Quality assurance and dosimetric analysis of intensity modulation radiotherapy using compensators for head and neck cancers
Languages of publication
In this study we describe our experience in implementing compensator based intensity modulated radiotherapy (cIMRT) for head and neck cancer with regard to pre treatment quality assurance (QA), dosimetric parameters and other technical detail.This study represents the analysis of initial 48 patients who underwent cIMRT for head and neck cancers. All patients were treated with pre treatment QA in terms of point dose with ion chamber and spatial dose comparison with film dosimetry.In our study for all 48 patients, compensators revealed a deviation in central axis dose of 2% ± 1.8% in terms of cumulative calculated versus measured dose. Target coverage for high dose volume (70 Gy) was adequate in terms of volume receiving 93% and 95% of the prescription dose, which was 98.5% and 97.5% respectively. Parotid and other critical organs were spared adequately. Contralateral parotid (CLP) was spared. V30 Gy and V35 Gy was 55.9% and 36.8% for CLP and average dose was 31.7 Gy. Median variation in cumulative measured dose versus cumulative calculated dose was 1.8% (SD + 1.8) and mean variation was 2.5% (95%CI 1.5, 2.6). Range was 0 to 7%.cIMRT is practically feasible. Our QA tests revealed high degree of concordance between cumulative measured doses versus cumulative calculated doses. All dosimetric parameters were within acceptable limits. The manufacturing of compensator is cumbersome but it is a one time job followed by easy treatment delivery and simple QA procedure, high monitor unit (MU) efficiency and less treatment time. cIMRT is easy to implement and now can be applied to larger number of patients with different type of tumor.
1 - 1 - 2009
22 - 9 - 2010
- Bortfeld T, Schlegel W, Rhein B. Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculations in three-dimensional treatment planning. Med Phys. 1993; 20: 311-318.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Boyer AL. Compensating filters for high energy X rays. Med Phys. 1982; 9: 429-433.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Chang SX, Cullip TJ, Deschesne KM, et al. Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004; 5: 15-36.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Chufal KS, Nangia S, Tyagi A et al. 2439: Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Using Compensators for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Impact of Dosimetric Parameters on Clinical Outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1; 66(3): S453-454.
- Djordjevich A, Bonham DJ, Hussein EM, Andrew JW, Hale ME. Optimal design of radiation compensators. Med Phys. 1990; 17: 397-404.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Esthappan J, Mutic S, Harms WB, Dempsey JF, Low DA. Dosimetry of therapeutic photon beams using an extended dose range film. Med Phys. 2002; 29: 2438-45.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Fact sheet atuimo 2.5D 72200-0153/Rev. 01/ 02.2005. Bebig Isotopen-und Medizintechnik GmbH.
- Faddegon BA, Pfalzner P. Computer aided design and verification of megavoltage tissue compensators for oblique beams. Med Phys. 1988; 15: 757-762.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Garry A, Ezzal, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys. 2003; (30): 2089-2115.
- Jiang SB, Ayyangar KM. On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy. Med Phys. 1998: 25(5): 668-675.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Lee N, Xia P, Fischbein NJ, Akazawa P, Akazawa C, Quivey JM. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 57: 49-60.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Mageras GS, Mohan R, Burman C, Barest GD, Kutcher GJ. Compensators for three-dimensional treatment planning. Med Phys. 1991; 18: 133-40.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Nangia S, Chufal KS, Arivazhagan V, Srinivas P, Tyagi A, Ghosh D. Compensator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: our experience in achieving dosimetric parameters and their clinical correlation. Clin Oncol. 2006; 18: 485-92.[Crossref]
- Olch AJ. Dosimetric accuracy of the ITP inverse treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2002; 29: 2484-8.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Olch AJ. Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance. Med Phys. 2002; 29: 2159-2168.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Preiser K, Bortfeld T, Hartwig K, Schlegel W, Stein J. A new program for inverse radiotherapy planning. In: Proceeding of XII international conference on the use of computers in radiation therapy; Salt Lake City, Utah. 1997. p. 425-428.
- Salz H, Wiezorek T, Scheithauer M, et al. IMRT with compensators for head-and-neck cancers treatment technique, dosimetric accuracy, and practical experiences. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005; 181: 665-672.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Yoda K, Aoki Y. A multiportal compensator system for IMRT delivery. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 880-886.[PubMed][Crossref]
Publication order reference