Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2013 | 37 | 1 | 183-193
Article title

Benefits of Bandwidth Feedback in Learning a Complex Gymnastic Skill

Title variants
Languages of publication
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two different frequencies of feedback during the process of learning a complex gymnastic skill, the round-off salto backward tucked. Thirty male acrobats participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to two groups: B - bandwidth feedback (n=15) or C - 100% feedback (n=15). Group B was provided with error information regarding the key elements of movement techniques only (bandwidth feedback). Our research demonstrates the advantage of augmented feedback information related to errors in the key elements. Information about errors in the key elements during learning a complex gymnastic skill prevents the gymnast from becoming overwhelmed, which promotes better motor control. These results provide support for the generalisation of bandwidth feedback principles to a complex task. Our research shows that the guidance hypothesis can also be tested in practical settings for a complex movement task.
Physical description
1 - 06 - 2013
05 - 07 - 2013
  • Adams JA. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 1987; 101: 41-74[Crossref]
  • Badets A, Blandin Y. Observational Learning: Effects of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results. Journal of MotorBehavior, 2005; 37: 211-216
  • Badets A, Blandin Y. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2010; 42: 257-268[WoS]
  • Baudry L, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R, Choller D. Auditory concurrent feedback benefits on the circle performed in gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006; 24: 149-156[Crossref]
  • Butki BD, Hoffman SJ. Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2003; 97: 569-580
  • Butler MS, Reeve TG, Fischman MG. Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1996; 67: 355-359[Crossref]
  • Cauraugh JH, Chen D, Radlo SJ. Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1993; 64: 413-417[Crossref]
  • FIG. Code of points: Artistic gymnastics for men. Federation of International Gymnastics; 2001
  • Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: Actions, movements and neuromotor processes. In J. H. Carr and R. B. Shephard (Eds.). Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 93-154; 1987
  • Hicks RE. Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975; 89: 50-60
  • Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 1992; 24: 187-196
  • Kernodle MW, Johnson R, Arnold DR. Verbal instruction for correcting errors versus such instructions plus videotape replay on learning the overhand throw. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2001; 92: 1039-1051
  • Klein PJ, DeHaven JJ. Accuracy of three-dimensional linear and angular estimates obtained with the ariel performance analysis system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1995; 76: 183-189[Crossref]
  • Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1996; 119: 254-284[Crossref]
  • Kohl RM, Guadagnoli MA. The scheduling of knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior,1996; 28: 233-240
  • Laguna P. Task complexity and sources of task-related information during the observational learning process. Journal of Sports Science, 2008; 26: 1097-1113
  • Lai Q, Shea CH. Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. ResearchQuarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1999; 70: 79-83
  • Lai Q, Shea CH, Wulf G, Wright DL. Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,2000; 71: 10-24[Crossref]
  • Lee TD, Carnahan H. When to provide knowledge of results during motor learning: Scheduling effects. Human Performance, 1990; 3: 87-105[Crossref]
  • Lee TD, Maraj BK. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercises and Sport, 1994; 61: 284-290
  • Liu UD. An experimental study on the relationship between opportunity of feedback and effects of feedback in physical education instructions. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education. 2001; 16(2): 65-66
  • Magill RA. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. Dubuque, IA: Borow and Benchmark; 1993
  • Magill RA. Knowledge is more than we can talk about: Implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. ResearchQuarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998; 69: 104-110
  • Magill RA, Schoenfelder-Zoholi B. A visual model and knowledge of performances sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1996; 27: 7-22
  • Maslovat D, Brunke KM, Chua R, Franks IM. Feedback effects on learning a novel bimanual coordination pattern: support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 2009; 41: 45-54
  • Masser LS. Critical cues help first grade students’ achievement in handstand and forward rolls. Journal ofTeaching in Physical Education, 1993; 12: 301-312
  • Mawer M. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it! Teaching skills in physical education. BritishJournal of Physical Education, 1990; 21: 307-311
  • Newell KM. Knowledge of result and motor learning. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 1976; 4: 195-228
  • Park JH, Shea CH, Wright DL. Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2000; 32: 287-296
  • Sadowski J, Mastalerz A, Niźnikowski T, Wiśniowski W, Biegajło M, Kulik M. The effects of different types of verbal feedback on learning a complex movement task studies Pol. J. Sport Tourism, 2011; 18: 308-310
  • Sadowski J, Niźnikowska E, Niźnikowski T. Effectiveness of teaching the basic acrobatic exercises and patterns in the case of acrobats having different coordination potential. Pol. J. Sport Tourism, 2009; 16: 209-220
  • Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 1984; 95: 355-386[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Schmidt RA. Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991
  • Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999
  • Sherwood DE. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and MotorSkills,1988; 66: 535-542
  • Smith PJ, Taylor SJ, Withers K. Applying bandwidth feedback scheduling to a golf shot. Research Quarterlyfor Exercise and Sport, 1997; 68: 215-21
  • Swinnen SP. Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances inmotor learning and control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 37-66; 1996
  • Swinnen SP, Lee TD, Verschueren S, Serrien DJ, Bogaerds H. Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 1997; 16: 749-785[Crossref]
  • Tzetzis G, Votsis E. The effect of different feedback methods on badminton skills acquisition and retention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2006; 102: 275-284[Crossref]
  • Whiting HTA, Vereijken B. The acquisition of coordination in skill learning. International Journal of SportPsychology, 1993; 24: 343-357
  • Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced feedback of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990; 16: 677-691
  • Wright DL, Munyon-Smith V, Sidaway B. How close is too close for precise knowledge of results? ResearchQuarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1997; 68: 172-176
  • Wulf G, Shea CH. Principles derived from study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2002; 9: 185-211
  • Wulf G, Shea CH. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A.M. Williams, and N.J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport. Oxford, England: Routledge, 121-144; 2004
  • Wulf G, Shea CH, Matschiner S. Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1998; 30: 180-192
  • Young DE, Schmidt RA. Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition. In G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II Amsterdam: North-Holland. 677-693; 1992
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.