Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2013 | 39 | 1 | 93-101

Article title

Exercise Intensity and Validity of the Ratings of Perceived Exertion (Borg and OMNI Scales) in an Indoor Cycling Session



Title variants

Languages of publication



The purpose of the study was: 1) to determine the intensity of an indoor cycling session; 2) to know the correlation between the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scales (Borg and OMNI) and % heart rate reserve (%HRR) with categories; and 3) to evaluate the validity of RPE scales (Borg and OMNI) with respect to the heart rate (HR) and %HRR. A total of fifty-three subjects, 25 males and 28 females (ages: 28.79 ± 6.04 years; body height: 1.71 ± 0.09 m; body mass: 69.59 ± 13.69 kg) were recruited from a private fitness club. All subjects performed the same predesigned indoor cycling session with a total duration of 50 minutes. During the experimental trial, the HR was recorded every 5 s. The Borg 6-20 RPE and OMNI 0-10 scales were used to assess perceived exertion in each phase. The average HR in the cardiovascular phase was 152.24 ± 14.11 b•min-1, the %HRR was 80.62 ± 7.10; and the overall RPE (Borg and OMNI scales) was 14.94 ± 1.11 and 7.18 ± 0.79 points, respectively. The correlation between an average HR and %HRR with Borg and OMNI scales was lower than r = 0.4 (p < 0.05). The correlation value between the Borg and the OMNI RPE scales was r = 0.82 (p < 0.001). It can be concluded that indoor cycling elicits effort of high intensity which could be inappropriate for some participants. The Borg and OMNI scales showed a low validity to quantify the intensity performed in indoor cycling sessions. It indicates the necessity to control the intensity of effort with other instruments to improve efficacy and decrease the risk of overload in this activity.










Physical description


1 - 12 - 2013
31 - 12 - 2013


  • Faculty of Education Sciences, Nursing and Physiotherapy. Laboratory of Kinesiology, Biomechanics and Ergonomics (KIBIOMER Lab), University of Almería, Almería. SPAIN


  • Battista RA, Foster C, Andrew J, Wright G, Lucia A, Porcari JP. Physiologic responses during indoor cycling. J Strength Cond Res, 2008; 22: 1236-1241[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Bianco A, Bellafiore M, Battaglia G, Paoli A, Caramazza G, Farina F, Palma A. The effects of indoor cycling training in sedentary overweight women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2010; 50: 159-165[PubMed]
  • Caria MA, Tangianu F, Concu A, Crisafulli A, Mameli, O. Quantification of Spinning bike performance during a standard 50-minute class. J Sports Sci, 2007; 25: 421-429[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Coquart JB, Garcin M. Validity and reliability of perceptually-based scales during exhausting runs in trained male runners. Percept Mot Skills, 2007; 104: 254-266[PubMed]
  • Crumpton S, Scharff-Olson M, Williford HN, Bradford A, Walker S. The effects of a comercially-produced "Spinning" video: Aerobic responses and caloric expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1999; 31: S112[Crossref]
  • Eston R. Use of rating of perceived exertion in sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2012; 7: 175-182[PubMed]
  • Eston RG, Faulkner JA, Mason EA, Parfitt G. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from perceptually regulated graded exercise tests of different durations. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2006; 97: 535-541[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Eston RG, Lamb KL, Parfitt G, King N. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually-regulated graded exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2005; 94: 221-227[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Foster C, Andrew J, Battista RA, Porcari JP. Metabolic and perceptual responses to indoor cycling. JCardiopulm Rehabil, 2006; 26: 270[Crossref]
  • Gellish RL, Goslin BR, Olson RE, McDonald A, Russi GD, Moudgil VK. Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2007; 39: 822-829[Crossref][PubMed][WoS]
  • Irving BA, Rutkowski J, Brock DW, Davis CK, Barrett EJ, Gaesser GA, Weltman A. Comparison of Borg- and OMNI-RPE as markers of the blood lactate response to exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2006; 38: 1348-1352[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Kang J, Chaloupka EC, Mastrangelo MA, Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, O'Connor E. Metabolic and perceptual responses during Spinning cycle exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005; 37: 853-859[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Laukkanen RM, Kalaja MK, Kalaja SP, Holmala EB, Paavolainen LM, Tummavuori M, Virtanen P, Rusko HK. Heart rate during aerobics classes in women with different previous experience of aerobics. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2001; 84: 64-68[PubMed][Crossref]
  • López-Miñarro PA, Muyor JM. Heart rate and overall ratings of perceived exertion during Spinning cycle indoor session in novice adults. Sci Sports, 2010; 25: 238-244 [Crossref]
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1998; 30: 975-991
  • Montero J, Lovesio C, Godoy MV, Ruiz G. Rhabdomyolysis caused by spinning in nine patients. Medicina, 2009; 69: 153-156[PubMed]
  • Muyor JM, López-Miñarrro PA. Overall ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during indoor cycling session in non-expert subjects. Med dello Sport, 2012; 65: 145-154
  • Ozkan A, Kin-Isler A. The reliability and validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion in step dance sessions. J Strength Cond Res, 2007; 21: 296-300[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Pérez-Landaluce J, Fernández-García B, Rodríguez-Alonso M, García-Herrero F, García-Zapico P, Patterson AM, Terrados N. Physiological differences and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in professional, amateur and young cyclists. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2002; 42: 389-395
  • Psycharakis SG. A longitudinal analysis on the validity and reliability of ratings of perceived exertion for elite swimmers. J Strength Cond Res, 2011; 25: 420-426[Crossref][WoS][PubMed]
  • Richey RM, Zabik RM, Dawson ML. Effect of bicycle spinning on heart rate, oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, and caloric expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1999; 31: S160[Crossref]
  • Scott TJ, Black CR, Quinn J, Coutts AJ. Validity and Reliability of the Session-RPE Method for Quantifying Training in Australian Football: A Comparison of the CR10 and CR100 Scales. J Strength Cond Res, 2013; 27: 270-276[WoS]
  • Shigematsu R, Ueno LM, Nakagaichi M, Nho H, Tanaka K. Rate of perceived exertion as a tool to monitor cycling exercise intensity in older adults. J Aging Phys Act, 2004; 12: 3-9[PubMed]
  • Valle VS, Mello DB, Fortes M, Dantas EHM. Effects of indoor cycling associated with diet on body composition and serum lipids. Biomed Hum Kinec, 2009; 1: 11-15
  • Valle VS, Mello DB, Fortes S, Dantas EH, Mattos MA. Effect of diet and indoor cycling on body composition and serum lipid. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2010; 95: 173-178[Crossref][PubMed][WoS]
  • Young IM, Thompson, K. Spinning-induced rhabdomyolisis: a case report. Eur J Emerg Medk, 2004; 11: 358-359 [Crossref]

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.