Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2010 | 5 | 4 | 442-446
Article title

Removal and successful re-implantation of a customized interpositional knee device following an early postoperative infection: A case report

Title variants
Languages of publication
We report the first case of early postoperative infection after a medial hemiarthroplasty of the knee with a customized ConforMIS iForma™ interpositional device. The infection was treated successfully by revision surgery with implant removal and antibiotic therapy. Despite the additional diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis that did not affect the treated knee, the preservation of bony and ligamentous structures enabled a successful re-implantation of another iForma™ implant 9 months later with good clinical results at follow-up examination 1 year postoperatively. This is very much in contrast to the extensive and complex revision surgery, with significant bone loss, in patients with infected unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasties. The iForma™ device may be an alternative treatment option in early and moderate unicompartmental arthritis of the knee, with easy revision with the same type of implant in the rare case of infection.
Physical description
1 - 8 - 2010
30 - 5 - 2010
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany
  • [1] MacIntosh D.L., Hemiarthroplasıy of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. In Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Orthopaedic Associations of the English-Speaking World. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 1959, 40, 1431
  • [2] McKeever D.C., Elliott R.B. Tibial plateau prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1960, 18, 86–95
  • [3] Scott R.D., Joyce M.J., Ewald F.C., Thomas W.H., McKeever metallic hemiarthroplasty of the knee in unicompartmental degenerative arthritis. Longterm clinical follow-up and current indications. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 1985, 67, 203–207
  • [4] Emerson R., Potter T., The use of the McKeever metallic hemiarthroplastsy for unicompartmental arthritis. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 1988, 67, 208–2012
  • [5] Springer B.D., Scott R.D., Sah A.P., Carrington R., McKeever hemiarthroplasty of the knee in subjects less than sixty years old. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 2006, 88, 366–371[Crossref]
  • [6] Hastings D.E., Hewitson W.A., Double hemiarthroplasty of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis. A survey of fifty consecutive cases. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br] 1973, 55, 112–118
  • [7] Bailie A.G., Lewis P.L., Brumby S.A., Roy S., Paterson R.S., Campbell D.G., The Unispacer knee implant: Early clinical results. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br], 2008, 90, 446–450[Crossref][WoS]
  • [8] Hallock R.H., Fell B.M., Unicompartmental tibial hemiarthroplasty: early results of the UniSpacer knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2003, 416, 154–163[Crossref]
  • [9] Sisto D.J., Mitchell I.L., Unispacer arthroplasty of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 2005, 87, 1706–1711[Crossref]
  • [10] Koeck F.X., Perlick L., Luring C., Handel M., Beckmann J., Linhardt O., Grifka J., Leg axis correction with ConforMIS iForma™ (interpositional device) in unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Int. Orthop., 2008, 33, 955–960[WoS][Crossref]
  • [11] Chesney D., Sales J., Elton R., Brenkel I.J,. Infection after knee arthroplasty a prospective study of 1509 cases. J. Arthroplasty, 2008, 23, 355–359[Crossref]
  • [12] Jämsen E., Huotari K., Huhtala H., Nevalainen J., Konttinen Y.T., Low rate of infected knee replacements in a nationwide series-is it an underestimate? Acta Orthop., 2009, 80, 205–212[WoS][Crossref]
  • [13] Jämsen E., Huhtala H., Puolakka T., Moilanen T., Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 2009, 91, 38–47[Crossref]
  • [14] Zimmerli W., Ochsner P.E., Management of infections associated with prosthetic joints. Infection, 2003, 31, 93–102[Crossref]
  • [15] MacIntosh D.L., Hunter G.A., The use of the hemiarthroplasty prosthesis for advanced osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br], 1972, 54, 244–255
  • [16] Potter T.A., Weinfeld M.S., Thomas W.H., Arthroplasty of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. A follow-up study after implantation of the McKeever and MacIntosh prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am], 1972, 54, 1–24
  • [17] Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J. Rheumatol., 1988, 15, 1833–1840
  • [18] Whitehouse S.L., Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Learmonth I.D., Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br], 2003, 85, 706–711
  • [19] Stengel D., Bauwens K., Sehouli J., Ekkernkamp A., Porzsolt F.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic therapy for bone and joint infections. Lancet infect dis. 2001, 1, 175–188[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.