PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2007 | 79 | 2 | 78-84
Article title

Tumor Size and Pathologic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Analysis of 639 Early Breast Cancers

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Primary tumor size, an essential clinical parameter, is assessed by oncologist during the physical examination of a patient with breast cancer. The results of such assessment constitutes a basis for classification of breast cancer staging, selection of proper primary treatment, selection of type of surgical treatment and initial evaluation of patient prognosis.The aim of the study was to describe changes in biological characteristics of breast cancers relative to increases in primary tumor size.Material and methods. All women treated surgically for breast cancer in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University in Łódź, from 1999 to 2004, were included in our study. We confined our analysis to primary operable, invasive, primary tumors less than 3 cm. 639 cases comprised the study group. We analyzed the associations between primary tumor size and other routinely assessed clinical and pathological parameters.Results. We found statistical associations between primary tumor size and the presence of metastases in axillary lymph nodes (p<0.0001), presence of extracapsular extension of lymph nodes metastases (p<0.0001), presence of tumor cells emboli (p<0.0001), absence of expression of estrogen receptor (p=0043) and absence of progesterone receptor (p=0.0196) in cancer cells. No association was found between tumor size and histologic tumor type (p=0.205). In a subgroup of ductal carcinomas, tumor size was associated with the grade of cancer (p=0.0002).Conclusions. Increases in tumor size are accompanied by increasing incidence of unfavorable prognostic factors and decreasing incidence of favorable prognostic factors. Tumor size constitutes the source of direct and indirect prognostic information.
Publisher

Year
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
78-84
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 2 - 2007
online
24 - 9 - 2007
Contributors
author
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
author
  • Department of Pathology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
  • Institute of Psychology, University, Łódź
author
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
author
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
author
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University, Łódź
References
  • Jassem J, Krzakowski M, Olszewski W i wsp.: Rak piersi. Zalecenia diagnostyczno-terapeutyczne Polskiej Unii Onkologii. Nowotwory - Journal of Oncology 2003; 53: 300-24.
  • Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P et al.: Revision of the American Committee on Cancer Staging System for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3628-36.[Crossref]
  • Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D et al.: Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 966-78.
  • Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al.: Meeting highlights: International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 1569-83.[Crossref]
  • Stierer M, Rosen H, Weber R et al.: A prospective analysis of immunohistochemically determined hormone receptors and nuclear features as predictors of early recurrence in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995; 36: 11-21.[Crossref]
  • Cianfrocca M, Goldstein LJ: Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer. The Oncologist 2004; 9: 606-16.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Aziz SA, Pervez S, Khan S et al.: Significance of immunohistochemical c-erbB-2 product localization pattern for prognosis in human breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2001; 7: 190-96.[Crossref]
  • Bandyopadhyay D, Redkar A, Bharde S et al.: Prognostic association of c-erbB-2 oncogene amplification and protein overexpression in human breast cancer using archival tissues. Acta Oncologica 1994; 33: 493-98.[Crossref]
  • Bánkfalvi A, Tory K, Temper M et al.: Clinical relevance of immunohistochemical expression of p53-targeted gene products mdm-2, p21 and bcl-2 in breast carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 2000; 196: 489-501.[Crossref]
  • Riou G, Mathieu MC, Barrois M et al.: c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) gene amplification is a better indicator of poor prognosis than protein over-expression in operable breast-cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2001; 95: 266-70.[Crossref]
  • Sirvent JJ, Fortuna-Mar A, Olona M et al.: Prognostic value of p53 protein expression and clinicopathological factors in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. A study of 192 patients. Histol Histopathol 2001; 16: 99-106.
  • Tsutsui S, Ohno S, Murakam S et al.: Prognostic value of p53 protein expression in breast cancer; an immunohistochemical analysis of frozen sections in 514 Japanese women. Breast Cancer 2001; 8: 194-201.
  • EORTC Breast Cancer Group. Manual for clinical research in breast cancer. 5th ed. Glasgow, UK 2004.
  • Tubiana M, Koscielny S: Natural history of human breast cancer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1991; 18: 125-40.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Rivandeneira DE, Simmons RM, Christos PJ et al.: Predictive factors associated with axillary lymph node metastases in T1a and T1b breast carcinomas: analysis in more than 900 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 1-6.
  • Barth A, Craig PH, Silverstein MJ: Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with T1 breast carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 79: 1918-22.[Crossref]
  • Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R et al.: Frequency and predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 723-28.[Crossref]
  • Mitsuyama S, Anan K, Toyoshima S et al.: Histopathological predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 1999; 6: 237-41.[Crossref]
  • Iwasaki Y, Fukutomi T, Akashi-Tanaka S et al.: Axillary node metastasis from T1N0M0 breast cancer: possible avoidance of dissection in a subgroup. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998; 28: 601-03.
  • Ogawa Y, Moriya T, Kato Y et al.: Immunohistochemical assessment for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer: analysis for cut-off point as the predictor for endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer 2004; 11: 267-75.[Crossref]
  • Reiner A, Reiner G, Spona J et al.: Histopathologic characterization of human breast cancer in correlation with estrogen receptor status. Cancer 1988; 61: 1149-54.[Crossref]
  • Stierer M, Rosen H, Weber R et al.: Immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 13-21.[Crossref]
  • Stonelake PS, Baker PG, Gillespie WM et al.: Steroid receptors, pS2 and Cathepsin D in early clinically node-negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 5-11.[Crossref]
  • Neumann K, Rüschoff J, Horstmann J et al.: Korrelation zwischen immunhistochemisch und biochemisch bestimmtem Progesteronrezeptorgehalt sowie Tumorgrading, Tumorausdehnung, Proliferationsrate und Chromatingehalt beim Mammakarzinom. Tumor Diagnostic Therapie 1989; 10: 109-14.
  • Bianchi S, Calzolari A, Vezzosi V et al.: Lack of prognostic value of p53 protein expression in nodenegative breast cancer. Tumori 1997; 83: 669-72.
  • Caffo O, Doglioni C, Veronese S et al.: Prognostic value of p21WAF and p53 expression in breast carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study in 261 patients with long-term follow-up. Clin Cancer Res 1996; 2: 1591-99.
  • Iwaya K, Tsuda H, Fukutomi T et al.: Histologic grade and p53 immunoreaction as indicators of early recurrence of node-negative breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1997; 27: 6-12.[Crossref]
  • Korkolis DP, Tsoli E, Yiotis J et al.: Tumor histology and stage but not p53, Her2-neu or cathepsin-D expression are independent prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 2004; 24: 2061-68.
  • Thor AD, Liu S, Moore DH et al.: p21WAF/CIP1 expression in breast cancers: associations with p53 and outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 61: 33-43.[Crossref]
  • de Mascarel I, Bonichon F, Durand M et al.: Obvious peritumor emboli: an elusive prognostic factor reappraised. Multivariate analysis of 1320 node-negative breast cancers. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 58-65.
  • Ilknur GB, Hilmi A, Tulay C et al.: The importance of extracapsular extension of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Tumori 2004; 90: 107-11.
  • Rosen PP, Groshen S: Factors influencing survival and prognosis in early breast carcinoma (T1N0M0-T1N1M0). Assessment of 644 patients with median follow-up of 18 years. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70: 937-62.
  • Hawkins RA: How best to express oestrogen receptor activity. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: S21-S23.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Mittra I, Redkar AA, Badwe RA et al.: Prognosis of breast cancer: evidence for interaction between c-erbB-2 overexpression and number of involved axillary lymph nodes. J Surg Oncol 1995; 60: 106-11.[Crossref]
  • Takashima T, Onoda N, Ishikawa T et al.: Prognostic value of combined analysis of estrogen receptor status and cellular proliferative activity in breast cancer patients with extensive lymph node metastases. Oncol Rep 2002; 9: 589-94.
  • Biesterfeld S, Schröder W, Steinhagen G et al.: Simultaneous immunohistochemical and biochemical hormone receptor assessment in breast cancer provides complementary prognostic information. Anticancer Res 1997; 17: 4723-30.
  • Early Breast Cancer Trailists' Collaborative Group. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy: 133 randomized trials involving 31000 recurrences and 24000 deaths among 75000 women. Lancet 1992; 339: 71-85.
  • Zalecenia postępowania diagnostyczno-terapeutycznego w nowotworach złośliwych u dorosłych. Red. M. Krzakowski, Warszawa 2003.
  • Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach; red. R. Pazdur i inni - CMP nineth edition 2005-2006.
  • Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kułakowski
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-007-0013-y
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.