Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 6 | 2 | 142-153

Article title

Systematic Review of the Bioecological Theory in Sport Sciences


Title variants

Languages of publication



The purpose of the present review was to provide an up-to-date summary of the bio ecological theory in sport literature. Systematic reviews can facilitate decision-making in areas where randomized control trials (RCTs) have not been performed or are inappropriate. In order to appreciate the status of current knowledge and understanding and to identify potential future directions, the authors conducted a synthesis of published work in sports science using a systematic-review methodology. Published since 1977, Bronfenbrenner's model of human development provided an ecological lens for identifying and synthesizing barriers to sport participation. From a search of electronic databases, findings comprised 1120 identified records, from which only 896 entries were considered. From these a total of 183 published studies relating to the bioecological theory and sports science were assessed, and from this point only articles pertaining to sport related issues were taken into consideration (n = 89) excluding other types of documents (n = 94). The Systematic Review (SR)develops upon these 89 articles and a total of 23 articles were selected for the fourth and final retrieval. A semi quantitative review protocol and standard quality assessment criteria-have dominated the research. The authors conclude by summarizing the key findings in the literature and highlighting the gaps that could be filled by future research.










Physical description


1 - 5 - 2013
1 - 6 - 2014
15 - 7 - 2014


  • University of Coimbra, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal
  • University of Coimbra, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal


  • 1. Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: University Press; 2003.
  • 2. Bronfenbrenner U. Development ecology through space and time: Future perspectives. In: Moen P, Elder GH, Luescher K, editors. Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995, 125-156.
  • 3. Bronfenbrenner U. Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD, editors. Measuring environmentacross the life sport: Emerging methods and concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999, 3-28.
  • 4. Bronfebrenner U. Growing chaos in the lives of children and families how can we turn it around? In: Westman JC, editor. Parenthood in America. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press; 2001, 235-256.
  • 5. Bronfenbrenner U. Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.
  • 6. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A biological model. Psychol Rev. 1994;101:568-586.[Crossref]
  • 7. Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The ecology of developmental process. In: Damon W, Lerner R, editors. Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. 5th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1998,993-1028.
  • 8. Tudge J, Gray JT, Hogan DM. Ecological perspectives in human development: A comparison of Gibson and Bronfenbrenner. In: Tudge J, Shanahan MJ, Valsiner J, organizers. Comparisons in human devel-opment: Understanding time and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997, 72-105.
  • 9. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.
  • 10. Bronfenbrenner U, Evans GW. Developmental science in the 21st Century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Soc Dev. 2000;9:115-125.[Crossref]
  • 11. Krebs RJ. Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Theory of Human Development and the process of development of sports talent. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:108-135.
  • 12. Krebs RJ. Proximal processes as the primary engines of development. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:219-227.
  • 13. Krebs RJ. From motor stimulation to specialization: first draft of a theory of motor specialization. Revista Kinesis. 1992;9:29-44.
  • 14. Koller SH, editor. Ecology of Human Development. Research and Intervention in Brazil. Sao Paulo: Casa do Psicologo; 2004.
  • 15. Tudge JR, Mokrova I, Hatfield BE, Karnik RB. Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Theory of Human Development. J Fam Theory Rev. 2009;1:198-210.[Crossref]
  • 16. Adamsons K, O'Brien M, Pasley K. An ecological approach to father involvement in biological and stepfather families. Fathering2007;5:129-147.
  • 17. Campbell FA, Pungello EP, Miller-Johnson S. The development of perceived scholastic competence and global self-worth in African American adolescents from low income families: The roles of family factors, early educational intervention, and academic experience. J Adol Res. 2002;17:277-302[Crossref]
  • 18. Riggins-Caspers KM, Cadoret RJ, Knutson JF, Langbehn D. Biology and environment interaction and evocative biology-environment correlation: Contributions of harsh discipline and parental psychopa-thology to problem adolescent behaviors. Behav Genet. 2003;33:205-220.[Crossref]
  • 19. Tudge JH, Odero DA, Hogan D M, Etz KE. Relations between the everyday activities of preschoolers and their teachers' perceptions of their competence in the first years of school. Ear Child Res Q. 2003;18:42-64.
  • 20. Araujo D. Preface to “Ecological approaches to cognition in sport and exercise”. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:1-4.
  • 21. Araüjo D, Davids K. Ecological approaches to cognition and action in sport and exercise: Ask not only what you do, but where you do it. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:5-37.
  • 22. Domingues M, Goncalves CE. Social aport club and youth sport expectations: Personal and social determinants in contrasting ecologies of practice. Am J Hum Ecol. 2012;1:71-78.
  • 23. Domingues M, Goncalves CE. Young athletes social networks in different sporting contexts. Macro Rev. 2013a;2:43-54.
  • 24. Domingues M, Goncalves CE. Social dimension of a sport club nested in the suburbs of Porto and others perception in its construction. Annals Res Sport Phys Edu. 2013;4:25-46.
  • 25. Holt N, Spence ZL, Cutumisu SN. Neighborhood and developmental differences in children's perceptions of opportunities for play and physical activity. Health & Place.2008;14:2-14.[Crossref]
  • 26. La Voi NM, Dutove JK. Barriers and supports for female coaches: an ecological model. Sport Coach Rev. 2012;1:17-37.
  • 27. Holt N, Tamminen KA, Black DE, Sehn ZL, Wall MP. Parental involvement in competitive youth sport settings. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9:663-685.[Crossref]
  • 28. Holt N, Cunningham CT, Sehn ZL, Spence JC, Newton AS, Ball GD. Neighborhood physical activity opportunities for inner-city children and youth. Health & Place. 2009;15:1022-1028.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 29. Urban JB, Lewin-Bizan S, Lerner RM. The role of neighborhood ecological assets and activity involvement in youth developmental outcomes: Differential impacts of asset poor and asset rich neighborhoods. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2009;30:601-614.[Crossref]
  • 30. Garcia Bengoechea E. Integrating knowledge and expanding horizons in developmental sport psychology: A bioecological perspective. Quest. 2002;54:1-20.[Crossref]
  • 31. GarciaBengoechea U, Jonhson GM. Ecological Systems Theory and children's development in sport: Toward a process-person-context-time research paradigm. Avante. 2001;7:20-31.
  • 32. Holt NL, Tink LN, Mandigo JL, Fox KR. Do youth learn life skills through their involvement in high school sport? A case study. Can J Edu. 2008;31:281-304.
  • 33. Partridge JA. Current directions in social influence: parents and peers. Revista De Iberoamericana de Psicologia del Ejercicio Y el Deporte. 2011;6:251-268.
  • 34. Limstrand T. Environmental characteristics relevant to young people's use of sports facilities: a review. Scand J Med Sci Spor. 2008;18:275-287.[Crossref]
  • 35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. 2009;6:1-25.
  • 36. Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. 2004;13:1-15.
  • 37. Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA. 1994;272:101-104.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 38. Timmer A, Sutherland LR, Hilsden RJ. Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:2-17.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • 39. Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. In: Mays N, Pope C, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000, 89-101.
  • 40. Popay R, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res.1998;8:341-351.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • 41. Brettschneider WD. Effects of sport club activities on adolescent development in Germany. Eur J Sport Sci. 2001;1:1-11.[Crossref]
  • 42. Scheerder J, Thomis M, Vanreusel B, Lefevre J, Renson R, Vanden Eynde B, Beunen G. Sports participation among females from adolescence to adulthood a longitudinal study. IntReviSociol Sport. 2006;41:413-430.
  • 43. Garcia Bengoechea E, Johnson G. Ecological systems theory and children's development in sport: Toward a process-person-context-time research paradigm. Avante. 2001;7:20-31.
  • 44. Krebs RJ, Ramalho MH, Santos JO, Nazario PF, Nobre GC, Almeida RT. Adolescents' disposition for sports' practice: a study oriented by the Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory. Motriz. 2011;17:195-201.
  • 45. Moore S, Barnett RV, Brennan MA, Gibson H. Scoring on and off the field: Examining the sexual activity of adolescent/emerging adult athletes and non-athletes using an ecological perspective. J Youth Develop. Bridging research and practice. 2011;6:15-33.
  • 46. Pope CC, O'Sullivan M. Darwinism in the gym. J Teach Phys Educ. 2003;22:311-327.
  • 47. Darling N. Ecological Systems Theory: The person in the center of the circles. Res Hum Dev. 2007;4:203-217.[Crossref]
  • 48. Beek PJ. Ecological approaches to sport psychology: prospects and challenges. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:144-151.
  • 49. Papaioannou A. Students' perceptions of physical education class environment for boys and girls and the perceived motivational climate. Res Q Exercise Sport. 1998;69:267-275.[Crossref]
  • 50. Dunn JC. Goal orientations, perceptions of the motivational climate, and perceived competence of children with movement difficulties. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2000;17:1-19.
  • 51. Larsen CH, Alfermann D, Christensen MK. Psychosocial skills in a youth soccer academy: a holistic ecological perspective. Sport Sci Rev. 2012;21:51-74.
  • 52. Garcia Bengoechea E, Strean W. Examining third order effects on adolescents' sport participation and motivation. In: Simmons MP, Foster LA, editors. Sport Exer Phycol Res Adv. 2008, 157-174.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.