Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 86 | 11 | 523-531
Article title

Peritoneal Adhesions as a Cause of Mechanical Small Bowel Obstruction Based on Own Experience

Title variants
Languages of publication
Bowel obstruction is a condition which has been known for many years. As time goes by, the problem is still often encountered at surgical emergency rooms. More than 20% of emergency surgical interventions are performed because of symptoms of digestive tract obstruction with the disease mostly situated in the small bowel. Rates of causative factors of the disease have changed over recent years and there have been increasingly more cases of small bowel obstruction caused by peritoneal adhesions, i.e., adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO).The aim of the study to analyse the reasons and incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction during two periods of time (1990-1995 and 2005-2010).Material and methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients hospitalized at the 1st Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Provincial Polyclinic Hospital in Płock between 1990 and 1995. The outcomes were compared with another period of 2005-2010.Results. We found that the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction increased from 58 cases in the first period to 215 cases in the second one, and the outcomes improved. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery diminished from 38% to 13%. The mean hospitalization time shortened and was 11.3 days and 6.95 days during 1990-1995 and 2005-2010 periods of time, respectively. In the first group, patients who had a surgery were hospitalized for 17.8 days and those who were treated conservatively for 8.08 days. In the second group, the mean hospital stay decreased to 15.6 days and 5.7 days in the case of surgical and conservative treatment, respectively. The age of onset declined from 56.63 years in the first period to 52.54 years in the other one.Conclusions. Analysed data show an increasing number of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. The highest risk of the disease was associated with operations on the large bowel and gynaecological procedures.
Physical description
3 - 2 - 2015
7 - 10 - 2014
  • 1 Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Provincial Policlinic Hospital in Płock Kierownik: dr n. med.
  • Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Independent Public Hospital of the Warsaw Medical University Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 1 Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Provincial Policlinic Hospital in Płock Kierownik: dr n. med.
  • 1 Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Provincial Policlinic Hospital in Płock Kierownik: dr n. med.
  • Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Postgraduate Medical Education Centre, Professor W. Orłowski Independent Public University Hospital in Warsaw Kierownik: prof. dr hab.
  • 1. Wysocki A, Krzywoń J: Przyczyny niedrożności mechanicznej jelit. Przegl Lek 2001; 58: 507-08.
  • 2. Fevang В, Fevang J, Stangeland L et al.: Complications and Death After Surgical Treatment of Small Bowel Obstruction. A 35-Year Institutional Experience. Ann surg 2000; 231(4): 529-37.
  • 3. Bizer L, Liebling R, Delaney H et al.: Small bowel obstruction: The role of nonoperative treatment in simple intestinal obstruction and predictivecriteria for strangulation obstruction. surgery 1981; 89: 407-13.[PubMed]
  • 4. Mucha P: Small intestinal obstruction. surg clin North Am 1987; 67: 597-620.[PubMed]
  • 5. Kemp J, Finlayson S: Nationwide trends in la-paroscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1181-87.
  • 6. EIIís H: The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. eur J surg suppl 1997; 577: 5-9.
  • 7. Abrycht K, Madycki G, Sztaszkiewicz W i wsp.: Ostra nierdożność przewodu pokarmowego - wciąż aktualny problem chirurgiczny. Wiad lek 1999; 52: 238-41.
  • 8. Ray N, Denton W, Thamer M et al.: Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditure in the united States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 1-9.
  • 9. Ivarsson M, Holmdahl L, Franzén G et al.: Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. Eur J surg 1997; 163: 679-84.
  • 10. Fevang E, Fevang J, Lie S et al.: Long term prognosis after operation for small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 193-201.[Crossref]
  • 11. Weibel M, Majno G: Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 1973; 126: 345-53[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 12. Menzies D, Ellis H: Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 60-63.
  • 13. Ouaïssi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N et al.: Postoperative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. Visc surg 2012; 149: 104-14.[Crossref]
  • 14. Barmparas G, Branco В, schnüriger В et al.: The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest surg 2010; 14: 1619-28.[Crossref]
  • 15. Angenete E, Jacobsson A, Gellerstedt M et al.: Effect of laparoscopy on the risk of small-bowel obstruction: a population-based register study. Arch surg 2012; 147: 359-65.
  • 16. Beardsley C, Furtado R, Mosse C et al.: Small bowel obstruction in the virgin abdomen: the need for a mandatory laparotomy explored. Am J surg 2014; 208: 243-248.
  • 17. Wysocki A: Postęp w leczeniu zrostowej niedrożności jelita cienkiego w 2004 roku. Medycyna Praktyczna Chirurgia 2005; 01.
  • 18. Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, stamatiadis a et al.: A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open chole-cystectomy. surg Endosc 2001; 15: 41-43.[Crossref]
  • 19. Dowson H, Bong J, Lovell D et al.: Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. surg 2008; 95: 909-14.
  • 20. seth G, Levrant, Eric J et al.: Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 353-56.
  • 21. Zbar R, Crede W, McKhann C et al.: The postoperative incidence of small bowel obstruction following standard, open appendectomy and cholecy-stectomy: Asix-year retrospective cohort study at Yale-New HavenHospital. Conn Med 1993; 57:123-27.
  • 22. Beck D, Opelka F, Bailey H et al.: Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 241-48.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 23. Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen M, Kuijpers J et al.: Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J surg 1998; 85:1242-45.
  • 24. Cox M, Gunn I, Eastman M et al.: The operative aetiology and types of adhesions causing small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Med 1993; 63: 848-52.
  • 25. Parikh J, Ko С, Maggard M et al.: What is the rate of small bowel obstruction after colectomy? Am Surg 2008; 74: 1001-05.
  • 26. Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ et al. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis colon Rectum 2001; 44: 822-29.
  • 27. Isaksson K, Montgomery A, Moberg A et al.: Long-term Follow-up for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction After Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis. Ann surg 2013; 26: (Epub ahead of print)
  • 28. di Zerega G: Biochemical events in peritoneal tissue repair. eur J surg suppl 1997; 577: 10-16.
  • 29. Rodgers K, di Zerega g: Function of peritoneal exudate cells after abdominal surgery. J Invest Surg 1993; 6: 9-23.[Crossref]
  • 30. Drollette C, Badawy S: Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions: Modern trends in preventing infertility. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 107-22.[PubMed]
  • 31. Audebert A, gomel V: Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil steril 2000; 73: 631-35.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 32. Duepree H, senagore A, Delaney C et al.: Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am coll surg 2003; 197: 177-81.
  • 33. Reshef A, Hull T, Kiran R: Risk of adhesive obstruction after colorectal surgery: the benefits of the minimally invasive approach may extend well beyond the perioperative period. surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1717-20.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 34. Hayanga AJ, Bass-Wilkins K, Bulkley GB: Current Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction. Advances in surgery 2005; 39: 1-33.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 35. Fleshner PR, Siegman MG, Slater GI et al.: A prospective, randomized trial of short versus long tubes in adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Am J surg 1995; 170; 366-70.
  • 36. Cox M, Gunn I, Eastman M et al.: The safety and duration of non-operative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Aust n z J surg 1993; 63: 367-71.
  • 37. Seror D, Feigin E, Szold A: How conservatively can postoperative small bowel obstruction be treated? Am J surg 1993; 165: 121-26.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 38. Franklin M, Dorman J, Pharand D: Laparoscopic surgery in acute small bowel obstruction. surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 4: 289-96.[PubMed]
  • 39. Falk K, Holmadhl L: Foreign materials. W: DiZerega G (red.) Peritoneal surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000: 153-74.
  • 40. Ordoñez J, Domínguez J, Evrard Vet al.: The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 2654-57.[Crossref]
  • 41. Nappi c, Sardo A, Greco E et al.: Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy. Hum Re-prod Update 2007; 13: 379-94.
  • 42. Yesildaglar N, Koninckx P: Adhesion formation in intubated rabbits increases with high insufflation pressure during endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 687-91.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 43. Rout U, Diamond M: Role of plasminogen activators during healing after uterine serosal lesio-ning in the rat. fertil steril 2003; 79: 138-45.[Crossref]
  • 44. Gauwerky J, Heinrich D, Kubli F: Complications of intraperitoneal dextran application for prevention of adhesions. Biological Research in Pregnancy and Perinatology 1986; 7: 93-97.
  • 45. Ahmed N, Falcone T, Tulandi T et al.: Anaphylactic reaction because of intrauterine 32% dextran-70 instillation. fertil steril 1991; 55: 1014-16.
  • 46. di Zerega G, Verco S, Young P et al.: A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1031-38.[Crossref]
  • 47. Menzies D, Hidalgo Pascual M, Walz M et al.: Use of Icodextrin 4% Solution in the Prevention of Adhesion Formation Following General Surgery: From the Multicentre ARIEL Registry. Ann R coll surg Engl 2006; 88: 375-82.
  • 48. Banasiewicz T, Horbacka H, Karoń J et al.: Preliminary study with SprayShield Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions. Videosurgery Miniinv 2013; 8: 301-09.[Crossref]
  • 49. Becker J, Dayton M, Fazio Vet al.: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am coll surg 1996; 183: 297-306.
  • 50. Beck D, Cohen Z, Fleshman J et al.: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdo-minopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1310-19.[Crossref]
  • 51. Guvenal T, cetin A, Özdemir H et al.: Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in rat uterine horn model by nimesulide: a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1732-35.[PubMed]
  • 52. Kirdak T, Uysal E, Korun N: Assessment of effectiveness of different doses of methylpredniso-lone on intraabdominal adhesion prevention. Ulus Travma Acil cerrahi Derg 2008; 14: 188-91.
  • 53. Corrales F, Corrales M, Schirmer C: Preventing intraperitoneal adhesions with vitamin E and sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose: a comparative study in rats. Acta cir Bras 2008; 23: 36-41.[PubMed]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.