PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2012 | 26 | 4 | 35-39
Article title

Research in physiotherapy – selected problems

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Research in the field of physiotherapy creates some controversy. This article seeks to explore and find out the solutions for this issue. Two aspects are discussed: the difficulties in reconciling the specificity of physiotherapy research with methodological standards and the concerns related to patients’ participation in the research. These problems affect the physiotherapists involved in the creation of ethically and methodologically valuable research project. Physiotherapists conducting research struggle to reconcile two sets of values: the role of a researcher and the role of a professional helper. This article discusses the possibility of creating a valuable research project based on the methodological standards within EBM paradigm in relation to the practical aspects of physiotherapy, such as therapy effectiveness and patient-therapist interaction.
Keywords
Publisher

Year
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
35-39
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 12 - 2012
online
31 - 08 - 2013
Contributors
  • Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu, Wydział Fizjoterapii
author
  • Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu, Wydział Fizjoterapii
References
  • 1. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US). The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978 [cited 2012 Nov 15]. Available from: URL: http://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf.
  • 2. Przyłuska- Fiszer A, Wójcik A. Problemy metodologiczne badań naukowych. Diametros 2009; 19: 119-31.
  • 3. Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Ocena artykułów o leczeniu lub zapobieganiu- cz. I: ocena wiarygodności. Med Prakt 1998; 2: 149-55.
  • 4. Haslam N. Humanising medical practice: The role of empathy. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 381-2.
  • 5. Elwyn G, Buetow S, Hibbard J, Wensing M. Respecting the subjective: Quality measurement from the patient’s perspective. BMJ 2007; 335: 1021-2.[WoS]
  • 6. Carter MJ. Evidence-based medicine: an overview of key concepts. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010; 56: 68-85.
  • 7. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2d ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
  • 8. Rutten GM, Harting J, Rutten ST, et al. Measuring physiotherapists' guideline adherence by means of clinical vignettes: A validation study. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 491-500.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 9. Fundacja na rzecz Wspierania Rozwoju Polskiej Farmacji i Medycyny. Raport Polskiego Pacjenta Portret Własny. Warszawa; 2010 [cited 2012 Nov 15]. Available from: URL: http://www.polpharma.pl/pl/fundacja/compliance/raport-z-badania-compliance.
  • 10. Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books; 1979.
  • 11. World Health Organisation (WHO). Adherence to Long Term Therapies - Evidence for Action. Geneva; 2003.
  • 12. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(9): 776-85.
  • 13. Vasey L. DNAs and DNCTs - why do patients fail to begin or complete a course of physiotherapy treatment? Physiotherapy 1990: 76; 575-78.
  • 14. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, et al. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001; 26(5): 331-42.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 15. Kirsten J, Sionnadh M, Klaber J, et al. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review. Man Ther 2010; 15(3-2): 220-8.[WoS]
  • 16. Szczerbińska K, Zalewski Z, Gąsowski J, et al. Udział osób starszych w badaniach klinicznych prezentacja założeń projektu PREDICT. Gerontol Pol 2010; 18(4): 176-182.
  • 17. Guyatt G. Praktyczne aspekty EBM. Med Prakt Ginekol Poł 2003; 3: 72-3.
  • 18. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol Inq 2000; 11(4): 227-68. [Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_rehab-2013-0047
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.