Conditions of Attending Prophylactic Gynecological Examinations by Women
Languages of publication
Introduction. Low percentage of women who attend prophylactic examinations and also react early to the first symptoms of a disease is a common problem.Aim. The aim of the study was to determine demographic and environmental characteristics which had positive effects on having prophylactic gynecological examinations by women as well as to investigate what significance women's practicing of hormonal contraception had in that question.Material and methods. The study covered 430 women. The conditions of including women into the study group were as follows: age <45 years, commencement of sexual intercourses, maintaining of sexual activity, consent to participate in the study. The method of the study was a diagnostics survey using the questionnaire.Results. The majority of the surveyed women said that they attended prophylactic gynecological examinations regularly. Having prophylactic gynecological examinations was significantly affected (p<0.05) by mean monthly income per capita in the family, practicing and the type of contraception. The joint effect of the surveyed characteristics proved to be significant (p<0.05).Conclusions. The model woman who willingly attends prophylactic gynecological examinations is a young person who lives in a big city, has a university education and a very good financial position confirmed by high family income per capita. Practicing of hormonal contraception by women is a factor that has a beneficial effect on women's care of their health understood as having regular prophylactic gynecological examinations.
10 - 12 - 2014
- 1. ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Primary and preventive care: Periodic Assessments. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1615-22.[PubMed]
- 2. Badania PBS DGA, 30 marca − 1 kwietnia 2007 w ramach programu “Teva − 360 stopni dla zdrowia. [www.zdrowemiasto.pl]. 14 listopad 2007 (On Board).
- 3. Bannach M, Mierzwa T, Grabiec M, et al. Influence of health education on the attendance of women from rural part of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Province at screening program. Ann Acad Med Siles. 2005;59(4):251-6.
- 4. Barnaś E, Borowiec-Domka E, Kądziołka J, et al. Factors affecting the response – rate to cytology examinations of women in the Subcarpathian region, National Programme of Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2008;89(4):482-6.
- 5. Goldhaber-Fiebert J, Denny LA, De Souza M, et al. Program spending to increase adherence: South African Cervical Cancer Screening. PLoS Medi. 2009;4(5):1-6. [www.plosone.org]
- 6. Kozimala M, Mrozewicz A, Ciechaniewicz W. The program of prophylactic examinations focused of women's Heath – evaluation of the program realisation In Lubaczow region. Zdr Publ. 2007;4:462-5.
- 7. Łepecka-Klusek C, Bucholc M, Pilewska A. Women in reproductive age in the face of prophylactic gynecological examinations. Ginekol Pol. 2001;12a:1473-7.
- 8. Leźnicka M, Mierzwa T, Jachimowicz-Wołoszynek D, et al. The individual invitation system vs. women's attendance rate and preventive tests performer as a part of oncological prevention programs. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2009;90(2):627-30.
- 9. Leźnicka M, Mierzwa T, Placek W, et al. The local government activities for the health of the population. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2009;90(1):139-45.
- 10. Marcinkowska M, Mazurkiewicz P, Kozaka J, et al. Reason for low women attendance at mammography screening. Psychoonkol. 2006;10(2):57-63.
- 11. Narodowy Program Zdrowia na lata 2007-2015. Załącznik do Uchwały nr 90/2007 Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 maja 2007.
- 12. Nevin JE, Pharr ME. Preventive care for the menopausal woman. Prim Care. 2002;29(3):583-97.[PubMed]
- 13. Pilewska A, Jakiel G. The analysis of selected conditions influencing the frequency of prophylactic visits at gynaecologist. Wiad Lek. 2004;57(Suppl. 1):246-9.
- 14. Scholle SH, Kelleher K. Assessing primary care performance in an ob-stetrics/gynecology clinic. Women's Health. 2003;37(1):15-30.
- 15. Słopiecka A, Kamusińska E. Health of reproductive organs – women's knowledge and attitudes. Zdr Publ. 2004;114(1):29-36.
- 16. Smith AR, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Issues in Cancer Screening. Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:27-41.[Crossref]
- 17. Spaczyński M. Diagnostyka, profilaktyka i wczesne wykrywanie raka szyjki macicy. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologiczne-go z dnia 7 lipca 2006 roku. Ginekol Dypl. 2008;Special Edition:158-62.
- 18. Woźniak I. Knowledge about female genital organs and breast neoplasm and their attitude toward prophylactic tests. Probl Pielęg. 2008;16(1/2):136-43.
- 19. Stovall DW, Loveless MB, Walden NA, et al. Primary and preventive healthcare in obstetrics and gynecology: a study of practice patterns in the Mid-Atlantic Region. J Women's Health. 2007;16(1):134-8.[WoS]
- 20. Tewari KS, Di Saia Ph J. Primary prevention of uterine cervix cancer: focus of vaccine history and current strategy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2002;29(4):843-68.[Crossref]
- 21. Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Mays J. Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the woman to woman study. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(4):584-90.[PubMed]
- 22. Mauad EC, Nicolau SM, Moreira LF. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance. Rural Remote Health (online). 2009;1241. [www.rrh.org.au].
- 23. Stanisz A. Przystępny kurs statystyki w oparciu o program STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. Kraków: Wyd. StatSoft, Polska; 2001.
- 24. El-Hammasi K, Samir O, Kettaneh S. Use of and attitudes and knowledge about pap smears among women in Kuwait. J Women's Health. 2009;18(11):1825-32.
- 25. Turkistanli WE, Sogukpinar N, Saydam BK. Cervical cancer prevention and early detection-the role of nurses and midwives. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003;4(1):15-21.
Publication order reference