Lower Extremity Muscle Activity During a Women's Overhand Lacrosse Shot

• Authors: Brianna M. Millard , John A. Mercer
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of this study was to describe lower extremity muscle activity during the lacrosse shot. Participants (n=5 females, age 22±2 years, body height 162.6±15.2 cm, body mass 63.7±23.6 kg) were free from injury and had at least one year of lacrosse experience. The lead leg was instrumented with electromyography (EMG) leads to measure muscle activity of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), tibialis anterior (TA), and medial gastrocnemius (GA). Participants completed five trials of a warm-up speed shot (Slow) and a game speed shot (Fast). Video analysis was used to identify the discrete events defining specific movement phases. Full-wave rectified data were averaged per muscle per phase (Crank Back Minor, Crank Back Major, Stick Acceleration, Stick Deceleration). Average EMG per muscle was analyzed using a 4 (Phase) x 2 (Speed) ANOVA. BF was greater during Fast vs. Slow for all phases (p<0.05), while TA was not influenced by either Phase or Speed (p>0.05). RF and GA were each influenced by the interaction of Phase and Speed (p<0.05) with GA being greater during Fast vs. Slow shots during all phases and RF greater during Crank Back Minor and Major as well as Stick Deceleration (p<0.05) but only tended to be greater during Stick Acceleration (p=0.076) for Fast vs. Slow. The greater muscle activity (BF, RF, GA) during Fast vs. Slow shots may have been related to a faster approach speed and/or need to create a stiff lower extremity to allow for faster upper extremity movements.

Keywords

EN

electromyography; sport skill; technique; biomechanics

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Journal of Human Kinetics
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 15-22

Dates

accepted

1 - 6 - 2014

online

8 - 7 - 2014

Contributors

author

Brianna M. Millard

• Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

author

John A. Mercer

• Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

References

• Barrett KR, Collie S. Children learning lacrosse from teachers learning to teach it: The discovery of pedagogical content knowledge by observing children's movement. Res Q Ex and Sport, 1996; 67(3): 297-309
• Bowers AL, Horneff JG, Baldwin KD, Huffman GR, Sennett BJ. Thumb injuries in intercollegiate men's lacrosse. Am J Sports Med, 2010; 38(3): 527-531[WoS][Crossref]
• Colby S, Francisco A, Yu B, Kirkendall D, Finch M, Garrett W. Electromyographic and Kinematic Analysis of Cutting Maneuvers: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Am J Sports Med, 2000; 28(2): 234-240
• Crisco JJ, Drewniak EI, Alvarez MP, Spenciner DB. Physical and mechanical properties of various field lacrosse balls. J Appl Biomech, 2005; 21: 383-393[PubMed]
• Crisco JJ, Rainbow MJ, Wang E. Modeling the lacrosse stick as a rigid Body underestimates shot ball speeds. J Appl Biomech, 2009; 25: 184-191[PubMed]
• Dick R, Romani WA, Agel J, Case JG, Marshall SW. Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's lacrosse injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 20032004. J Ath Training, 2007; 42(2): 255-261
• Elkousy HA, Janssen H, Ferraro J, Levin LS, Speer K. Lacrosse goalkeeper's thumb. A preventable injury. Am J Sports Med, 2000; 28(3): 317-321
• Gutowski AE, Rosene JM. Preseason performance testing battery for men's lacrosse. Strength Cond J, 2011; 33(2): 16-22[WoS][Crossref]
• Hinton RY, Lincoln AE, Almquist JL, Douoguih WA, Sharma KM. Epidemiology of lacrosse injuries in high school-aged girls and boys: a 3-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 2005; 33(9): 1305-1314[Crossref]
• Lincoln AE, Hinton RY, Almquist JL, Lager SL, Dick RW. Head, face, and eye injuries in scholastic and collegiate lacrosse: A 4-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 2007; 35(2): 207-215[WoS]
• Liu S. Estrogen affects the cellular metabolism of the anterior cruciate ligament: A potential explanation for female athletic injury. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 704-709[Crossref]
• Livingston LA. Recent crosse designs increase ball velocity: Implications for injury in women's lacrosse. J Sci Med Sport, 2006; 9: 299-303[Crossref]
• Malinzak R, Colby S, Kirkendall D, Yu B, Garrett W. A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clin Biomech, 2001; 16: 438-445[Crossref]
• Marsh DW, Richard LA, Verre AB, Myers J. Relationships among balance, visual search, and lacrosse-shot accuracy. J Strength Cond Res, 2010; 24(6): 1506-1514[WoS]
• Mercer J, Nielson J. Description of phases and discrete events of the lacrosse shot. Sport J, August 2012
• Oliver GD, Plummer HP, Keeley DW. Muscle activation patterns of the upper and lower extremity during the windmill softball pitch. J Strength Cond Res, 2011; 25(6): 1653-1658[Crossref][WoS][PubMed]
• Pistilli EG, Ginther G, Larsen J. Sport-specific strength-training exercises for the sport of lacrosse. Strength Cond J, 2008; 30(4): 31-38[Crossref]
• Schmidt MN, Gray P, Tyler S. Selected fitness parameters of college female lacrosse players. J Sports Med and Phys Fit, 1981; 21(3): 282-290
• Shaver LG. Body composition, endurance capacity and strength of college lacrosse players. J Sports Med Phys Fit, 1980; 20(2): 213-220
• Yamanouchi T. EMG analysis of the lower extremities during pitching in high-school baseball. Kurume Med J, 1998; 45(1): 21-25[Crossref][PubMed]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/hukin-2014-0028