PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 80 | 5 | 256-262
Article title

The Role of Ultrasound, Computed Tomography and FNAB in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mass Lesions - Defining the Indications for FNAB Application

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Adenocarcinoma is the most frequent pathology diagnosed in patients with pancreatic mass lesions, and it must be differentiated into benign and inflammatory tumors.The aim of the study was to define the efficacy of ultrasound, computed tomography (US/CT) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the assessment of pancreatic mass lesions.Material and methods. The study population comprised 150 consecutive patients with heterogeneous pancreatic mass lesions treated at our department between 1999 and 2004. Imaging examinations with US/CT and FNAB were carried out in all the patients. The final nature of the tumor was established based on histopathology in patients who underwent surgery or based on the follow-up course in patients who were not referred to surgical exploration. The sensitivity and specificity of US/CT and FNAB were calculated by comparing the clinical diagnosis resulting from US/CT interpretation and FNAB results obtained before treatment with the final diagnosis.Results. FNAB appeared to be a safe and relatively simple procedure with no remarkable complications. Malignant tumors were finally diagnosed in 99 (66%), and benign were finally diagnosed tumors in 51 (34%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 90% and 77.3% for US/CT and 86.9% and 100% for FNAB, respectively.Conclusions. The imaging examination with US/CT is a relatively reliable method for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions. A positive FNAB has still remained the most accurate diagnostic method.
Publisher

Year
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
256-262
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 5 - 2008
online
9 - 6 - 2008
Contributors
  • 2 Chair and Department of General, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Medical University, Lublin, Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 2 Chair and Department of General, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Medical University, Lublin, Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 2 Chair and Department of General, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Medical University, Lublin, Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 2 Chair and Department of General, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Medical University, Lublin, Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 2 Chair and Department of General, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Medical University, Lublin, Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
References
  • DelMaschio A, Vanzulli A, Sironi S et al.: Pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis: Diagnosis with CA 19-9 assessment, US, CT, and CT-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy. Radiology 1991; 178: 95-99.
  • Rosewicz S, Wiedenmann B: Pancreatic carcinoma. Lancet 1997; 349: 485-89.
  • Warshaw AL: Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1991; 159: 26-30.
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma - Clinical practice guidelines in oncology 2004.
  • Pulay I, Tihanyi TF, Flautner L: Pancreatis head mass: what can be done? Classification: the clinical point of view. JOP 2000; 1: 85-90.
  • Furukawa H: Diagnostic clues for early pancreatic cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2002; 32: 391-92.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Manabe T, Miyashita T, Ohshio G: Small carcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer 1988; 62: 135-41.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Tillou A, Schwartz MR, Jordan PH: Percutaneous needle biopsy of the pancreas: When should it be performed? World J Surg 1996; 20: 283-87.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Kulig J, Nowak W, Gryglewski A: Doświadczenia własne w ocenie wartości klinicznej aspiracyjnej biopsji cienkoigłowej (BAC) pod kontrolą ultrasonografii w rozpoznawaniu guzów jamy brzusznej. Pol Przegl Chir 2000; 2: 130-38.
  • Tomazic A, Pegan V: Preoperative staging of periampullar cancer with US, CT, EUS and CA 19-9. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2000; 47: 1135-37.
  • Niederau C, Grendell JH: Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Imaging techniques and tumor markers. Pancreas 1992; 7: 66-86.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Chi-Hsiao Y, Han-Ming Ch, Yi-Yin J et al.: Clinical analysis of inflammatory masses of the pancreatic head region. Hepato-Gastroenterology 1998; 45: 2392-98.
  • Pisters PW, Lee JE, Vauthey JN et al.: Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 325-37.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Tomiyama T, Ueno N, Tano S et al.: Assessment of arterial invasion in pancreatic cancer using color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1410-16.[PubMed]
  • Ueno N, Tomiyama T, Tano S et al.: Color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal vein invasion in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 825-30.[PubMed]
  • Brandt KR, Charboneau JW, Stephens DH et al.: CT- and US- guided biopsy of the pancreas. Radiology 1993; 187: 99-104.
  • Benson MD, Gandhi MR: Ultrasound of the hepatobiliary-pancreatic system. World J Surg 2000; 24: 166-70.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Karlson BM, Forsman CA, Wilander E et al.: Efficiency of percutaneous core biopsy in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Surgery 1996; 120: 75-79.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Karlson BM, Ekbom A, Lindgren PG et al.: Abdominal US for diagnosis of pancreatic tumor: prospective cohort analysis. Radiology 1999; 213: 107-11.
  • Horwhat JD, Gress F: Defining the Diagnostic Algorithm in Pancreatic Cancer. JOP. J Pancreas 2004; 5: 289-303.
  • Sheehan M, Latona C, Aranha G et al.: The incrising problem of unusual pancreatic tumors. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 644-50.
  • Gierbliński I: Biopsja aspiracyjna cienkoigłowa w diagnostyce zmian ogniskowych w narządach jamy brzusznej. Ultrasonografia 1998; 1: 5-15.
  • Carson HJ, Green LK, Castelli M et al.: Utilization of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the diagnosis of metastatic tumors to the pancreas. Diagnost Cytopathol 1995; 12: 8-13.[Crossref]
  • O'Connell MJ, Paulson EK, Jaffe TA et al.: Percutaneous biopsy of periarterial soft tissue cuffs in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 115-19.[Crossref]
  • Robins DB, Katz RL, Evans DB et al.: Fine Needle Aspiration of pancreas in quest of accuracy. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 1-10.[PubMed][WoS]
  • Marchevsky AM, Nelson V, Martin SE et al.: Telecytology of FNAB of the pancreas. Diagnostic Cytopathology 2003; 28: 147-52.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Ihse I, Axelson J, Dawiskiba S et al.: Pancreatic biopsy: Why? When? How? World J Surg 1999; 23: 896-00.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Lerma E, Musulen E, Cuatrecasas M et al.: Fine needle aspiration cytology in pancreatic pathology. Acta Cytologica 1996; 4: 683-86.[Crossref]
  • Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Jowell PS et al.: Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61: 854-61.[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-008-0033-2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.