Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2013 | 15 | 2 | 116-121

Article title

Water softening using caustic soda: privileges and restrictions


Title variants

Languages of publication



The aims of the current study is to investigate the constraint of using caustic soda in water treatment and evaluating
its performance in water softening, compared to the other chemical group, including lime and sodium carbonate.
Based on mass balance of reactants in the caustic softening process, a mathematical relation for expressing the
constraint of using caustic soda in water softening was derived. To evaluate caustic soda performance in water
softening and prove the derived relation as well, some experimental works on some water sources including well
water and clarifi er’s inlet water in two oil refi neries were performed. The results showed that compared to limesodium
carbonate, the caustic soda is the best choice for water softening; however, using caustic soda in water
softening, while restrictive mathematical relation does not verify the chemical characteristics of water, could lead
to an extreme increase in alkalinity.









Physical description


1 - 07 - 2013
10 - 07 - 2013


  • Islamic Azad University, Chemical Engineering Department, Ahar Branch, Ahar, Iran
  • Process Engineering Department, Tabriz Oil Refining Company, Tabriz, Iran


  • 1. Maguire, J.J. (1991). Handbook of industrial water conditioning, 9rd. Ed. Inc. Betz Laboratories.
  • 2. Baker, R.W., Cussler, E.L., Eykamp, W., Koros, W.J., Riley, R.L. & Strathmann, H. (1991). Electrodialysis in Membrane Separation Systems, Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, NJ, 396-420.
  • 3. Demand, M. (2006). Power plant evaluation demonstrates the opportunities to use recycled (grey) water. Demand Model Services Ltd.
  • 4. Gabelich, C.J., Rahardianto, A., Northrup, C.R., Yun, T.I. & Cohen, Y. (2011). Process evaluation of intermediate chemical demineralization for water recovery enhancement in production-scale brackish water desalting, Desalination 272, 36-45. Doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.050.[Crossref][WoS]
  • 5. Abdessemed, D. & Nezzal, G. (2008). Coupling softening - ultrafiltration like pretreatment of sea water case study of the Corso plant desalination (Algiers), Desalination 221, 107-113. Doi:10.1016/j. desal.2007.01.072.[Crossref]
  • 6. Rahardianto, A., Gao, J., Gabelich, C.J., Williams, M.D. & Cohen, Y. (2007). High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water:Integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO, J. Membrane Sci. 289, 123-137. Doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.043.[WoS][Crossref]
  • 7. Gabelich, C.J., Williams, M.D., Rahardianto, A., Franklin, J.C. & Cohen, Y. (2007). High-recovery reverse osmosis desalination using intermediate chemical demineralization, J. Membrane Sci. 301, 131-141. Doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.007.[Crossref][WoS]
  • 8. El-Manharawya, S. & Hafezb, A., (2002). Study of seawater alkalization as a promising RO pretreatment Method. Desalination, 153, 109-120.
  • 9. Al-Rehaili, A.M. & Alabdula’aly, A.I. (1999). Chemical and economical evaluation of groundwater treatment plants in Riyadh. Water Res. 33 (15), 3291-3302.
  • 10. Benefield, L.D. & Morgan, J.M. (1990). Chemical Precipitation, Quality and Treatment: A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, 5rd Ed., American Water Works Association.
  • 11. Edward, E. & Baruth (2005). Water Treatment Plant Design, 4rd Ed. McGraw Hill.
  • 12. Brands, H.J. & Tripke, E. (1982). Water Manual, Deutsche Babcock Anlagen, 75.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.