PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2007 | 79 | 5 | 362-367
Article title

Ileal-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis After Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis - 11 Years of Experience

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Restorative proctocolectomy is the "gold standard" in surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The two alternative techniques of ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis include handmade and double line stapled suture.The aim of the study was to analyze postoperative complications and functional results of the two types of anastomosis.Material and methods. The study group consisted of 108 patients operated between 1994 and 2005 for ulcerative colitis (n=97) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n=11). Stapled anastomosis was performed in 88 (81.5%) cases and hand-made suture was performed in 20 (18.5%) cases.Results. No significant differences between the two anastomotic techniques were found in terms of postoperative complications and late functional results.Conclusions. The low rate of complications and well-accepted functional outcomes prove that restorative proctocolectomy is a safe surgical procedure that can be offered to patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Double line stapled suture should be the preferred method of ilealpouch-anal anastomosis, however, the hand-made suture remains its valuable alternative and may be considered in selected cases.
Publisher

Year
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
362-367
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 5 - 2007
online
17 - 10 - 2007
Contributors
  • Department of General, Gastroenterological and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University, Wrocław
  • Department of General, Gastroenterological and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University, Wrocław
author
  • Department of General, Gastroenterological and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University, Wrocław
References
  • Michelassi F, Hurst R: Restorative proctocolectomy with J-pouch-ileo-anal anastomosis. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 347-53.
  • Roberts PL: Surgical options for ulcerative colitis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 2000; 89: 257-61.[PubMed]
  • Drews M, Krokowicz P, Meissner W: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch in surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Zentrabl Chir 1998; 123(suppl): 45-52.
  • Yu Sch, Pemberton JH, Larson D: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1487-96.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM et al.: Ileal pouchanal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 120-27.
  • Kuśnierz KA, Musiewicz M: Wrzodziejące zapalenie jelita grubego - kiedy i jak leczymy chirurgicznie? Pol Przegl Chir 2003; 75: 615-22.
  • Nicholls RJ: Ulcerative colitis - surgical indications and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16(Suppl 4): 25-28.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Mortier PE, Gambiez L, Karoui M et al.: Colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis preserves female fertility in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006; 30: 594-97.[Crossref]
  • Hancock L, Windsor AC, Mortensen NJ: Inflammatory bowel disease: the view of the surgeon. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8(Suppl 1): 10-14.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Herman J, Wierzbicki T, Krokowicz P i wsp.: Odległe powikłania proktokolektomii odtwórczej u chorych operowanych z powodu wrzodziejącego zapalenia jelita grubego (Late complications of restorative proctocolectomy in patients operated on for ulcerative colitis.) Pol Przegl Chir 2000; 72: 718, 729.
  • Garbus JE, Potenti F., Wexner SD: Current controversies in pouch surgery. South Med J 2003; 96: 32-36.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Herman J, Wierzbicki T, Krokowicz P i wsp.: Porównanie dwóch technik wykonania proktokolektomii odtwórczej u chorych leczonych z powodu wrzodziejącego zapalenia jelita grubego (Comparison of two techniques of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis). Pol Przegl Chir 2000; 72: 708-17.
  • Bednarz W, Dawiskiba J, Wojczys R et al.: Pouch-anal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy in patients operated for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2002; 49(Suppl II): p. LIX.[WoS]
  • Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowicz K et al.: Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1845-50.[Crossref]
  • McNevin MS, Bax T, MacFarlane M et al.: Outcomes of a laparoscopic approach for total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 673-76
  • Saigusa N, Kurahashi T, Makamura T et al.: Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Today 2000; 30: 575-81.[Crossref]
  • Gosselink MP, West RL, Kuipers EJ et al.: Integrity of the anal sphincters after pouch-anal anastomosis: evaluation with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1728-35.[Crossref]
  • Seow-Choen AT, Tsunoda A, Nicholls RJ: Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 430.
  • Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Orrom WJ et al.: Improvement of anal sensation with preservation of the anal transitional zone after ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 414.[Crossref]
  • Fazio VW: 1911 IPAA. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 43-48.
  • Hueting WE, Buskens E, van deer Tweel I et al.: Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meataanalysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9317 patients. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 69-79.[Crossref]
  • Sagar PM, Taylor BA: Pelvic ileal reservoirs: the options. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 325-28.
  • Mc Intyre P, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG: Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 303-07.
  • Schimmelpenning H, Bruch HP: J-pouch. Selection of patients and how to avoid malfunctions. Zentrabl Chir 2001; 126(Suppl 1): 32-35.[Crossref]
  • Krausz MM, Duek SD: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: twenty years follow-up in 174 patients. Isr Med Assoc J 2005; 7: 23-27.
  • Fazio VW: What is the better technique in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? Stapled anastomosis. Infl Bow Dis 1996; 2: 148-50.
  • Becker JM: What is the better technique in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ? Mucosectomy. Infl Bow Dis 1996; 2: 151-54.
  • Launer DP, Sachier JM: Pouch anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 993-98.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Senapati A, Tibbs CJ, Ritchie JK: Stenosis of the pouch anal anastomosis following restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Col Dis 1996; 11: 57-60.[Crossref]
  • Tsunoda A, Talbot JC, Nicholls RJ: Incidence of dysplasia in the anorectum mucosa in patients having restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 506-08.
  • Stern H, Walfisch S, Mullen B et al.: Cancer in an ileoanal reservoir: a new late complication. Gut 1990; 31: 473-75.[Crossref]
  • Malassagne B, Penna C, Parc R: adenomatous polyps in the anal transitional zone after ileal-pouch anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: treatment by transitional mucosectomy and ileal pouch advancement. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1634.
  • Knupper N, Straub E, Terpe HJ et al.: Adenocarcinoma of the ileoanal pouch for ulcerative colitis - a complication of severe atrophic pouchitis? Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 478-82.[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-007-0056-0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.