation lymphatic vessels sparing seems most effective (in 25 patients operated using this method no PH in early postoperative period was seen), however long term results must be taken into account.
Publisher
Year
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
123-128
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 3 - 2009
online
8 - 9 - 2009
References
  • World Health Organization: The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril 1992, 57: 1289-93.
  • Kass EJ, Belman AB: Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol 1987; 137: 475-76.
  • Niedzielski J, Paduch D, Raczyński P: Assessment of adolescent varicocele. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12 (5-6): 410.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Paduch DA, Niedzielski J: Semen analysis in young men with varicocele: preliminary study. J Urol 1996; 156: 788-90.
  • Paduch DA, Skoog SJ: Current Management of Adolescent Varicocele. Rev Urol 2001; 3 (3): 120-33.[PubMed]
  • Dubin L, Amelar RD: Surgical therapy for male infertility. J Reprod Med 1977; 18 (4): 211-17.[PubMed]
  • Kass EJ, Marcol B: Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques. J Urol 1992; 148: 694-96.
  • Mazzoni G, Fiocca G, Minucci S et al.: Varicocele: a multidisciplinary approach in children and adolescents. J Urol 1999; 162: 1757-58.
  • Misseri R, Gershbein AB, Horowitz M et al.: The adolescent varicocele. II: the incidence of hydrocele and delayed recurrent varicocele after varicocelectomy in a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2001; 87: 494-98.
  • Ross LS, Ruppman N: Varicocele vein ligation in 565 patients under local anesthesia: a long-term review of technique, results and complications in light of proposed management by laparoscopy. J Urol 1993; 149: 1361-63
  • Stern R, Kistler W, Scharli AF: The Palomo procedure in the treatment of boys with varicocele: a retrospective study of testicular growth and fertility. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 14: 74-78.
  • Szabo R, Kessler R: Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation: retrospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1984; 132: 924-25.
  • Paduch DA, Niedzielski J: Repair versus observation in adolescent varicocele: a prospective study. J Urol 1997; 158: 1128-32.
  • Leung ML, Gooding GA, Williams RD: Highresolution sonography of scrotal contents in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143: 161-64.
  • Pajk A, Jakubowski W: Diagnostyka ultrasonograficzna narządów moszny. Wyd. I. Makmed, Gdańsk 2002.
  • Tsikopoulos GK, Roussis XS, Georgakis J et al.: Does incision of the tunica vaginalis during the Palomo procedure prevent post-operative hydrocele? BJU Int 1998; 81(4): 612-13.
  • Oswald J, Korner I, Riccabona M: The use of isosulphan blue to identify lymphatic vessels in high retroperitoneal ligation of adolescent varicocele - avoiding postoperative hydrocele. BJU Int 2001; 87 (6): 502-04.
  • Kocvara R, Dvoracek J, Sedlacek J i wsp.: Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a microsurgical repair. J Urol 2005; 173 (5): 1751-54.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-009-0017-x
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.