Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2007 | 79 | 2 | 70-77

Article title

Problems Associated with Forearm Reimplantation


Title variants

Languages of publication



The aim of the study was to present the technical and qualification problems associated with forearm reimplantation.Material and methods. The analysed group included 29 patients, 25 male and 4 female, who had in the period of 10 years (between January 1994 and December 2003) undergone 10 reimplantations and 19 revascularisations (partial amputation) of the forearm. The age of the patients ranged from 19 to 63 years. Due to massive limb destruction, 8 patients only underwent wound revision. The number of operations performed within the 4 distinct zones of the forearm was as follows: I - 8 patients, II - 17, III - 3, IV - 1; 20 (69%) of cases were the result of crush-avulsion injuries. The bones were stabilised by means of intramedullary nails, muscle bellies were sutured with mattress sutures, and the torn-off tendons were reinserted to the bellies by Chen's method. We attempted anastomosis of two main forearm arteries and the greatest possible number of veins, and a vein graft was applied in 2 cases. The operative wound was closed with skin graft in 4 patients.Results. There were 5 failures (17.2%). Nine patients required secondary reconstructive procedures for bone issues, 4 patients for nerves, and 3 for tendons. The operations were performed between 20 to 29 months after the reimplantation. The functional results were assessed according to Chen's scheme. 2 patients achieved grade I, 9 grade II, 13 grade III, and 5 grade IV. Two patients, the farmers, regained their previous profession. All of the patients were satisfied with regaining the limb.Conclusions. Problems encountered in forearm reimplantation are due to unfavorable mechanisms of trauma. The technical aspects of such surgeries require a highly qualified surgical team. The prognosis for survival and functional recovery is lower in proximal as compared to distal injuries.








Physical description


1 - 2 - 2007
24 - 9 - 2007


  • Department of General Surgery, Subdepartment of Limbs Replantation, St. Hedwig's Hospital, Trzebnica Ordynator
  • Department of General Surgery, Subdepartment of Limbs Replantation, St. Hedwig's Hospital, Trzebnica Ordynator
  • Department of General Surgery, Subdepartment of Limbs Replantation, St. Hedwig's Hospital, Trzebnica Ordynator
  • Department of General Surgery, Subdepartment of Limbs Replantation, St. Hedwig's Hospital, Trzebnica Ordynator
  • Department of General Surgery, Subdepartment of Limbs Replantation, St. Hedwig's Hospital, Trzebnica Ordynator


  • Goldner RD, Urbaniak JR: Replantation. W: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pedersen WC (red.) Green's Operative Hand Surgery, wyd IV, New York, Churchil Livingstone, 1999; s. 468.
  • Pederson WC: Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 823-41.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Axelrod TR, Buchler U: Severe complex injuries to the upper extremity: Revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg 1991; 16A: 574-84.
  • Walaszek I, Puchalski P, Żyluk A: Makroreplantacje w obrębie kończyny górnej - wyniki leczenia. W: IV Kongres Polskiego Towarzystwa Chirurgii Ręki, Wrocław 17-19 listopada 2005; Streszczenia 2005; s. 57.
  • da Silva PN, Marques M, Malheiro E et al.: Upper limb replantations - 10 year analysis (1992-2001). J Hand Surg (Br) Suppl 2003; 28B: 73.
  • Meyer V: Upper extremity replantation, Churchil Livingstone, New York 1985.
  • Chew WY, Tsai TM: Major upper limb replantation. Hand Clin 2000; 17(3): 395-410.
  • Chen ZW, Quian YQ, Yu ZJ: Extremity replantation. World J Surg 1978; 2: 513-21.
  • Chen ZW, Wei Ch: Principles of replantation and revascularization. W: Weinzweig N, Weinzweig J (red) The mutilated hand, Philadelphia 2005.
  • Chuang DC, Lai JB, Cheng SL et al.: Traction avulsion amputation of the major limb: a proposed new classification, guidelines for acute management, and strategies for secondary reconstruction. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl) 1995; 264: 7-8.
  • Jabłecki J, Kaczmarzyk J, Kaczmarzyk L i wsp.: Wyniki replantacji kończyny górnej w strefie nadgarstka. Pol Przegl Chir 2006; 78: 976-89.
  • Jabłecki J, Kaczmarzyk J, Kaczmarzyk L i wsp.: Problemy replantacji kończyn amputowanych na wysokości ramienia. Chir Narz Ruchu Ortop Pol 2004; 69: 9-14.
  • Berger A, Hierner R, Becker AH et al.: Replantationschirurgie. Unfallchirurg 1997; 100: 694-704.[Crossref]
  • Zhong J, Chen ZW: Retrospective of the replantation of severed limbs in the Peoples Republic of China: current status and prospects. Microsurgery 2002; 22: 39-43.[Crossref]
  • Graham B, Adkins P, Tsai TM: Major replantation versus revision amputation and prosthesis fitting in upper extremity: a late results study. J Hand Surg (Am) 1998; 23: 783-91.[Crossref]
  • Razana A, Tyzan M, Pathamanathan V: Hand replantation and revascularization- six years experience in Hospital Kuala Lumpur1990-95. Med J Malaysia 1998; 53: 121-30.
  • Kocięba R, Jabłecki J: Replantacja kończyn. W: Noszczyk W (red): O Chirurgii polskiej końca XX wieku. Fundacja Polski Przegląd Chirurgiczny. Warszawa 2001; s. 476-480.
  • Hierner R, Berger A, Brenner P: Considerations of subtotal and total macro-amputation of the upper extremity. Microsurgery 1994; 15(7): 474-78.
  • Molski M: Replantacje palców i rąk po urazach awulsyjno-zmiażdżeniowych. 3. Polsko-Niemieckie Sympozjum Chirurgii Ręki. Szczecin, 07-08 kwietnia 2006, Streszczenia, s 20.
  • Kocięba R, Wilowska-Kocięba L, Kaczmarzyk J i wsp.: Powikłania w replantacji kończyn w 18-letnim doświadczeniu ośrodka. Pol Hand Surg 1993; 18: 25-28.
  • Zimmer K, Rutowski R, Gosk J: Możliwości pozaanatomicznych rekonstrukcji w urazowych uszkodzeniach splotu ramiennego. 2. Kongres Polskiego Towarzystwa Chirurgii Ręki, Szczecin-Międzyzdroje, 4-6 10 2001, Abstracts, s. 53.
  • Haftek J, Kasprzak H: Anastomoza nerwu zasłonowego z nerwem kulszowym w przypadku wysokiego, nieoperacyjnego porażenia nerwu kulszowego. Chir Narz Ruchu Ortop Pol 1983; 47: 269-72.
  • Skowroński J: Wartość rekonstrukcji nerwów obwodowych w wielotkankowych uszkodzeniach kończyn górnych. Badania kliniczne i doświadczalne. Praca habilitacyjna. Białystok 1984.
  • Lutz B, Klauke T, Dietrich E: Late results after microvascular reconstruction of severe crushed and avulsion injuries of the upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 1997; 13: 421-29.
  • Houze de L'Aulnoit S, Schoofs M, Leps P: Macroreimplantation of the upper limb. Results in 24 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1998; 43(2): 175-81.
  • Raskin KB, Weiland AJ: Current concepts of replantation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995; 24 (4 Suppl): 131-34.[PubMed]
  • Zhong J, Chen ZW: Retrospective of the replantation of severed limbs in the Peoples Republic of China:current status and prospects. Microsurgery 2002; 22: 39-43.[Crossref]
  • Walaszak I, Zyluk A: Replantacje w obrębie kończyny górnej - przegląd piśmiennictwa. Pol Przegl Chir 2001; 73: 1049-56.
  • Chew WY, Tsai TM: Major limb replantation. Hand Clin 2001; 17(3): 395-410.
  • Ipsen T, Lundkvist L, Barfred T et al.: Princeples of evaluation and results in microsurgical treatment of major limb amputations. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1990; 24: 75-80.
  • Buncke HJ: Microvascular hand surgery - transplants and replants over the past 25 years. J Hand Surg (Am) 2000; 25: 415-20.
  • Engel J, Luboshitz S, Jaffe B et al.: To trim or to replant - a matter of cost. World J Surg 1991; 15, 486-91.[Crossref]
  • Gasperschitz F, Genelin F, Karlbauer A: Decrese in disability pension following replantation. Handchir Microchir Plast Chir 1990; 22: 78-81.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.