Technical and tactical analysis of women’s volleyball
Languages of publication
Introduction: The study aim was to construct a technical and tactical analysis of women’s volleyball based on notational analysis in top-level and junior women’s European volleyball matches, to compare these two levels, and to clarify the differences between the winners and losers of a set. Material and Methods: Four matches from the 2010 FIVB Women’s Volleyball World Championships and 2010 CEV Junior Women’s European Championship 2010 were analyzed using Data Volley software. The number and performance level of different skills were recorded in total and were grouped according to the role of the players. Methods of scoring and attacking zones were also analyzed. Results: There were only slight differences between the two levels in terms of success in different skills. When the skill executions were compared between the winning and losing teams of a set within the levels, less successful skill executions and more errors in different skills were found for the losing teams. Conclusions: The results seem to indicate that there are only minor differences between adult and junior women’s volleyball at the highest level. Attacking seems to be the most important skill concerning winning in both levels. The efficiency of attacking seems to depend upon the quality and versatility of the setting and also from the physical abilities of the players.
09 - 11 - 2013
- Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, firstname.lastname@example.org
- LIKES Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland
- KIHU – Research Institute for Olympic Sports, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
- 1. Afonso J., F. Esteves, R. Araújo, L. Thomas, I. Mesquita (2012) Tactical determinants of setting zone in elite men’s volleyball. J. Sports Sci. Med., 11: 64-70.
- 2. Afonso J., I. Mesquita, R. Marcelino, J. da Silva (2010) Analysis of the setter’s tactical action in high-performance women’s volleyball. Kinesiology, 42: 82-89.
- 3. Bergeles N., K. Barzouka, N. Elissavet (2009) Performance of male and female setters and attackers on Olympic-level volleyball teams. Int. J. Perform. AnalysisSport, 9: 141-148.
- 4. Bozhkova A. (2013) Playing efficiency of the best volleyball players in the world. Research in Kinesiology, 41: 92-95.
- 5. Costa G., J. Afonso, E. Brant, I. Mesquita (2012) Differences in game patterns between male and female youth volleyball. Kinesiology, 4: 60-66.
- 6. Durkovic T., N. Marelic, T. Resetar (2008) Influence of the position of players in rotation on differences between winning and losing teams in volleyball. Int. J. Perform. Analysis Sport, 8: 8-15.
- 7. Eom H., R. Schutz (1992) Statistical analyses of volleyball performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 63: 11-18.
- 8. Garganta J. (2012) Trends of tactical performance analysis in team sport bridging the gap between research training and competition. Rev. Port. Cien.Desp., 9: 81-89.
- 9. Hughes M., R. Bartlett (2002) The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. J. Sports Sci., 20: 739-754.
- 10. Häyrinen M., H. Lehto, T. Mikkola, P. Honkanen, A. Paananen, P. Lahtinen, M. Blomqvist (2010) Miesten lentopallon lajianalyysi kolmella eri tasolla (Technical and tactical game analysis of men’s elite volleyball in three different levels). KIHUn julkaisusarja, nro 16 (The publication series of KIHU, no 16). Jyväskylä: KIHU - Research Institute for Olympic Sports. Retrieved from KIHU’s website: http://www.kihu.fi/tuotostiedostot/julkinen/2010_hay_miesten_le_sel66_68799.pdf.
- 11. Lobietti R., R. Di Michele, F. Mermi (2006) Relationships between performance parameters and final ranking in professional volleyball. In Proceedings of WCPAS 2006 Szombathely 24-28 August 2006, World Congress of the Society of Performance Analysis in Sport.
- 12. Marcelino R., J. Sampaio, I. Mesquita. (2012) Attack and serve performances according to the match period and quality of opposition in elite volleyball matches. J. Strength Cond. Res., 26: 3385-3391.
- 13. Mesquita I., B. Cesar (2007) Characterisation of the opposite player’s attack from the opposition block characteristics. An applied study in the Athens Olympic games in female volleyball teams. Int. J. Perform. AnalysisSport, 7: 13-27.
- 14. Miskin M., G. Fellingham, L. Florence (2010) Skill importance in women’s volleyball. JQAS, 6, Article 5. DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1234.[Crossref]
- 15. Palao J., I. Ahrabi-Fard (2011) Side-out success in relation to setter’s position on court in women’s college volleyball. IJASS, 23: 155-167.
- 16. Palao J., P. Manzanares, E. Ortega (2009) Techniques used and efficacy of volleyball skills in relation to gender. Int. J. Perform. Analysis Sport, 9: 281-293.
- 17. Palao J., J. Santos, A. Urena (2004) Effect of team level on skill performance in volleyball. Int. J. Perform. Analysis Sport, 4: 50-60.
- 18. Palao J., J. Santos, A. Urena (2007) Effect of the manner of spike execution on spike performance in volleyball. Int. J. Perform. Analysis Sport, 7:1 26-138.
- 19. Přidal V. J. Hančák, J. (2012) Effects of the quality of selected kinds of game skills of an individual on the set outcome in men’s top-level volleyball. Acta FacultatisEducationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 52: 49-60.
- 20. Quiroga M., J. Garcia-Manso, D. Rodriguez-Ruiz, S. Sarmiento, Y. De Saa, M. Moreno (2010) Relation between in-game role and service characteristics in elite women´s volleyball. J. Strength Cond. Res., 24: 2316-2321.
- 21. Rodriguez-Ruiz D., M. Quiroga, J. Miralles, S. Sarmiento, Y. de Saa, J. Garcia-Manso (2011). Study of the technical and tactical variables determining set win or loss in top-level European men’s volleyball. JQAS, 7, Article 7. DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1281.[Crossref]
- 22. Zadraznik M., N. Marelic, T. Resetar (2009) Differences in rotations between the winning and losing teams at the youth European volleyball championships for girls. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica, 39: 33-40.
Publication order reference