Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 8 | 1 | 29-44

Article title

Value of Content-Based Deception Detection Methods


Title variants

Languages of publication











Physical description


1 - 3 - 2014
21 - 6 - 2014


  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland


  • Adams S.H. (1996), Statement analysis: What do suspects’ words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, October, 12-20.
  • Akehurst L., Bull R., Vrij A., Koehnken G. (2004), Th e eff ects of training professional groups and lay persons to use Criteria - Based Content Analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877-891.[Crossref]
  • Akehurst L., Koehnken G., Hoefer E. (2001), Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 65-83.[Crossref]
  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: A new answer to an old question? In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and Law. International Perspectives (328-332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Arntzen F. (1989), Psychologia zeznań świadkow. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  • Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2011). Diff erential eff ectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 473-489.[Crossref]
  • Blandon-Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Lindsay, S.D., & Hagan, L. (2008). Criteriabased content analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901-917.
  • Bradford, D. (2006.) Detection of deception in the confessional context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales.
  • Buck, J. A., Warren, A. R., Betman, S. I., & Brigham, J. C. (2002). Age diff erences in Criteria-Based Content Analysis scores in typical child sexual abuse interviews. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 267-283.[Crossref]
  • Caso, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & de Leo, G. (2006). Deceptive responses: Th e impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99-111.[Crossref]
  • Craig, R. A., Scheibe, R., Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C. & Dodd, D. (1999). Interviewer questions and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 77-85.[Crossref]
  • Dando. C. J., Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police offi cers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Off ender Profi ling, 8, 189-202.
  • Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., and Horan, N. (2000), Th e impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child abuse victims, Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81-97.
  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Dukała, K. Sporer, S., Polczyk, R. (in preparation). Can Cognitive Interview Impair Lie Detection Using CBCA Criteria in Elderly Witnesses Testimonies?
  • Erdmann, K., Volbert, R., & Bohm, C. (2004). Children report suggested events even when interviewed in a non-suggestive manner: What are its implications for credibility assessment? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 561-589.
  • Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988, June). A fi eld study of criteria- based content analysis of children’s statement in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Studies Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
  • Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.[Crossref]
  • Fisher, R.P, & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancement techniques for investigative interviewing: Th e cognitive interview. Springfi eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Godert, H.W., Gamer, M., Rill, H.G., & Vossel, G. (2005) Statement validity assessment Inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225-245.
  • Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Landstrom, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Eff ects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 81-98.[Crossref]
  • Gruza, E. (2009). Psychologia sądowa dla prawnikow. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wolters Kluwer business.
  • Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M.L. (1997). Th e Cognitive Interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55-68.[Crossref]
  • Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1997). Th e relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children’s responses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 169-176.[Crossref]
  • Johnson. M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.[Crossref]
  • Kohnken, G. (1999, July). Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the pre-conference programme of applied courses ‘Assessing credibility’ organised by the European Association of Psychology and Law. Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the ‘detection of the truth. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Stro¨mwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (41-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Ho¨fer, E. (1995). Th e cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult’s statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.[Crossref]
  • Lamers-Winkelman, F., & Buffi ng, F. (1996). Children’s testimony in the Netherlands: A study of statement validity analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 304-321.[Crossref]
  • Landry, K., & Brigham, J. (1992). Th e eVect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.[Crossref]
  • Marten, Z. (2012). Psychologia zeznań. Warszawa: Lexis Nexis. Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). Th e cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340-372.
  • Otgaar, H., Candel, I., Memon, A., Almerigogna, J. (2010), Diff erentiating between children’s true and false memories using Reality Monitoring criteria’ Psychology, Crime and Law,16, 555-566.
  • Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). Th e nature of real, implanted, and Fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 517-537.[Crossref]
  • Raskin, D. C. & Esplin, P. W. (1991b). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
  • Roberts, K., P. & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Reality-monitoring characteristics in confi rmed and doubtful allegations of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1049-1079.[Crossref]
  • Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). Th e usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 705-737.[Crossref]
  • Ruby, C.L. & Brigham, J.C. (1998). Can criteria-based content analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behaviour, 22, 369-388.
  • Santtila, P., Roppola, H., & Niemi, P. (1999). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye’s model of Reality Monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6, 273-289.
  • Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): Th e eff ects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer’s emotional style. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6, 159-179.[Crossref]
  • Saykaly, Ch. (2009), Eff ects of Multiple Interview on Children’s Verbal Expressive Behaviour of True and Fabricated Events. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
  • Schelleman-Off ermans, K. and Merckelbach, H. (2010), Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. J. Investig. Psych. Off ender Profi l., 7, 247-260.
  • Short, J. L. and Bodner, G. E. (2011), Diff erentiating accounts of actual, suggested and fabricated childhood events using the judgment of memory characteristics questionnaire. Appied. Cogniive. Psychology, 25: 775-781.
  • Sporer S.L., Sharman S.J. (2006), Should I Believe this? Reality Monitoring of Accounts of Self - Experienced and Invented Recent and Distant Autobiographical Events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854.[Crossref]
  • Sporer, S. (1997). Th e less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.[Crossref]
  • Sporer, S. L. & Breuer, M. M. (2005). Validity of the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales-Short Training Version-German (ARJS-STV-G). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, TBA, San Antonio.
  • Sporer, S. L. & Bursh, S. E. (2003). Training to Detect Deception by Verbal Means: Learning to Discriminate or Change in Response Bias? Unpublished Manuscript, University of Giessen, Germany.
  • Sporer, S.L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P.A. Granhag & L. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (64-102). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  • Sporer, S.L., & Kupper, B. (1995). Realita¨tsu¨berwachung und die Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehaltes von Erza¨hlungen: Eine experimentelle Studie [Reality monitoring and the judgment of the truthfulness of accounts: An experimental study]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173-193.
  • Steller, M. and Kohnken, G. (1989) “Criteria-Based Statement Analysis”, in Raskin, D.C. (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 217-245.
  • Steller, M., & Ko¨hnken, G. (1989). Statement analysis: Credibility assessment of children’s testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D.C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (217-245). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Steller, M., & Wellershaus, P. (1996). Information enhancement and credibility assessment of child statements: the impact of the cognitive interview technique on criteria-based content analysis. In G.Davies, S.Lloyd Bostock, M.McMurran, & C.Wilson (Eds.),Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (118-126). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Stromwall, L. A. & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s Repeated Lies and Truths: Eff ects on Adults’ Judgments and Reality Monitoring Scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.[Crossref]
  • Stromwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s repeated lies and truths: Eff ects on adults judgements and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.[Crossref]
  • Tye, M. C., Amato, S. L., Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., & Peters, D. (1999).Th e willigness of children to lie and the assessment of credibility in an ecologically relevant laboratory setting. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 92-109.[Crossref]
  • Vrij A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the fi rst 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 3-41.[Crossref]
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell aconvincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 113-126.[Crossref]
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? Th e eff ect of deception, age, status, coaching and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261-283.
  • Vrij, A., Kneller, W., & Mann, S. (2000). Th e eff ect of informing liars about Criteria- Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology 5, 57-70.
  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fischer, R. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behaviour, 31, 499-518.
  • Wojciechowski, B. (2012). Ocena wiarygodności zeznań świadkow dorosłych przy zastosowaniu psychologicznych i prawniczych kryteriow treściowych. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Silesia.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.