PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2008 | 80 | 2 | 62-68
Article title

Factors Influencing Frequency of Conversion During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The aim of the study was to evaluate factors influencing the frequency of conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; to observe dynamic trends concerning frequency of classic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomies; and to evaluate correlations between the experience of a surgeon and conversion incidence.Material and methods. A retrospective study was performed, reviewing the records of 3337 patients operated on for gallbladder stones from January 2000 to December 2005 in three hospitals in the Pomeranian Region of Poland: Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk; Department of Surgery, 110th Military Hospital in Elbląg and Department of Surgery, Hospital in Słupsk.The main issues evaluated were: dynamic changes in frequency of laparoscopic versus classic cholecystectomies; frequency of conversions, reasons for conversion; correlation between experience of a surgeon and conversion incidence; and demographic data.Results. Out of 3337 patients, there were 2390 (71.62%) females and 947 (28.3%) males. For these patients, 1493 procedures (45.2%) were performed as classical, 1804 (54.06%) as laparoscopic, and 176 (9.7%) as converted from laparoscopy to open procedure. Sex distribution in the laparoscopic group was 1352:452 (F:M 74.9%:25.05%) and in the converted group was 107:69 (60.8%:39.2%).The main problems relating to conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were: adhesions - 108 (61.36%), gall-bladder perforations - 8 (4.5%), tumors - 10 (5.6%), technical problems - 28 (15.9%), hemostasis problems - 11 (6.25%), unrecognizable anatomical structures - 24 (13.6%), complications of ‘e fundo’ cholecystectomy - 24 (13.6%) and equipment problems - 4 (2.27%).It was also observed that SHO's and surgeons with greater experience are performing more conversions during laparoscopic procedures.Conclusions. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure recommended as a gold standard for gallbladder stone treatment. Frequency of this procedure is rising in centers in the Pomeranian region.The highest incidence of conversions is associated with adhesions after previous open operations.Consultants perform earlier conversion due to greater experience and better estimation of risk factors.
Publisher
Year
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
62-68
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 2 - 2008
online
7 - 4 - 2008
References
  • Mühe E: Cholecystectomie durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir 1986; 369: 804.
  • Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R et al.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 373-80.
  • Livingston EH, Rege RV: A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 205-11.
  • Williams LF Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA et al.: Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 459-65.
  • Kane RL, Lurie N, Borbas C et al.: The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180: 136-45.
  • Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL et al.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new "gold standard"? Arch Surg 1992; 127:917-921 (discussion 921-923).
  • Tang B, Cuschieri A: Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10(7): 1081-91.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Szmidt J, Gruca Z, Krawczyk M et al.: Podstawy chirurgii. Wyd 1 Medycyna Praktyczna; Kraków 2004.
  • Del Rio P, Del'Abate P, Soliani P et al.: Videolaparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Analyzing Conversion Risk Factors Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. J Lap Adv Surg Tech 2006; Vol. 16, No. 2.
  • Kaska L: Ocena videoskopowej adrenalektomii jako metody chirurgicznego leczenia guzów nadnerczy. AM Gdańsk 2003.
  • ---
  • Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A et al.: Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 90509.
  • Kama NA, Dognay M, Dolapci M et al.: Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 965-68.
  • Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E et al.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 755-60.
  • Tayeb M, Raza A, Khan R et al.: Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: Multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51(1).[PubMed]
  • Delivering quality and value. Focus on cholecystectomy. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, London 2005.
  • Fletcher DR, Hobbs M, Tan P et al.: Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: A population - based study. This month's feature. Ann Surg 1999; 229(4): 449-57.
  • New South Wales Healthcare Annual Reports. New South Wales Healthcare Service, Sydney 2006.
  • Petakovic G, Korica M, Gavrilovic S: Acute cholecystitis early or delayed cholecystectomy. Med Pregl 2002; 55: 135-39.
  • Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J et al.: Management of acute cholecystits in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J 2004; 80: 292-94.
  • Ayerdi J, Wiseman J, Gupta S et al.: Training background as a factor in the conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystecomy. Am Surgeon 2001; 61(8): 780-85.
  • Dobosz M: Wspomagana komputerowo statystyczna analiza wyników badań. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT; 2001.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-008-0003-8
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.