PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 80 | 8 | 413-416
Article title

Laparoscopic Live-Donor Nephrectomy With Retroperitoneoscopic Access

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Live donation remains the single most consistent factor affecting long-term results of the transplantation. Open live donor nephrectomy is associated with high traumatization and possibility of complications due to large skin incision. The alternative is laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) which is widely used in many countries. We present the case of LDN. The retroperitoneal approach was applied and time of operation was 210 min. The immediate function of transplanted kidney was observed. Authors hope that the offering this minimally invasive procedure to the potential donors may popularize the idea of live donation in Poland.
Publisher

Year
Volume
80
Issue
8
Pages
413-416
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 8 - 2008
online
10 - 9 - 2008
Contributors
  • Department of Urology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin
  • Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, WSzZ, Szczecin
  • Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, WSzZ, Szczecin
  • Department of Urology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin
References
  • Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV: Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003; 3; 1295-1301.[PubMed]
  • Kim FJ, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR: Renal transplantation: laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 777-85.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Velosa JA, Griffin MD, Larson TS et al.: Can a transplanted living donor kidney function equivalently to it native partner? Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 252-59.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Merril JP, Murray JE, Arrison JH: Successful homotransplantations of human kidney between identical twins. JAMA. 1956; 160: 277-82.
  • Brown SL, Biehl TR, Rawlins MC et al.: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach. J Urol 2001;165: 766-69.
  • Khauli RB: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the future. Trans Proc 2003; 35: 41-42.
  • Słojewski M, Petrasz P, Gołąb A et al.: Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy - technique and results based on 80 cases. Eur Urol Meet 2007; 4: 19.
  • Słojewski M, Gołąb A, Lemiński A i wsp.: Chirurgia laparoskopowa górnych dróg moczowych z dostępu pozaotrzewnowego z użyciem trzech trokarów jako etap na drodze zmniejszenia inwazyjności techniki retroperitoneoskopii. Urol Pol 2004; 57: 33-37.
  • Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al.: Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991; 146: 278-82.
  • Ljungberg B, Hanbury BC, Kuczyk MA et al.: Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma. European Association of Urology, 2008.
  • Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG et al.: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047-49.[PubMed]
  • Tanabe K, Miyamoto N, Ishida H et al.: Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 739-45.[Crossref]
  • Wadström J: Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: reduced perioperative risk and excellent outcome - experience from the first 110 consecutive cases. Transplantationsmedizin 2006; 18: 15-20.
  • Nazarewski S, Gałązka Z, Grochowiecki T i wsp.: Wideoskopowe pobranie nerki od żywego dawcy. Pol Przegl Chir 2004; 76: 305-14.
  • Czerwiński J, Antoszkiewicz K, Malanowski P et al.: Organ donation in Poland 2006. Ann Transplant 2007; 12: 5-10.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-008-0058-6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.