Journal
Article title
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
We performed an intermittency analysis of the proton density fluctuations in transverse momentum space for the collisions Si+A (A=Al,Si,P) and C+A (A=C,N) at maximum SPS energy $\sqrt {s_{NN} } $ ≈ 17 GeV). In our analysis we used exclusively proton tracks in the midrapidity region (|y
CM| ≤ 0.75). For the Si+A system we find signature of power-law distributed density fluctuations quantified by the intermittency index ϕ
2 which approaches in size the predictions of critical QCD [Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 032002 (2006)]. This result supports further the recent findings of power-law fluctuations in the density of (π
+, π
−) pairs with invariant mass close to their production threshold for the Si+Si at the same energy, reported in [Phys. Rev. C 81, 064907 (2010)].
CM| ≤ 0.75). For the Si+A system we find signature of power-law distributed density fluctuations quantified by the intermittency index ϕ
2 which approaches in size the predictions of critical QCD [Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 032002 (2006)]. This result supports further the recent findings of power-law fluctuations in the density of (π
+, π
−) pairs with invariant mass close to their production threshold for the Si+Si at the same energy, reported in [Phys. Rev. C 81, 064907 (2010)].
Journal
Year
Volume
Issue
Pages
1330-1332
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 12 - 2012
online
4 - 12 - 2012
Contributors
author
- Department of Physics, wUniversity of Athens, GR-15771, Athens, Greece, nantonio@phys.uoa.gr
author
- Department of Physics, wUniversity of Athens, GR-15771, Athens, Greece, ndavis@phys.uoa.gr
author
- Department of Physics, wUniversity of Athens, GR-15771, Athens, Greece, fdiakono@phys.uoa.gr
References
- [1] P. Seyboth, Nucl. Phys. A 862, 54 (2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.05.020[Crossref]
- [2] M. Gazdzicki, J. Phys. G 38, 124024 (2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/38/12/124024[Crossref]
- [3] M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4816 (1998) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4816[Crossref]
- [4] H. Fujii, Phys. Rev. D 67, 094018 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.094018[Crossref]
- [5] M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 032301 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.032301[Crossref]
- [6] B. Mohanty, Nucl. Phys. A 830, 899c (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.10.132[Crossref]
- [7] Y. Hatta, M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 102003 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.102003[Crossref]
- [8] N. G. Antoniou, Y. F. Contoyiannis, F. K. Diakonos, A. I. Karanikas, C. N. Ktorides, Nucl. Phys. A 693, 799 (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00921-6[Crossref]
- [9] N. G. Antoniou, Y. F. Contoyiannis, F. K. Diakonos, G. Mavromanolakis, Nucl. Phys. A 761, 149 (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.07.003[Crossref]
- [10] K. Fukushima, T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/74/1/014001[Crossref]
- [11] D. Bower, S. Gavin, Phys. Rev. C 64, 051902(R) (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.051902[Crossref]
- [12] N. G. Antoniou, Nucl. Phys. B-Proc. Sup. 92, 26 (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(00)01016-1[Crossref]
- [13] N. G. Antoniou, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 1521 (2002)
- [14] Y. Hatta, T. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014028 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.014028[Crossref]
- [15] M. A. Stephanov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 4387 (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X05027965[Crossref]
- [16] M. M. Aggarwal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022302 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022302[Crossref]
- [17] B. Wosiek, Acta Phys. Pol. B 21, 1021 (1990)
- [18] K. M. Wolter, Introduction to Variance Estimation, 2nd edition, (Springer, New York, 2007)
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11534-012-0128-6