PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 80 | 7 | 343-350
Article title

Gastric Emptying in Esophageal Substitutes

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
For patients undergoing esophagectomy, the stomach is the organ that is most commonly used to restore continuity in the gastrointestinal tract. As a consequence of changes in stomach shape and location, patients in the postoperative period usually experience disturbed motility of the upper gastrointestinal tract of variable intensity.The aim of the study was to assess the motility of esophageal substitutes and the emptying rate of a narrowed stomach (in particular its prepyloric portion) using scintigraphy in patients undergoing esophageal resection compared to those in healthy controls.Material and methods. Between 2000 and 2006, 297 patients (105 women, 192 men) underwent surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in the Clinic of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Ten patients (average age 59; range 54 to 67 years) who underwent an attempted curative esophageal resection were selected into the study group. Patients from this group underwent scintigraphic assessment of gastric emptying between three to 11 months after the surgical procedure (an average 7 months). Furthermore, ten healthy volunteers (average age 28; range 19 to 43 years) constituted the control group.Results. The average radiotracer retention after two hours was 44.7±6.5% in the study group and 51.1±7.4% (p>0.2) in the control group. Frequency of contractions of the whole prepyloric segment, as well as its distal fragment, in the subsequent periods of examination was comparable in both groups. Correlation among the frequency of contractions, contraction duration and duration of relaxation of the whole prepyloric segment and its distal fragment was high for the control group (correlation coefficients 0.71 p<0.001; 0.71 p=0; and 0.63 p=0, respectively). In the study group, correlation between the frequency of contractions and contraction duration was poor (coefficients of correlation 0.03 p>0.8 and -0.02 p>0.9), while correlation between duration of relaxation of the whole prepyloric segment and its distal fragment was moderate (coefficient of correlation 0.34 p>0.06).Conclusions. Formation of a gastric substitute after its narrowing and denervation (truncal vagotomy) does not abolish gastric contractility. Frequency, amplitude, duration of contraction, and relaxation duration of the prepyloric portion of the ectopic substitute do not differ significantly from the patterns of motility of the upper gastrointestinal tract in healthy volunteers.
Publisher
Year
Volume
80
Issue
7
Pages
343-350
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 7 - 2008
online
23 - 7 - 2008
References
  • Parkin DM, Bray F et al.:. Global Cancer Statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005: 55; 74-108.
  • Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M et al.:. Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 845-57.
  • Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A et al.:. Cancer statistics 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 5-26.
  • Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Zeng W et al.:. Impact of Hospital Volume on Long-term Survival After Esophageal Cancer Surgery. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 113-17.[WoS]
  • Maier A, Tomaselli F, Sankin O et al.:. Acid-related diseases following retrosternal stomach inter-position. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48(39): 899-902.
  • O'Riordan, Tucker ON, Byrne PJ et al.:. Factors influencing the development of Barrett's epithelium in the esophageal remnant postesophagectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(2): 205-11.[Crossref]
  • Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M et al.:. Use of the stomach as a esophageal substitute. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 606-10.
  • El Nakadi I, Houben J, Gay F et al.:. Does oesophagectomy cure a respectable oesophageal cancer? World J Surg 1993; 17: 760-65.
  • Bartels H, Thorban S, Siewert JR:. Anterior versus posterior reconstruction after transhiatal oesophagectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1141-44.
  • Siewert JR, Bartels H, Lange J et al.:. E bloc Oesophagectomie - wann soll die Speiserohre rekontruiert werden? Langenbecks Arch Chir 1991; 375: 166-70.
  • Johansson J, Sloth M, Bajc M et al.:. Radioisotope evaluation of the esophageal remnant and the gastric conduit after gastric pull -up esophagectomy. Surgery 1999; 125: 297-303.
  • Morton KA, Karwande SV, Davis RK et al.:. Gastric emptying after gastric interposition for cancer of the esophagus or hypopharynx. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52(5): 1207-08.
  • Gutschow CA, Collard JM, Romagnoli R et al.:. Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71(6): 1786-91.[Crossref]
  • Graff J, Brinch K and Madsen JL et al. Simplified scintigraphic methods for measuring gastrointestinal transit times. 2000 Blackwell Science Ltd. Clinical Physiology 20; 4: 262-66.
  • Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM et al.:. Intrathoracic gastric emptying of solid food after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80(2): 443-47.[Crossref]
  • de Boer Agem, Onorbe Genovesi PI, Sprangers MAG et al.:. Quality of life in long-term survivors after curative transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1716-21.
  • McLarty AJ, Deschamps C, Trastek VF et al.:. Esophageal resection for cancer of the oesophagus: long-term function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1568-72.
  • Logeman F, Borm JJJ, van Lanschot JJB et al.:. Disturbed Enterogastric Inhibitory Reflex after Esophageal Resection and Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 186-91.
  • Calabuig R, Carrio I, Mones J et al.:. Gastric emptying after truncal vagotomy pyloroplasty. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 659-64.
  • Logeman F, Roelofs JMM, Obertop H et al.:. Tonic Motor Activity of the Narrow Gastric tube used as an Oesophageal Substitute. Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 301-06.
  • Casson AG, Powe J, Inculet R et al.:. Functional results of gastric interposition following total esophagectomy. Clin Nucl Med 1991; 16: 918-22.
  • Bemelman WA, Taat CW, Slors JFM et al.:. Delayed postoperative emptying after oesophageal resection is dependent on the size of the gastric substitute. Am J Coll Surg 1995; 180: 461-64.
  • Mearin F, Cucala M, Azpiroz F et al.:. The origin of symptoms on the brain-gut axis in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterolgy 1991; 101: 999-1006.
  • Del Poli M, Mioli P, Gasparri G et al.:. Functional study of intestinal transplants after esophagectomy. Minerva Chir 1991; 46(suppl): 241-45.
  • Pandolfo N, Spigno L, Guiddo G et al.:. Functional evaluation of gastric and jejunal transplants after esophagectomy. Minerva Chif 1991; 46(suppl): 253-62.
  • Calabuig R, Carrio I, Mones J et al.:. Gastric emptying after truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 659-64.
  • Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Otte JB et al.:. The denervated stomach as an oesophageal substitute is a contractile organ. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 33-39.
  • Walsh TN, Caldwell MT, Fallon C et al.:. Gastric motility following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 91-94.
  • Banki F, Mason RJ, DeMeester SR et al.:. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: A more phisiologic alternative. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 324-35.
  • Gawad KA, Hosch AB, Bumann B et al.:. How important is the route of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gast 1999; 94: 1491-45.
  • Katsoulis IE, Robotis I, Kouraklis G et al.:. Duodenogastric reflux after oesophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction. World J Surg 2005; 29: 174-81.
  • van Lanschot JJB, van Blankestein M, Oeis HY et al.:. Randomised comparison of prevertebral et retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after resection of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 102-08.
  • Bonavina L, Anselmino M, Ruol A et al.:. Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an oesophageal substitute. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 529-32.
  • Skinner DB:. Esophageal reconstruction. Am J Surg 1980; 139: 810-14.
  • Eeftinck Schattenekerk M, Obertop H, Mud HJ et al.:. Survival after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 165-68.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-008-0046-x
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.