PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2010 | 8 | 3 | 594-601
Article title

Evaluation of various sample pre-treatment methods for total and inorganic mercury determination in biological certified reference materials by CVAAS technique

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Sample preparation methods for non-separation cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) sequential inorganic mercury speciation in biological certified reference materials (CRMs) were investigated. The methylmercury concentration was calculated as the difference between total and inorganic mercury. Microwave-assisted decomposition method, and three ultrasonic extraction procedures based on acid leaching with HCl and HCOOH and solubilization with TMAH were employed as sample preparation methods. The replacement of a sample decomposition procedure by extraction prior to analysis by CVAAS, as well as the aspect of speciation analysis is discussed. The limits of detection in the sample were determined as 50 and 10 ng L−1 for inorganic and total mercury, which corresponds to absolute detection limits of 40 and 8 ng g−1 for inorganic and total mercury, respectively. The results were in good agreement with the 95% confidence level t-test of the certified values for total and inorganic mercury in the reference materials investigated. From the analysis of the CRMs, it was evident that the difference between the total and inorganic mercury concentrations agrees with the methylmercury concentration. The relative standard deviation was better than 11% for most of the samples. [...]
Publisher

Journal
Year
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
594-601
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 6 - 2010
online
25 - 4 - 2010
Contributors
author
  • Department of Analytical Chemistry, Politechnika Poznańska, 60-965, Poznań, Poland
References
  • [1] W.L. Clevenger, B.W. Smith, J.D. Winefordner, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 27, 1 (1997) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408349708050578[Crossref]
  • [2] M. Leermakers, W. Baeyens, P. Quevauviller, M. Horvat, Trends Anal. Chem. 24, 383 (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2004.01.001[Crossref]
  • [3] B. Welz, M. Sperling, Atomic absorption spectrometry, 3rd edition (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999)
  • [4] L. Magos, Analyst 96, 847 (1971) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/an9719600847[Crossref]
  • [5] S. Río-Segade, C. Bendicho, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 14, 263 (1999) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a806154h[Crossref]
  • [6] S. Río-Segade, C. Bendicho, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 42, 245 (1999) http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1998.1753[Crossref]
  • [7] A.I. Cabañero Ortiz, Y. Madrid Albarrán, C. Cámara Rica, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 17, 1595 (2002) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b207334j[Crossref]
  • [8] G. Tao, S.N. Willie, R.E. Sturgeon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 14, 1929 (1999) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a906313g[Crossref]
  • [9] M. Kan, S.N. Willie, C. Scriver, R.E. Sturgeon, Talanta 68, 1259 (2006) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2005.07.027[Crossref]
  • [10] C.F. Harrington, S.A. Merson, T.M. D’silva, Anal. Chim. Acta 505, 247 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.046[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11532-010-0020-4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.