Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 8 | 3 | 119-128

Article title

Content Analysis Algorithms: An Innovative and Accurate Approach to Statement Veracity Assessment


Title variants

Languages of publication











Physical description


1 - 9 - 2014
20 - 12 - 2014


  • Clinical and Forensic Psychology Department, University of Silesia Katowice Poland


  • Akehurst L., Bull R., Vrij A., Koehnken G., (2004), Th e eff ects of training professional groups and lay persons to use Criteria-Based Content Analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877.[Crossref]
  • Blandon-Gitlin I., Pezdek K., Lindsay S.D., Hagen L. (2009), Criteria-Based Content Analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Buck J.A., Warren A.R., Betman S.I., Brigham J.C. (2002), Age diff erences in criteria-based content analyses scores in typical sexual abuse interviews. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 267.[Crossref]
  • Goedert H.W., Gamer M., Rill H.R., Vossel G., (2005), Statement validity assessment: inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225.[Crossref]
  • Granhag P.A., Stroemwall L.A., Landstroem S. (2008), Children recalling an event repeatedly: eff ects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Crimininological Psychology, 11, 81-98.
  • Kapardis A., (2003), Psychology and law. A critical introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Koehnken G.(2004), Statement Validity Analysis and the “detection of truth” in P.A. Granhag, L.A. Stroemwall, eds. Th e detection of deception in forensic contexts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41.
  • Koehnken G., Schimossek E., Aschermann E., Hoefer E., (1995), Th e Cognitive Interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6, 671.[Crossref]
  • Pezdek K. (2004), Detecting deception in children: event familiarity aff ects Criterion-Based Content Analysis ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1, 119-126.[Crossref]
  • Rassin E. (2001), Criteria-based content analysis: the less scientifi c road to truth. Expert Evidence, 7, 265.
  • Ruby C.L., Brigham J.C. (1997), Th e usefulness of the Criterion-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 705.[Crossref]
  • Sporer S.L. (1997), Th e less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373.[Crossref]
  • Trankell A. (1972), Reliability of evidence, Beckmans, Stockholm.
  • Undeutsch U. (1967), Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Zeugenaussagen, in: Handbuch der Rechtspsychologie, ed. Undeutsch U., Gettingen, Hogrefe, 26.
  • Vrij A., (2008), Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Vrij A. (2005), Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the fi rst 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 1, 3.
  • Vrij A., Mann S., (2006), Criteria-Based Content Analysis: an empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 337.
  • Vrij A., Akehurst L., Soukara S., Bull R. (2004), Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and Reality Monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching and deception, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 2, 113.[Crossref]
  • Wojciechowski B.W. (2012). Ocena wiarygodności zeznań świadkow dorosłych przy zastosowaniu psychologicznych i prawniczych kryteriow treściowych; unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Silesia in Katowice.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.