PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2009 | 15 | 1 | 1-9
Article title

EFOMP project on the role of biomedical physics in the education of healthcare professionals

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The policy statements describing the role of the medical physicist (and engineer) published by organizations representing medical physics (and engineering) in Europe include the responsibility of providing a contribution to the education of healthcare professionals (physicians and paramedical professions). As a consequence, medical physicists and engineers provide educational services in most Faculties of Medicine / Health Science in Europe. In 2005, the EFOMP council took the decision to set up a Special Interest Group to develop the role of the medical physics educator in such faculties and to work with other healthcare professional groups to produce updated European curricula for them. The effort of the group would provide a base for the progress of the role, its relevance to contemporary healthcare professional education and provide input for future EFOMP policy documents regarding this important aspect of the role of the medical physicist. The present communication will present the group, summarise its latest research and indicate future research directions.
Publisher

Year
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 1 - 2009
online
22 - 9 - 2010
Contributors
  • EFOMP, Special Interest Group ‘Biomedical Physics Education, University of Malta
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Medicine, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
author
  • Formerly, Faculty of Chemistry and Physics, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
  • Faculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
author
  • University Hospital, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
author
  • VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
author
  • Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
author
  • Faculty of Medicine, Jagellonian University, Krakow, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
author
  • Klinikum Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
References
  • Balter S. Why (continue to) study physics? Radiographics. 1992; 12: 609.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Barnes JE, Berry PC, Dennis MJ. AAPM Report 64: a guide to the teaching of clinical radiological physics to residents in diagnostic and therapeutic radiology. Medical Physics Publishing; 1999. Madison WI, US.
  • Baumann M, Leer JW, Dahl O, De Neve W, Hunter R, Rampling R, Verfaillie C. Updated European core curriculum for radiotherapists (radiation oncologists). Radiother Oncol. 2004; 70: 107-13.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Caruana CJ. A summary account of the historical development and present state of the role of biomedical physics-engineering in the education of the healthcare professions. Proc. GIREP-EPEC Conf. 2007, Frontiers in Physics Education, Opatija, Croatia.
  • Caruana CJ. A strategic role development primer for physics educators in higher education: some general principles and their application to the case of a physicist teaching in a Faculty of Medicine / Health Science. Proc. GIREP-EPEC Conf. 2007, Frontiers in Physics Education, Opatija, Croatia.
  • Caruana CJ, Plasek J. An inventory of biomedical imaging physics elements-of-competence for diagnostic radiography education in Europe. Radiography. 2006; 12: 189-202.
  • Caruana CJ, Plasek J. A SWOT Audit for the Educator Role of the Biomedical Physics Academic within Faculties of Health Science in Europe. Proceedings GIREP 2006. Modeling in Physics and Physics Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Caruana CJ, Plasek J. A systematic review of the biomedical physics component within undergraduate medical curricula in Europe. Biomedizinische Technik. 2005; 50 Suppl. Vol 1 Pt 2: 931-2.
  • Caruana CJ, Plasek J. A biomedical physics elements-of-competence inventory for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Biomedizinische Technik. 2005; 50 Suppl. Vol. 1 Pt 1: 31-2.
  • Coffey M, Degerfalt J, Osztavics A, van Hedeld J, Vandevelde G. Revised European core curriculum for RTs. Radioth Oncol. 2004; 70: 137-58.[Crossref]
  • Dendy PP. Radiation protection in the basic curriculum of medical students. Retr. Apr 8 2005 from
  • Dendy PP. Syllabus for a course in Diagnostic Imaging - physical and biological aspects for doctors undergoing specialist training in radiology. Retr. April 8 2005 from
  • Dennis M, Rzeszotarski M, Hendee WR. Point-Counterpoint: To prepare radiology residents properly for the future, their physics education should be expanded in breadth and depth, and should be more quantitative and mathematically-based. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 1956-7.
  • EAR. European training charter for clinical radiology. EAR; 2005. Vienna.
  • European Commission. Directorate General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection. (2000). Radiation Protection 116 - Guidelines on education and training in radiation protection for medical exposures. Luxembourg. Retr. April 8 2007 from
  • Fasce E, Calderon M, Braga L, De Orue M, Mayer H, Wagemann H, Cid S. Problem based learning in the teaching of physics to medical students - Comparison with traditional teaching. Rev Med Chil. 2001; 129: 1031-7.
  • Frey GD, Dixon RL, Hendee WR. Point-Counterpoint. Physics concepts that cannot be explained from a clinical context should be omitted in physics courses for radiologists. Med Phys. 2002; 29: 255-6.[Crossref]
  • Hayter CR. Physics for physicians: integrating science into the medical curriculum 1910-1950. Acad Med. 1996; 71: 1211-7.
  • Karenauskaite V, Dikcius G, Macyte A, Rotomskis R. The Systematic Approach to a Biomedical Physics Course: a Case Study at Vilnius University. Proc. GIREP 2006. Modeling in Physics and Physics Education. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Mornstein V. Medical biophysics - yesterday, today and tomorrow. Scripta Medica. 2005; 78: 203-4.
  • Pabst R, Rothkotter HJ. Retrospective evaluation of a medical curriculum by final-year students. Medical Teacher. 1996; 18: 288-293.[Crossref]
  • Rehani MM. Training of interventional cardiologists in radiation protection - the IAEA's initiatives. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 114: 256-60.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Saba PR, Poller WR. Physics for radiologists: now more than ever! Acad Radiol. 1999; 6: 261-3.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Vano E, Gonzalez L, Faulkner K, Padovani R, Malone JF. Training and accreditation in radiation protection for interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001; 94: 137-42.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Vano E, Gonzalez L. Accreditation in radiation protection for cardiologists and interventionalists. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 117: 69-73.[PubMed]
  • Vano E, Gonzalez L, Canis M, Hernandez-Lezana A. Training in radiological protection for interventionalists. Initial Spanish experience. Br J Radiol. 2003; 76: 217-9.[PubMed][Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10013-009-0001-0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.