Removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions by micellar enhanced ultra-filtration (MEUF)

• Authors: Katarzyna Staszak , Beata Redutko , Krystyna Prochaska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The results of preliminary research on the possibility of removing of chromium(III) and copper(II) ions from micellar solutions in MEUF were described. The effectiveness of metal ions removal in the classical UF and MEUF was compared. It was confirmed that in the classical UF the retention of metal ions is small, independent of the concentration of the feed solution. The cross-flow micellar enhanced ultrafiltration experiments showed the usefulness of this method for the separation of metal ions from micellar solutions. The retention of metal ions in MEUF process is almost total in the case of the solutions of low concentration. However, for more concentrated solutions the retention is much smaller.

Keywords

EN

removal of metal ions; micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; MEUF

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Polish Journal of Chemical Technology
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 62-65

Dates

published

1 - 1 - 2010

online

27 - 9 - 2010

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Staszak

• Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 2, 60-965 Poznań, Poland

author

Beata Redutko

• Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 2, 60-965 Poznań, Poland

author

Krystyna Prochaska

• Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 2, 60-965 Poznań, Poland

References

• Li, X., Zeng, G. M., Huang, J. H., Zhang, C., Fang, Y. Y., Qu, Y. H., Luo, F., Lin, D. & Liu, H. L. (2009). Recovery and reuse of surfactant SDS from a MEUF retentate containing Cd2+ or Zn2+ by ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 337, 92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.030.[WoS][Crossref]
• Anielak, A. M. (2002). Chemical and physico-chemical wastewater treatment. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).
• Szymanowski, J. (1990). Extraction of copper by hydroxyoximes. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa (in Polish).
• Szymanowski, J. (2003). New trends in extraction processes. Przem. Chem. 82/8-9, 792-793 (in Polish).
• Karapinar, K. J. & Kargi, F. (2002). Simultaneous bio-degradation and adsorption of textile dyestuff in an activated sludge unit. Process Biochem. 37, 973-981. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00309-0.[Crossref]
• Robinson, T., Chandran, B. & Nigam, P. (2002). Removal of dyes from a synthetic textile dye effluent by biosorption on apple pomace and wheat straw. Water Res. 36, 2824-2830. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00521-8.[Crossref]
• Papic, S., Koprivanoc, N., Loncavic Bozic, A. & Metes, A. (2004). Removal of some reactive dyes from synthetic wastewater by combined Al(III) coagulation/karbon adsorption process. Dyes Pigments 62, 291-298. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7208(03)00148-7.[Crossref]
• Witek, A., Kołtuniewicz, A., Kurczewski, B., Radziejowska, M. & Hatalski, M. (2006). Simultaneous removal of phenols and Cr(III) rusing mecellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process. Desalination 191, 111-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.024.[Crossref]
• Fillipi, B. R., Scamehorn, J. F., Christian, S. D. & Taylor, R. W. (1998). A comparative economic analysis of copper removal from water by ligand-modified micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and by conventional solvent extraction. J. Membr. Sci. 145, 27-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00052-0.[Crossref]
• Aoudia, M., Allal, N., Djennet, A. & Toumi, L. (2003). Dynamic micellar enhanced ultrafiltration: use of anionic (SDS)-nonionic (NPE) system to remove Cr(III) at low surfactant concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 217, 81-192. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00128-5.[Crossref]
• Kim, H. J., Baek, K., Kim, B. K. & Yang, J. W. (2005). Humic substance-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of kobalt. J. Hazard. Mater. A 122, 31-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.043.[Crossref]
• Muthukrishnan, M. & Guha, B. K. (2006). Heavy metal separation by using surface modified nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 200, 351-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.371.[Crossref]
• Huang, J. H., Zeng, G. M. & Xu, K. (2005). Removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solution via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 15, 184-189.
• Xu, K., Zeng, G. M. & Huang, J. H. (2007). Removal of Cd2+ from synthetic wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with hollow fiber membrane. Colloid Surf. A 294, 140-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.08.017.[Crossref]
• Juang, R. S., Xu, Y. Y. & Chen, C. L. (2003). Separation and removal of heavy metal ions from dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 218, 257-267. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)183-2.[Crossref]
• Yurlova, L., Kryvoruchko, A. & Kornilovich, B. (2002). Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination 144, 255-260. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00321-1.[Crossref]
• Zhang, Z., Zeng, G. M. & Huang, J. H. (2007). Removal of zinc ions from aqueous solution using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration at low surfaktant concentrations. Water SA 33, 129-136.
• Garcia-Anton, J. & Guinon J. L. (1991). Determination of Hyamine 2389 critical micelle concentration (CMC) by means of conductometric, spectrophotometric and polarographic methods. Colloid Surface 61, 137-145.
• Cygański, A. (1999). Chemical methods of quantitative analysis. Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa (in Polish).
• Bielska, M. & Prochaska, K. (2007). Dyes separation by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions. Dyes and Pigments 74, 410-415, DOI:10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.03.001.[WoS][Crossref]
• Ennigrou, D. J., Gzara, L. & Ben Romdhane M. R. (2009). Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by polyelectrolyte enhanced ultrafiltration, Desalination 246, 363-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.053.[WoS][Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10026-010-0036-8