Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 86 | 5 | 238-243
Article title

Surgical Gloves – Do they Really Protect Us?

Title variants
Languages of publication
Physical description
1 - 5 - 2014
1 - 7 - 2014
23 - 2 - 2014
  • Department of General Surgery, John Paul II Memorial Hospital in Bełchatów, Ordynator: lek. P. W. Trzeciak
  • Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical University in Łódź, Kierownik: dr hab. Z. Pasieka, prof. nadzw.
  • Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical University in Łódź, Kierownik: dr hab. Z. Pasieka, prof. nadzw.
  • Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical University in Łódź, Kierownik: dr hab. Z. Pasieka, prof. nadzw.
  • Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical University in Łódź, Kierownik: dr hab. Z. Pasieka, prof. nadzw.
  • 1. Ellis H: Evolution of the surgical glove. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 948-50.
  • 2. Ayliffe GA, English MP: Hospital Infection: From Miasmas to MRSA. Wyd. 1, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 2003.
  • 3. Cooper M, O’Leary JP: The use of surgical gloves in the operating room. Am Surg 1999; 65: 90-91.[PubMed]
  • 4. Ellis H: Surgical gloves. J of Perioperative Practice 2010; 20: 219-20.[PubMed]
  • 5. Kielan W, Lazarkiewicz B, Grzebieniak Z et al.: Jan Mikulicz-Radecki: one of the creators of world surgery. Keio J Med 2005; 54: 1-7.[Crossref]
  • 6. Palmer JD, Rickett JW: The mechanisms and risks of surgical glove perforation. J Hosp Infect 1992; 22: 279-86.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 7. Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G: Intraoperative glove perforation gloving in protection against skin contamination. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 458-60.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 8. Bennett JK. The clinical significance of hydration in natural rubber gloves. Surg Serv Mang 1973; 29-33.
  • 9. Miller JM, Collier CS, Griffith NM: Permeability of surgical rubber gloves. Am J Surg 1972; 124: 57-59.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 10. Albin MS, Bunegin L, Duke ES et al.: Anatomy of a defective barrier: sequential glove leak detection in a surgical and dental environment. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 170-84.[Crossref]
  • 11. Cox MJ, Bromberg WJ, Zura RD et al.: New advances in electronic devices for hole detection. J Appl Biomater 1994; 5: 257-64.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 12. Neal JG, Jackson EM, Suber F et al.: Latex glove penetration by pathogens: a review of the literature. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1998; 8: 233-40.[PubMed]
  • 13. Rodeheaver GT, Drake DB, Neal JG et al.: Influence of latex glove hydration on bacteriophage penetration. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1998; 8: 241-48.[PubMed]
  • 14. Hentz RV, Traina GC, Cadossi R et al.: The protective efficacy of surgical latex gloves against the risk of skin contamination: how well are the operators protected? J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000; 11: 825-32.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 15. Laine T, Aarnio P: How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 564-66.
  • 16. Laine T, Aarnio P: Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 898-900.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 17. Hollaus PH, Lax F, Janakiev D et al.: Glove perforation rate in open lung surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 461-64.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 18. Kojima Y , Ohashi M: Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1078-80.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 19. Kuroyanagi N, Nagao T, Sakuma H et al.: Risk of surgical glove perforation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1014-19.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 20. Naver LP, Gottrup F: Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 293-95.
  • 21. Manjunath AP, Shepherd JH, Barton DP et al.: Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies. BJOG 2008; 115: 1015-19.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 22. Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves. ASTM Committee D-11 on Rubber. Subcommittee Dl 1.40 on Consumer Rubber Products. D5151-92: 1-2.
  • 23. European Committee for Standardization. Medical gloves for single use. Part 1: requirements for testing for freedom from holes. EN 455-1: 1993E.
  • 24. Sohn RL, Murray MT, Franko A et al.: Detection of surgical glove integrity. Am Surg 2000; 66: 302-06.[PubMed]
  • 25. Dillon JG, Schroeder LW: Permeability and material characteristics of vulcanized latex film during and following cyclic fatigue in a saline environment. J Appl Polym Sci 1997; 64: 553-64.[Crossref]
  • 26. Guo YP, Wong PM, Li Y et al.: Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery. Am J Surg 2012; 204: 210-15.
  • 27. de Castro-Peraza ME, Garzón-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Pérez V et al.: Glove perforation in surgery and protective effect of double gloves. Enferm Clin 2010; 20: 73-79.
  • 28. Berguer R, Heller P: Preventing sharps injuries in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 462-67.
  • 29. Tanner J: Surgical gloves: perforation and protection. J Perioper Pract 2006; 16: 148-52.
  • 30. Korniewicz D, El-Masri M: Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery. AORN J 2012; 95: 328-36.[PubMed]
  • 31. Bouvet E, Pellissier G, Abiteboul D et al.: Is double gloving an effective barrier to protect surgeons against blood exposure due to needlestick injury? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30: 928-29.[Crossref]
  • 32. Wilson SJ, Sellu D,Uy A et al.: Subjective effects of double gloves on surgical performance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 20-22.
  • 33. Fry DE, Harris WE, Kohnke EN et al.: Influence of double-gloving on manual dexterity and tactile sensation of surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 325-30.
  • 34. Patterson JM, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE et al.: Surrgeons‘ concerns and practices of protection against blood-borne pathogens. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 266-72.
  • 35. REPR0355, Spectrophotometer Measurement of the Colour Indicator Type Surgical Gloves Performed by University of Leeds, Department of Colour Science.
  • 36. Wigmore SJ, Rainey JB: Use of Coloured Undergloves to Detect Glove Puncture. BSJ 1994; 81: 1480.[Crossref]
  • 37. Wittmann A, Kralj N, Köver J et al.: Comparison of 4 different types of surgical gloves used for preventing blood contact. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31: 498-502.
  • 38. Tanner J, Parkinson H: Surgical glove practice: the evidence. J Perioper Pract 2007; 17: 216-8, 220-2, 224-25.
  • 39. Tanner J. Choosing the right surgical glove: an overview and update. Br J Nurs 2008; 17: 740-44.[Crossref]
  • 40. Sonntag P, Hoerner P, Cheymol A et al.: Biocide squirting from an elastomeric tri-layer film. Nat Mater 2004; 3: 311-15.[Crossref]
  • 41. Obłak E, Gamian A: The biological activity of quaternary ammonium salts (QASs) Postepy Hig Med Dosw 2010; 64: 201-11.
  • 42. Daeschlein G, Kramer A, Arnold A et al.: Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39: 98-103.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 43. Bricout F, Moraillon A, Sonntag P et al.: Virus- inhibiting surgical glove to reduce the risk of infection by enveloped viruses. J Med Virol 2003; 69: 538-45.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 44. Krikorian R, Lozach-Perlant A, Ferrier-Rembert A et al.: Standardization of needlestick injury and evaluation of a novel virus-inhibiting protective glove. J Hosp Infect 2007; 66: 339-45.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 45. Brehler R, Kutting B: Natural rubber latex allergy: a problem of interdisciplinary concern in medicine. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1057-64.
  • 46. Bowler G. Safer surgical gloves: evaluation and implementation. J Perioper Pract 2006; 16(2): 67-70.
  • 47. Rego A, Roley L: In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 405-10.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 48. Korniewicz DM: Advantages and Disadvantages of Non-latex Surgical Gloves. Business Briefing: Global Surgery 2004; 64-67.
  • 49. Korniewicz DM, Garzon, Plitcha S: Health care workers: risk factors for nonlatex and latex gloves during surgery. AIHA J 2003; 64: 851-55.[Crossref]
  • 50. Thomas S, Aldlyami E, Gupta S et al.: Unsuitability and high perforation rate of latex-free gloves in arthroplasty: a cause for concern. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 455-58.
  • 51. Watt AM, Patkin M, Sinnott MJ et al.: Scalpel safety in the operative setting: a systematic review. Surgery 2010; 147: 98-106.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 52. Parantainen A, Verbeek JH, Lavoie MC et al.: Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011.[PubMed]
  • 53. Mingoli A, Brachini G, Sgarzini G et al.: Blunt needles for patients‘ and surgeons‘ safety. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 210-11.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.