Semiclassical fully differential ionization cross sections of helium with negatively charged fast projectiles

• Authors: Ferenc Járai-Szabó , Ladislau Nagy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Fully differential cross sections are calculated for the ionization of helium by negatively charged fast projectiles using a semiclassical model developed previously for the ionization of atoms by positive projectiles. The method is tested in the case of 1 keV electron and 500 keV antiproton projectiles. The semiclassical results show reasonable agreement with the experiments and other theories. The origin of the obtained structures has been investigated by a partial wave analysis.

Keywords

EN

fully differential cross section; ionization; semiclassical approximation

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Open Physics
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 942-947

Dates

published

1 - 8 - 2011

online

30 - 4 - 2011

Contributors

author

Ferenc Járai-Szabó

• Faculty of Physics, Babes-Bolyai University, RO-400084, Cluj-Napoca, str. Kogalniceanu nr. 1, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

author

Ladislau Nagy

• Faculty of Physics, Babes-Bolyai University, RO-400084, Cluj-Napoca, str. Kogalniceanu nr. 1, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

References

• [1] J. Ullrich et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30, 2917 (1997) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/30/13/006[Crossref]
• [2] M. Schulz et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 267, 187 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.009[Crossref]
• [3] J. Ullrich et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/9/203[Crossref]
• [4] C. Dimopoulou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 123203 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.123203[Crossref]
• [5] M. Schulz et al., Nature 422, 48 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01415[Crossref]
• [6] M. Schulz, R. Moshammer, D. Fischer, J. Ullrich, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37, 4055 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/37/20/002[Crossref]
• [7] M. Dürr et al., Phys. Rev. A 77, 032717 (2008) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032717[Crossref]
• [8] D.H. Madison et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 253201 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.253201[Crossref]
• [9] M. Foster et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37, 1565 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/37/8/001[Crossref]
• [10] M. Dürr et al., Phys. Rev. A 75, 062708 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.062708[Crossref]
• [11] R. Dey, A.C. Roy, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 267, 2357 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.05.006[Crossref]
• [12] M. McGovern, D. Assafrão, J.R. Mohallem, C.T. Whelan, H.R.J. Walters, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042707 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042707[Crossref]
• [13] R.G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd edition (Mineola, NewYork, 2002)
• [14] E. Gurjoy, B.K. Thomas, Rep. Prog. Phys. 37, 1345 (1974) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/37/11/001[Crossref]
• [15] I. Bray, A.T. Stelbovics, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6995 (1992) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.6995[Crossref]
• [16] F. Járai-Szabó, L. Nagy, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, 4259 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/40/21/012[Crossref]
• [17] F. Járai-Szabó, L. Nagy, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 267, 292 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.064[Crossref]
• [18] E. Clementi, C. Roetti, At. Data Nucl. DataTables 14, 177 (1974) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(74)80016-1[Crossref]
• [19] E. Everhart, G. Stone, R.J. Carbone, Phys. Rev. 99, 1287 (1955) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.99.1287[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s11534-010-0120-y